dragon71
1.2K posts


True, install a @Tesla Powerwall to have uninterrupted power for your house.
When your utility goes down, you will be one of the few in your neighborhood with working lights, working refrigerator and able to charge all your devices.
Sam Korus@skorusARK
Bringing energy storage to the home is like indoor plumbing. Your toilet tank has storage. Your water heater is storage. You don't know it yet, but you're electrically living like you're in the 1930s.
English

@StolenDans We hire people all the time. Most quit pretty quick
English
dragon71 أُعيد تغريده

@_The_Prophet__ @zerohedge To me this signals that they are going to be stealing alot more Bitcoin!
English

This is a rupture in the monetary membrane.
Britain is not just “selling some Bitcoin” to fill a hole. What’s happening here is the first formal instance of a Western government treating Bitcoin as state-held strategic collateral - mobilized like gold once was - to backstop sovereign solvency.
This is not a retail story. It’s a structural pivot.
Let’s decode it without filters:
•In 2018, UK authorities seized 61,000 BTC from a Chinese Ponzi operation.
•At the time, it was barely noticed - just another asset seizure.
•Now, that same stash is worth over £5.4 billion.
•Instead of auctioning quietly or holding passively, the British government is considering deploying it to plug a fiscal black hole.
That’s the tell.
This transforms Bitcoin from “risky asset” to liquidity reserve of last resort.
Here’s what this really signals:
1. Bitcoin has entered the sovereign balance sheet schema.
It now occupies the same archetypal category as gold or foreign reserves - something a state can liquidate or mobilize to fill macro gaps.
2. This is reactive confirmation of Bitcoin’s strategic asset status.
No state sells its best assets to cover a hole unless:
•a) it views it as liquid,
•b) it recognizes it as valuable,
•c) it has few other options.
3. This signals a shift in state–asset reflexivity.
Once a government uses Bitcoin to solve a public fiscal problem, it sets a precedent. That precedent legitimizes the asset in the eyes of other states - not as a speculation, but as a structural hedge and backstop.
4. It accelerates the reflexive adoption curve.
The more this becomes normalized, the more other governments will:
•Seek to acquire BTC quietly,
•Reclassify it from “confiscated criminal asset” to “strategic reserve,”
•Justify accumulation or withholding under national interest.
In deep terms:
Britain just opened the door for the sovereign monetization of Bitcoin.
They may not know it.
They may think it’s just plugging a hole.
But history will see this moment as something else entirely.
A Western government reached into the digital vault.
Not because they believed.
Because they had to.
And that’s when belief spreads fastest.
When survival borrows from truth.
English

@BGatesIsaPyscho Now we know why these guys are so keen to be regularly visiting Kiev :)
English

🚨 RIPPLE CEO BRAD GARLINGHOUSE:
„HAS EVERYBODY THOUGHT ABOUT WHY YOU GET PAID ONCE A MONTH OR ONCE EVERY 2 WEEKS?
IT COMES DOWN TO THE FRICTION OF PAYMENTS. AND IF WE CAN REMOVE THE FRICTION OF PAYMENTS, WHY CAN’T YOU GET PAID EVERY DAY? OR EVERY HOUR? OR EVERY SECOND?“ #XRP
English

@DiedSuddenly_ Most people got the vax, most people are fine.
English

@elonmusk It's great but can we please have grok with the voice of Holly from Red Dwarf?
youtu.be/vLm6oTCFcxQ?si…

YouTube
English

Try Grok voice, it’s awesome 😎
Mike Russell@imikerussell
Grok's unhinged voice? Ultimate procrastination killer. Seriously.
English

@Starmers1984 @10DowningStreet Theres a reason Larry Fink and Bill Gates met twotier recently.
English

So a house has a maximum potential EPC rating of D.
Property comes up for re-mortgage.
Mortgage lender will only offer buy-to-let mortgages for houses with A or B ratings
Landlord has to sell.
Blackrock buys the house. And all the others
Blackrock whacks rents up
The same lending rules gradually get applied to people that own their own mortgaged homes.
And this is how net zero destroys the rental sector and home ownership.
You will own nothing.
English

Which #Altcoins shall I post tomorrow for some updates?
English

Or
1. **First Equation:**
- Three sets of earphones = 30
- Therefore, one set of earphones = 30 / 3 = 10
2. **Second Equation:**
- Two people + one set of earphones = 20
- Since one set of earphones = 10, then two people = 20 - 10 = 10, so one person = 5
3. **Third Equation:**
- Three sets of handcuffs + one person = 13
- Since one person = 5, then three sets of handcuffs = 13 - 5 = 8, so one set of handcuffs = 8 / 3 ≈ 2.67
4. **Final Equation:**
- One earphone + one person - one set of handcuffs = ?
- One earphone = 10 / 2 = 5
- One person = 5
- One set of handcuffs ≈ 2.67
Therefore, the equation becomes:
- 5 (one earphone) + 5 (one person) - 2.67 (one set of handcuffs) = 7.33
So, the answer to the final equation is approximately **7.33**. However, since IQ test answers typically prefer whole numbers, let's consider if there's another interpretation:
- If we treat the symbols more abstractly, maybe the earphone and handcuff symbols could represent different values or operations. But based on the given information, the arithmetic seems straightforward.
Thus, with the provided symbols and values, **7.33** remains the calculated answer. If there's an expectation for a whole number, further context or different symbolic interpretations might be needed, but based on arithmetic:
**Final Answer:** **7.33** or if whole numbers are expected, consider re-evaluating the symbolic representations for a simpler whole number solution.
English

@uktruthsociety @ZiaYusufUK You got no response, 100% packet loss
English














