Caleb ☧

This amazing song showing the contrast between YHWH 🔥 and JESUS 🫂 is now on YouTube, Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee! Links in bio. The more people see the truth about YHWH, the better, and I hope this helps.

Just noticed this video no longer embeds properly in the X app — it used to play inline. Others' videos work fine, but mine doesn't. Has it been censored somehow? It still plays if you click the link, just not inline like before. Is this the same for you?

For there is no good tree that produceth corrupt fruit; nor corrupt tree that produceth good fruit. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:43) This core saying in the New Testament exposes YHWH's flawed character through his Law’s “bad fruit” (violence, curses, contradictions), contrasting sharply with the wholly good Father God revealed in Christ.

Modern Christians freak out at the plain Hebrew of Elohim (plural, a class of divine beings) in the Hebrew Bible, screaming "You don't understand the Bible!" or blaming "bad translations" — all while dodging the actual Hebrew text. The irony is strong. In the Divine Council worldview (Psalm 82; Deut 32:8-9; Heiser's and Biglino's analysis), Elohim aren't a singular "God" in the later monotheistic sense. Elyon (the Most High) presides over a council of sons of God/Elohim — powerful spiritual beings assigned nations, some rebellious (Watchers, etc.). YHWH is one of them, allotted Israel. This isn't fringe — it's the ancient Near Eastern context, backed by the text, DSS, and Enochian material. Ignoring it flattens the Bible into modern assumptions and leaves you blind to what's coming: the powers of darkness, delegitimised rulers, and cosmic realignment. Grasping the Council view unlocks the Bible as it is — and the story still unfolding. It's time to read the Hebrew on its own terms

Context doesn't spiritualise it away. The Hebrew Bible presents Elohim/YHWH as embodied members of a divine class — not a lone abstract spirit using "figurative" language. Stavrakopoulou's God: An Anatomy documents this exhaustively: elders literally "saw the God of Israel" with feet on a sapphire pavement (Exod 24:9-10); YHWH walks in the garden (Gen 3:8); the temple is "the place for the soles of my feet" where he resides (Ezek 43:7). These aren't metaphors detached from ANE reality — they're concrete depictions of a physical deity. Hamori's God's Monsters and Heiser's work further show the violent, active "monstrous" physicality of these powers — destroying angels, hybrid beings, divine hitmen under YHWH's command — all operating in embodied terms, not ethereal symbolism. Later interpreters imposed singularity and immateriality. The raw Hebrew text, read in its ancient context, doesn't.

@meCal3b When read in context, ‘Elohim’ refers to the one God of Israel, and physical descriptions of God are figurative language, not literal biology.

YHWH wasn't a disembodied "spirit" — he was a physical, non-human Elohim. The Hebrew shows Elohim (incl. YHWH) as flesh-and-blood beings from a group of powerful entities — not omnipotent supernatural God. They walked, ate, smelled sacrifices, flew in vehicles (ruach/kavod), had offspring, and interacted physically with humans. The Hebrew Bible portrays YHWH with body parts — feet on the ground, hands, etc. — in concrete ANE terms, not abstract spirit. Later theology spiritualised him. The text shows otherwise.

Spot on. Hebrew nihoah in Gen 8:21 is no metaphor; it’s the literal smell of roasting meat hitting their nostrils.

@meCal3b He smelled aroma of the food he was going to eat for goodness sake

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): Commands the slaughter of the Amalekites, “kill both man and woman, child and infant” (1 Samuel 15:3). Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:27-28). The Elohim of Israel demands genocidal violence; the alien Good God reveals perfect love and mercy for all. Judge the fruit.

@keepklikkn In that regards, who can blame him? 🙈💩

@meCal3b Yeah, he couldn't tolerate walking through Hebrew poo poo

Not idolising any man — Trobisch is just one scholar highlighting what patristic sources already show: Marcion’s Evangelion + Apostolicon came first, and the larger NT was edited in response. No single “man” invented that history; it’s textual evidence. Jer 17:5 (“Cursed is the man who trusts in man”) cuts both ways. I’m not trusting any human for salvation — I’m letting the earliest texts speak plainly, without later orthodox agenda blending YHWH with the Good Father. The Spirit of truth doesn’t fear evidence; dogma does.

@meCal3b That name again... There is no one man I can give credit to for putting together what I believe in; the Spirit that gives me the strength to continue every day. You rely on this man who I've never heard of. An idol? Interesting that Jeremiah 17:5 is the next page I was led to...

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “I form light and create darkness; I make peace and create evil” (Isaiah 45:7). Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly” (John 10:10). The Elohim of Israel authors evil and death; the alien Good God sends His Son for life and mercy alone. Judge the fruit.

"First and Last" doesn't prove Jesus = YHWH. Isaiah 44:6: YHWH (LORD of Heavenly Armies) claims it — classic jealous creator language (cf. Isa 45:5-7). Revelation 1:17 applies it to the risen "son of man" (Jesus). But Revelation is a later Judaized text heavily drawing on Daniel 7 (and Enoch). It reframes titles for Christ in Divine Council contrast, not identity. Ego eimi ("I am") is ordinary Greek (Jn 6:20; 9:9). John 8:58 highlights pre-existence, not Exodus 3:14. Where does Jesus himself ever say he or his Father is YHWH? Show the direct quote from the Evangelion or even the canonical Gospels.

@AndySimedik That isn't what the text or context shows. x.com/meCal3b/status…

@meCal3b Before Abraham was born I Am YHWH > I Am That I Am

@AndySimedik Jesus (Iēsous) never said the Father/God of Israel was His Father or Himself.

@meCal3b Jesus is YHWH

Isaiah 57 nails the antithesis. YHWH exposes worthless works, mocks idols, and offers conditional land to trusters (YHWH-logic: Law, reward, judgment). Jesus reveals the alien Good Father: unconditioned grace and life abundant (Jn 10:10), not merger with the Elohim’s wrath (Isa 45:7, Rev 2). No “different Bibles” strawman either — I use the same one, but the evidence shows Marcion’s First NT (Evangelion + Apostolicon) came first. The current canon was largely a reaction to it (per David Trobisch: Gospels, Acts, expanded Paulines, Catholic epistles, Revelation shaped with anti-Marcionite agenda). First NT keeps the distinction. Different sources, different fruit. Judge by it.

@meCal3b thou criest, let thy companies deliver thee; but the wind shall carry them all away; vanity shall take them: but he that putteth his trust in me shall possess the land, and shall inherit my holy mountain...."

@yellowbee0 Nah, not twisting—just quoting the texts. If Isaiah 45:7 ("I create evil") and John 10:10 ("I came that they may have life abundantly") aren't showing two different gods, then whose fruit is the evil and death in this world coming from? The Good Father or YHWH?

@meCal3b U twist the Truth

Fair point on the mission phase, but it reinforces the antithesis. John 12:47-49 and Matt 26:53 show Jesus during his earthly mission refusing judgment and legions of angelic wrath—precisely because he reveals the alien Good Father, not the creator's violent ways (cf. Isa 45:7). His "not judging now" isn't temporary delay of YHWH-style punishment; it's the nature of the wholly good God who sends life, not death (Jn 10:10). Hebrews 5:8-9 is later orthodox redaction, not in the First NT's pure Pauline gospel. The stauros accomplished deliverance from this YHWH-ruled world, not merger with its wrath. The Good Father isn't biding time for child-killing or tribulation (Rev 2); that's the Elohim of Israel. Jesus' mission exposed the contrast. Judge the fruit.

@meCal3b John 12:47-49 is the reason for the lack of wrath. He was sent on a mission which He accomplished, Heb 5:8-9. Matthew 26:53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?

Mate, that's exactly the point. This world—slavery, taxes, plutocrats, wars, dead kids—is under YHWH/the Elohim of Israel (the god of this age, who forms light and creates evil, Isa 45:7). He's still running his domain of law, judgment and death. The alien Good Father is not of this world. He sent His Son to reveal mercy and deliverance from it. "Life abundant" isn't worldly utopia under YHWH—it's the promise of the age to come, rescue from this madhouse via the stauros and resurrection (Jn 10:10; 2 Cor 4:4). Seeing horror doesn't disprove the Good Father; it proves we need Him. Judge the fruit: one god authors the mess, the other offers escape.

@meCal3b We don’t really have either bro, unless life abundantly means slavery, taxes, oppression by plutocrats and all the other horrible things that happen down here. YWHW is still in control of this world. I tried to find the good father but instead see 6 month old kids killed by IDF

Revelation is rightly excluded from the First NT as a later anonymous apocalyptic rehash of Daniel—full of Judaized YHWH wrath (e.g. Rev 2:22-23's punitive child-killing)—with none of the pure grace and life-abundant fruit of the Good Father revealed in the Evangelion and Apostolicon.

@meCal3b Is the book of Revelation excluded from your bible also? Rev 2:22-23 sounds a lot like the God you speak against. Job 38 ... Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me...

In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, when Pilate was governing Judea, Jesus came down to Capharnaum, a city of Galilee. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 3:1) This abrupt opening of the First New Testament’s Gospel emphasises the sudden intrusion of the Stranger from the Good Father into YHWH’s world—no preparatory prophecies or genealogies, just direct revelation in power.

@JayDyer You’d rather be like the church fathers than Jesus (Iēsous)?

People who assume all insults and invective are "not Christ-like" immediately show their unfamiliarity with the Church Fathers who frequently used insults against their opponents in their *heated debates.* x.com/i/grok/share/d…