Trulyobjective1

Just like you get a bogus result when you count someone as unvaccinated for the act of receiving another additional dose. The only thing this does is count all injuries and deaths from the vaccine as unvaccibared. It has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the vaccine to protect from the virus.

@Dvet08 @trulyobjective @tommysantos14 But if in analyzing something’s effectiveness you look include a time frame when it couldn’t be effective you get bogus, meaningless results.

Right, Adam. It's not like don't we have data showing the death rates among vaccinated versus unvaccinated during the pandemic. 🤡

I do understand how vaccines work. That is why I also understand after effectively studying vaccines effectiveness, the ACT of receiving another dose has never declassified someone as unvaccinated. Studies have had treatments where a vaccine can expire if a booster is not administered in a defined period of time. In other cases, a full series of shots could be required before immunization is recognized. This is the only time when receiving another dose regardless of schedule declassified you and the ONLY reason you would do this is to manipulate the data to count any vaccine related injuries and deaths as unvaccinated.

@trulyobjective @tommysantos14 Why, when determining a vaccine’s effectiveness, would you treat someone as vaccinated when the vaccine hasn’t yet taken effect? It takes up to 14 days to work. But you knew that.

@mehdirhasan The rest of us Americans prefer to secure our country.

Beyond embarrassing

@ML3democrats Thankfully you did not find out wrong that statement is the hard way.

If Kamala Harris had become president of the United States, Trump would be in prison, the strait of Hormuz would be open, Ukraine would be victorious, gas would be under $3 a gallon, and the U.S. would STILL be respected and supported around the world.

@CorfmanTim The bottom 40% pay an effective federated rate of near 0% after credits and deductions. The wealthy such as Elon Musk who paid over $11 billion in personal income tax in one year are not the problem.

Billionaires pay an effective tax rate of 23% while the highest wage earners pay an effective tax rate of 45%. Having billionaires pay a higher effective tax rate is about equality, not theft.

@omgsidewalks Continue to show us you do not understand NET WORTH.

unpopular opinion: After you reach $999 million, every red cent goes to schools and health care. You get a trophy that says, “I won capitalism” and we name a dog park after you. no more billionaires.

@MetamateDaz You will freeze the cost of insurance, maintenance, prooerty taxes, labor to manage and repair the property, materials to operate business and home to make this possible?

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN: IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL for landlords to increase rent unless they're upgrading the apartment

@Damaan4u33 Hopefully that concern never becomes true.

@TheMG3D Another reason you can not tax unrealized gains.

It’s almost like it’s not worth that much

@RaniAiman12 $0

@1Nicdar Yes. Smaller government is literally one of the things we voted for.

Since President Trump took office, over 352K Federal employees have been fired, resigned, or retired and were not replaced. The Federal workforce is smaller today than at any point since 1966. Is this what you voted for? Yes or No?

@BeverlyWatt She has 0 chance of winning

If Michelle Obama would run for president, she would win in a landslide

Yes, these companies create jobs which reault in billion in collected taxes. Your other point is correct, we have one of the more advantageous corporate tax systems which brings innovation and companies with high paying jobs into the US vs other advanced nations which tax companies away to foreign markets.

@trulyobjective @MetamateDaz Many of US’s largest/most profitable co.’s legally pay $0 in federal income taxes in some yrs. US collects less revenue from corp income taxes as a % of GDP than most other advanced economies. Between 1978-2023 pay of top CEOs increased 1,085% while workers’ pay only grew by 24%.

TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS DIDN'T WORK "tax the rich" is NOT a new concept, it was the norm before Reagan we've been psyopsed into never questioning the rich and powerful

The Democrats would have continued flood this country will millions more illegal immigrants. Additionally they would have continued pushing agendas which destroy society. The Iran situation is an unfortunate one however we as a nation would be in FAR worse shape if she had been voted into office.

@trulyobjective @ZacksJerryRig Not really. Dems do fuck all but pretend they do shit. At most they would have just pandered for four years and left. Republicans still would have had every other branch in the government. But we wouldnt have paid 300 billion to get Iran to tarriff us

The lady with the funny laugh was going to give Americans buying their first homes $25,000 each... and it would cost 100 billion over 10 years. Trump just gave 3X that amount to Iran. 👍

@_DaBearsJannix @ZacksJerryRig That is not even close to what I said. I said this country is in much better shape than it would have been had she won the election It certainly is.

@trulyobjective @ZacksJerryRig Iran never taxed ships in Hormuz. In fact we are paying them 300 billion to tariff us. And yet its Bidens fault?

@JamieBonkiewicz If you can not understand the effective supporting the delusions of mentally ill people has on society, I whole heartedly believe you have been able to earn $0 dollars in life.

If I had a dollar for every time a trans person negatively affected my life, I’d have zero dollars.

@DarrigoMelanie Absolutely. Be sure to remember that and the fact the vast majority of billionaires have been supporting and donating to Democrats in every election.

Elon Musk donated $277 million to elect Trump. Trump let him gut the IRS. Elon’s SpaceX took a $1.9 billion tax break that they believed wouldn’t be allowed if the IRS audited them. Your reminder that billionaire and corporate PAC donations are bribes. itep.org/elon-musk-spac…

@ewarren Bow show Biden's impact where inflation averaged over 5% throught his term nd peaked over 9%. Do not leave out the part where homes increased in price by 50%+

Gas prices: +40.5% Airfares prices: +26.7% Electricity prices: +5.9% Medical care services: +3.6% Housing costs: +3.4% Groceries prices: +2.7% What’s driving higher prices? Trump’s disastrous policies.

@grantbelden Whether those companies retain their value, he has revolutionized both industries beating the largest and wealthiest companies in the world in both endeavors.

@trulyobjective Nope Not for long

Elon Musk is the first trillionaire But if both of his companies disappeared today, the world wouldn’t be a materially different place Humanity wouldn’t be any better off Worth thinking about