𝕮𝖑𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖚𝖘 𝖁𝖊𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖚𝖆𝖗𝖉

My top 5: 1- The Acacia Strain 2- Hell (M.S.W.) 3- Primitive Man 4- Thy Art Is Murder 5- Fit For An Autopsy

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ So no, you can’t. How shocking.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ You sure seem reluctant to talk about it.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ Defining marriage as “anything but a religious ceremony” isn’t necessary for me to be correct here.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Yes, if you define marriage as “anything but a religious ceremony” then you have a much stronger argument. But its is. And theres a reason gays want it.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ You have a very active imagination if you got that impression, to put it politely.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ See, i thought we were talking about the difference between civil unions and holy matrimony, and the motivation behind gays demanding being recognized as joined in holy matrimony.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ …not sure where you got that from to be honest.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ …understand why you’re reluctant to engage with facts that refute your definition of marriage though, if you did so you’d have to correct your position and that isn’t something many people are capable of accepting. It would also be strange for an agnostic to “hate god”, I’m…

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ Could you quote me denying the existence of the form of marriage that you’re pretending defines marriage?

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Yep. And that is a nonsense argument lol. “Other forms have existed so this form doesn’t exist” Ask yourself, as a gay man, why would you even want to be joined holy matrimony?

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ Marriage is “the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship”, so yes in sane countries gays can by definition be married, your attempt to narrow it’s definition to being exclusively heterosexual are irrelevant.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ If semantics matter to you, then gays can’t be married, technically speaking. Marriage is a heterosexual, religious, and social institution. Gays shouldn’t even desire to be married. The only reason they want it is they actually can’t have it. Its not for them.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ We are talking about marriage, which is defined as “the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship”, few of the examples I mentioned which don’t fit your definition are ancient, most are contemporary.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Are we talking about the meaning of marriage in modern America, or ancient world breeding practices? You have to pick one “5000 years ago in a country on the other side of the world” is a meaningless argument.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ You haven’t debunked any of this.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ But I debunked that claim and revealed that it is, in fact, I who is correct and you the dullard and charlatan

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ I’ve already established that you’re incorrect, declaring otherwise doesn’t undo that.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Sorry but im right and you are wrong. Good talk

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ Giving examples of you being wrong isn’t cope, arguing that marriage is defined as christian marriage because “most people think of church bells when they hear the word marriage” is cope.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Now thats just cope. None of what you’re arguing is even legal in the United States. And its a dumb argument to boot. “Thats not marriage because Ghengis Khan fucked half of Asia” is a new one on me lol

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ I mean yeah, your argument comes down to semantics as well, we’re talking about the meaning of a word so on some level that’s what the discussion is. And the imagery that comes to mind when you say a word doesn’t define it that isn’t how words and concepts are defined.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Right. You’re argument is down to semantics. Most people think of church bells and a pastor when they think of marriage. So I would argue Holy Matrimony is synonymous with marriage in these United States In point of fact, thats why the gays wanted access to it so badly

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ Nope, the point isn’t that any of these forms are necessarily superior, just that their existence disproves the definition of marriage you gave. And since the US is not a theocracy people can and do get married according to whatever religious customs or lack thereof they want.

@_VoidRevenant @RealestMemes_ Oh you mean back when I would just go talk to some girls father and arrange to purchase her for breeding and housekeeping? I mean… its an arguably better system. But we live in America, and the Christian conception is ubiquitous.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ …definition is just wrong on every point.

@redpillpopper78 @RealestMemes_ …that “the purpose of generating and educating children” is necessary to it’s definition either. Its form has ranged from polygyny to polyandry to monogamy as well, so “one man and one woman” is wrong too. None of this is whataboutism, your…

How the FUCK is getting a gun NOT an obvious part of "keep and bear arms"? Fuck them. Make a gun. guncadindex.com