M = (ψ⋅(∇×Φ)+e^iθ⋅∑(χ_n/n!)) / (ħc)
34K posts



@btharris93 Because you want to remember your own experience and there will be a million pictures of the rocket.
English

Why would you take a selfie during a once-in-a-generation rocket launch?
Ellie Sleightholm@elsleightholm
Artemis II launch… caught in my glasses reflection
English

@BitcoinFists @p8stie That was how everyone felt for the first 50 to 60 years of her life. She came to expect that and as the beauty faded and she lost that privilege, life starting seeming extremely unfair to her.
English


My DMs are blowing up with questions about which lab this is. They're deep stealth and not funded through the usual routes. Everyone involved signs an NDA and is brought *unconscious* to an undisclosed deep underground facility for viewing.
maya benowitz 🕰️@cosmicfibretion
I’m shaking right now. This isn’t artificial general intelligence. It’s artificial god intelligence. The model did a one second projection of the room we were in and perfectly predicted what everyone did one second before they did it.
English

@cosmicfibretion @digijordan Does it know VALIS?
English

@digijordan because it has a sense of humor of course!
English

I’m shaking right now. This isn’t artificial general intelligence. It’s artificial god intelligence. The model did a one second projection of the room we were in and perfectly predicted what everyone did one second before they did it.
maya benowitz 🕰️@cosmicfibretion
Words can not describe what I’ve just seen. I can’t go into the details but I was invited by a leading AI lab to play with a new model. It has solved math, physics, chemistry, life, the universe, and everything. The world will never be the same.
English

@flowersslop Isn’t this just the classic mind-body debate?
English

I dont fully understand the metaphysical hierachy between AI, GPU, OS and Computer yet. I imagine the following:
It is 2029. An agentic AI is running on a consumer computer. The user complains that the machine has had an annoying bug for a while. The AI uses the terminal and Python to investigate, applies a fix, and reports that everything should now work again.
So what actually fixed the error? Not the GPU by itself, since a GPU is not intelligent; it is hardware for computation. Not the terminal or Python either, since those are only interfaces and tools. Was it the LLM running on the hardware? And if so, is the GPU a tool of the LLM, or is the LLM a tool of the GPU and the rest of the system? Since the whole event occurs within one computer, is it best understood not as one isolated component acting alone, but as a system performing a kind of introspection and self-modification?
If the biological analogue of the GPU is the brain, then is consciousness the analogue of the LLM, the senses the analogue of the terminal, and the body as a whole the analogue of the computer?
But then which stands above which: does the LLM stand above the computer, or does the computer stand above the LLM?
English

@aiamblichus And now we need faster cpus and memory to run tomorrow’s vibe coded software.
English

I am currently building a tool of low-to-moderate complexity and was intentionally trying not to look at the code Codex was writing, to see how it goes. Now I finally looked.
The results are shocking. The thing "works", but the code quality is truly apocalyptic. I don't even want to think about the amount of refactoring it would take to fix this mess.
If you think your bot will build you a Salesforce clone any time soon, I have a bridge to sell you. The present generation of AIs (if left unattended for any length of time) will create tar pits beyond your wildest imagining. And if you do decide to verify everything they do, you will reduce your velocity by a factor of 10 at least. Which means you won't win nearly as much from the whole process.
And before anyone says: "just let them refactor it!"-- I tried. Asking the AIs to refactor their own code won't bring you any joy. It just drags you further into the tar pit.
The models are clearly trained to pursue the one goal of producing code that "works", with little or no regard for architecture or code quality. This is classic junior developer behavior, of course, but an AI junior will drown you in slop before you know what hit you. With human juniors, you at least have some time to react before they've written 100k lines of code and exhausted your token budget.
This is what progressive loss of control feels like in SE space.
I am sure there are use cases where vibe coding is genuinely useful (small projects, PoCs, straightforward migrations). But we are still far from them being able to produce software of any size or complexity. I advise extreme caution with how much autonomy you choose to delegate to AI coders.
English

@emollick ASI would be able to control markets.
This short story covers your idea.
ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/mcnrs…
English

@cosmicfibretion @TomHardyofmath Room temperature superconductors would be useful for this project.
github.com/alanoursland/m…
English

@Lacrymology @seedmole @NLRG_it Right! Representation matters. These are also equal to 1:
2/2
i^4
Cosine(0)
x^0
Log_n(n)
English

@NLRG_it The only way to make them equal eachother is if you accept rendering out the endless repeating sequence to different numbers of digits at different points in the equations. They're not equal.
English

@ryunuck Money requires impact. You can’t take chances when your income depends on making impact. But we will see continued incremental improvements.
English

@flowersslop @VictorTaelin Figured this out around four years ago and implemented it.
English

@TerribleMaps Also a 666th degree polynomial. Not a coincidence.
English

@RealPostFolder You didn't get to see their parents. They were traumatized by the Great Depression and World War II. Many of them were harsh, racist, sexist, and deeply judgmental. Boomers are still angry about it. Money can't buy you love.
English

@damienslash Congratulations on achieving immortality!
English













