@Th_Angelopoulos You're a clown, Thanos. An absolute clown.
Actually you debate all of those things.
Perhaps you mean you don't have the intellectual and/or moral ability to do so? x.com/i/status/20669…
GIF
English
Ree
14.1K posts
Any inquiry that wants to be accurate in its hard data has to meet basic methodological standards. This one seems to fail meeting them.
You cannot estimate a national figure from Rotherham and Telford, because those towns were not chosen at random. They were investigated precisely because they were known to be among the worst.
Generalising from cases selected on their outcome is called selection bias, sampling on the dependent variable, and it is one of the first errors any researcher is trained to avoid. It does not produce a national estimate. It produces a guess dressed as one.
A real national figure comes from a national dataset. We have one. It does not say 250,000, and it does not say "primarily Pakistani Muslim." It is incomplete, it carries caveats, it is not perfect, but it is a national count. This report has no national count. It has two local inquiries and an extrapolation, which is the very thing that fails.
As for the question underneath: the acceptable number of children abused is zero. For Pakistani men, for Black men, for white men who are the largest recorded group, for everyone.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio@LeoKearse
1,400 girls in Rotherham, 1,000 girls in Telford THAT WE KNOW OF. These are just two towns in Britain. You can imagine the scale across the whole country but the far left still push this idea that it's just a handful of incidents. Also, what is the acceptable number of British children gang raped by Pakistani men?
English
Ree أُعيد تغريده
250,000 British girls raped.
Starmer refused to prosecute as head of the CPS.
Starmer refused to close the border.
Starmer called you a racist.
And now his solution will be more DEI and Digital ID. And you know it.
English
GIF
English
@libsoftiktok You are talking absolute piss
x.com/i/status/20671…
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.
English
The UK rape gang inquiry report just dropped and it should make your blood boil:
1. At least 250,000 young White girls were groomed, raped, trafficked, and tortured.
2. Perpetrators followed consistent tactics of befriending vulnerable girls as young as 11 with gifts, drugs, and alcohol before subjecting them to group rapes, violence, blackmail, pregnancies, forced conversions, and trafficking.
3. UK institutions—including police, social services, schools, NHS, and politicians—catastrophically failed victims through denial, ignored reports, criminalization of victims, destruction of evidence, and prioritization of political correctness and fears of “racism” accusations over child protection.
4. 87–95% of convicted perpetrators in group-based child sexual exploitation cases were Muslim. It was predominantly Muslim Pakistani gangs. They operated across 149 local authority districts. Groups from Somali,
Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.
5. The Muslim perpetrators operated under an honour- and
shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially White working class girls, as property available for sexual use. Girls were told that they’re “White trash” who deserved punishment.
People need to go to prison for this.
English
@Th_Angelopoulos @RestoreBritain This you, Thanos? You complete & utter clown. x.com/i/status/20669…
English
@RestoreBritain Balls? Nah. It takes what appears to be fabricated numbers:
x.com/i/status/20671…
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.
English
For holding his rape gang inquiry, Rupert Lowe has received endless abuse and countless death threats.
He did it because nobody else would.
Whatever you think of Rupert's politics, that takes balls.
English
GIF
English
@PaulWillia87714 I don't block you, I disabled comments in general. If I had blocked you, you wouldn't be able to RT this. 0 dishonesty in my claims.
English
Of course, he blocked me after being called out, so I can't respond to his other dishonest claims.
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
You say offences aren't victims, the real total is higher, and ethnicity was missing for most suspects. Fine. Grant all three, as hard as they'll go, and use your own preferred direction: the biggest, newest figure. December 2025 police report: 4,450 group-based CSAE offences in 2024. Say each hides ten real victims. Stretch it across 25 years. That's over a million victims, all ethnicities. Now split it by the police's own ethnicity data from 2025. Pakistani suspects are 13.7% of group cases. White suspects are 63%. So on the very assumptions that get you to 250,000 for one group, the same maths puts white offenders, the largest recorded group, at well over half a million. Four to five times higher. That's the trap. To make his number big enough, you have to make the white number bigger still. So either the figure is inflated, or it's real and the far larger problem is the one his report never names. Either way, "primarily Pakistani Muslim" is the one thing the data won't carry. Police report: vkpp.org.uk/vkpp-work/anal…
English
@Th_Angelopoulos Actually you debate all of those things.
Perhaps you mean you don't have the intellectual and/or moral ability to do so?
English
There's 0 need to engage with someone like this Young Bob muppet. Zero.
He is a rage baiting for grifting.
Now, because he is on GB News describing himself as a victim of political violence, the discourse demands sympathy and engagement. This is not his model breaking. This is his model working exactly as designed.
I made the basic point in March: x.com/i/status/20303….
The full argument is here: x.com/i/status/20648…
The Charlie Kirk-style debate stand is a content machine. Its product is filmed confrontation.
The “debate” is the bait, the footage is the harvest. The X ecosystem behind him then amplifies it because the algorithm does not distinguish hostile engagement from supportive engagement.
An angry quote tweet, a dunking reply, even my own screenshots, all push his content further into the For You feeds of persuadable users.
The algorithm only sees engagement. Outrage and approval count the same.
What happened in Manchester, then GB News with Patrick Christys, produced exactly the footage and the platform he needed.
Do not engage. Discourage others from engaging. Block, scroll past, starve the machine.
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
New on Substack: How to Beat the Algorithmic Fascist Beast Rupert Lowe posted one word and got sixty million views. Here's why that number is a lie, and what you can do about it: X's algorithm does not read sentiment. It reads engagement. Your angry reply is algorithmically identical to a supportive one. Every dunk, every quote-tweet, every "can you believe this" is rocket fuel for the content you oppose. Peer-reviewed research in PNAS, ACM FAccT, and a MDPI systematic review of 30 studies all confirm X's algorithm amplifies right-wing content by default. The PNAS study found this replicated across seven countries. A pre-registered experiment (Milli et al., 2025, PNAS Nexus) found the algorithm amplifies "emotionally charged, out-group hostile content" that users themselves say they don't want to see. The algorithm overrides your preferences. Analysis of the 2026 open-sourced code found that mass blocking acts as a negative quality signal: "If many people block you, the algorithm treats it as a quality signal and reduces your distribution more broadly". Based on these documented mechanics, mass blocking would collapse engagement rates, degrade algorithmic quality scores, and sever the pipeline that pushes far-right content into centrist feeds. This applies to the whole network: Lowe, Farage, Reform, Restore Britain, Tate, Robinson, GB News, and every mid-tier amplification node in between. The far right needs your outrage. Without it, sixty million becomes a fraction. The algorithm only runs if you feed it. Block. Mute. Don't engage. Starve the machine. And more importantly, take action in the real world.
English
1,400 girls in Rotherham, 1,000 girls in Telford
THAT WE KNOW OF.
These are just two towns in Britain. You can imagine the scale across the whole country but the far left still push this idea that it's just a handful of incidents.
Also, what is the acceptable number of British children gang raped by Pakistani men?
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.
English
GIF
English
1/ A 🧵 of questions for the Centre for Social Justice About the 27:1 Ratio
I read the @csjthinktank's press release yesterday on the 27:1 ratio: 27 non-EU migrants hired for every young British worker since 2020. The methodology footnote cites HMRC's payrolled employments dataset by nationality, age and sex.
I often look at labour market data for my PhD, though my research is qualitative, not econometric. I may be reading these numbers incorrectly and I am happy to be corrected. But I downloaded the HMRC data tables to look at the underlying figures, and I found several things in the data that are not in the press release.
The CSJ's arithmetic is correct. The NEET crisis is real. However, I would genuinely like to understand, what I understand to be, the following omissions below.
The Centre for Social Justice@csjthinktank
Alan Milburn’s NEETs Review is out. It’s a powerful diagnosis of youth unemployment. Our research shows that since 2020, for every British young person hired, 27 young non-EU migrants were employed. Find out more here👇
English
For fuck's sake.
You don't debate fascism.
You don't debate racism.
You don't debate exclusion.
You don't debate war.
You don't debate genocide.
You don't debate capitalism.
You don't debate imperialism.
You don't debate bodily autonomy.
You don't debate abortion.
You don't debate the time limit.
You don't debate contraception.
You don't debate buffer zones.
You don't debate whether someone keeps their home because of their passport.
You don't debate whether someone is deported for not speaking English.
You don't debate whether settled migrants get to stay.
You don't debate whether refugees get asylum.
You don't debate family reunion.
You don't debate stripping citizenship from dual nationals.
You don't debate leaving the ECHR.
You don't debate whether a disabled person is fit for work.
You don't debate PIP.
You don't debate cutting universal credit.
You don't debate sanctions and conditionality.
You don't debate the right of trans people to exist as they are.
You don't debate the right to live as who they are.
You don't debate access to the healthcare that affirms it.
(Sports, provision, trans only/cis only specific spaces are a separate practical conversation. Trans people's rights are not up for debate).
You don't debate the right to organise.
You don't debate the right to strike.
You don't debate the repeal of every anti-union law since Thatcher.
You don't debate mandatory union recognition.
You don't debate sectoral collective bargaining.
You don't debate the living wage.
You don't debate public ownership of water, energy, rail, the NHS, Royal Mail, buses, broadband, social care.
You don't debate mass council housebuilding.
You don't debate rent controls.
You don't debate ending short term lets.
You don't debate taxing wealth.
You don't debate a land value tax.
You don't debate equalising capital gains with income tax.
You don't debate windfall taxes on energy and arms profits.
You don't debate redistribution.
You assert. You organise. You hold. You enforce.
By every means available to a movement that intends to win.
Enough with this performative nonsense.
Thanos Angelopoulos@Th_Angelopoulos
The second tier of the machine is the willing opponent. @blondepraxis, a Cambridge Union leftist, sharing his event poster with “what an ad” is not opposing the content engine. She is performing the role of the legitimate left challenger the Charlie Kirk format requires. “The Cambridge progressive versus the Christian remigration activist at Headstone on 20 June” is not a debate. It is a co-produced piece of right-wing content. Do not engage. Discourage others from engaging. Block, scroll past, starve the machine.
English
One of the most important moments in my role as Technology Secretary.
Protecting children isn’t optional — it’s a priority.
And I’m determined to make sure every child gets the childhood they deserve.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology@SciTechgovuk
A big moment at @10DowningStreet 📸 @Keir_Starmer set out plans to ban social media platforms from providing services to under 16s - bringing together parents and campaigners. Putting power back into parents’ hands 👏
English
I want there to be a cultural shift and lasting change for future generations when it comes to young people’s experiences of social media. Since day one in my role at Tech Secretary, keeping children safe online has been my top priority.
English
Parents have been crying out for support when it comes to their children being on social media. So that’s why we’ve made this big decision – to put power back in to parents’ hands, and to give children their childhood back.
English
Ree أُعيد تغريده
Which is worse, raping someone or using political power to either allow or ignore the rape of 250,000 children?
English
@ScottRanda39328 @peterboghossian Your whole account is replying to Peter.
Are you a clown or just completely stupid?
GIF
English
@peterboghossian Boghossian calls for the death penalty based on an advocacy report cited by Billboard Chris with no context or examination of the actual report. He’s been calling for death quite often lately. Wonder what’s up with that?
English
If this is not worthy of the death penalty, what would be?
Billboard Chris 🌎@BillboardChris
"While Sir Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions, it has been reported that 13,000 suspected rape gang members and paedophiles were let off with warning letters."
English
@KirstieMAllsopp The algorithm has nothing to do with your hot, shit takes. You're an embarrassment.
English
The Twitter algorithm is so off at the moment it is crazed, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to wade through the mire.
English
Caller Steve thinks he's got the upper hand over @NickFerrariLBC.
But he didn't account for one thing: Nick's magic button...
English
This is a new low. These were sent through the contact form on the website for The Survivors. They’ve literally navigated past pages of text talking about the need to properly support survivors and collect evidence responsibly, to hurl abuse at me.
English
This is so low.
One of the survivors said on a space that they wanted to have a picnic in the park because they were scared of venturing out of their house by themselves. I said they shouldn't feel scared to go out, and that if a gathering of people would help them, we should look at doing it.
I've also literally run a retreat for survivors focused on wellness, avoiding the traditional therapy route (which, it's true, doesn't work), which had outstanding success in helping survivors feel more at ease. The money I fundraised went on that retreat - plus £3k of my own money.
Also, Adam has my number so could have just called me to discuss, rather than slandering me.
Adam Wren@aswren
When she was kicked out of the inquiry last year she held a space asking for money. I suggested a good idea for a project in the space, if someone wants to do something would be raising to introduce and promote the only kind of therapy that seems to work for survivors, which is a kind of cult reprogramming protocol developed in the US Midwest but that isn’t available at all here (even privately), instead of the mixed bag of results that you get with CBT/DBT. She dismissed this and said her intention was to ‘take back the streets’ by having picnics with survivors in the middle of Bradford. I asked if she’d ever been to Bradford, or even met a survivor and can imagine why they wouldn’t want to do this and she basically just dismissed me and said if their match/picnic gets attacked they’ll link hands and stand in a protective circle around them lol There’s probably a recording of it somewhere
English
@Dr_Scissorhands Accusing me falsely.
You're literally defending a millionaire who used survivor testimonies for his own political gain.
English