vanurninho ☧
24.9K posts


Featuring a surprise cameo from one of my favorite historical figures:
Jimmy Akin's Mysterious World@mys_world
A secret 1934 manuscript of the Anna Ecklund exorcism was never meant for public eyes. It reveals far more than the published account ever did. What was kept hidden — and why? #CatholicMystery #Exorcism With @jimmyakin3000 and @bettnet. Discussion in replies.
English
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

I feel compelled to return to this argument once more to dispel what I believe is a significant myth regarding Pope Leo XIV.
Compared with all other 12 popes of the post-1870 era, beginning with his namesake Leo XIII, the current Pope is far from a political or even religious 'left-wing extremist'. If you do not believe me, believe their written records.
Benedict XV, the pope who denounced Socialism as 'the enemy of the Church', also instituted the International Catholic Day for Migrants and Refugees, consistently condemned the First World War from the moment of his election, and coined the famous definition of WWI as 'the useless slaughter' in his international exhortation to all belligerent sides of 1st August 1917.
Pius X, recognised as the foremost anti-modernist and intransigent conservative among modern popes, condemned Italy's exploitation of religion in the war against Turkey, and wrote the encyclical Lacrimabili Statu denouncing the violent mistreatment of South American indigenous populations by their governments.
Pius XI, a deeply underrated figure, whilst bitterly opposing communism and socialism, openly attacked Nazi racial ideology in Mit Brennender Sorge , and at his personal request the Congregation for Seminaries and Universities issued on 13th April 1938 the Syllabus against Racism , distributed to Catholic schools worldwide, the timing of which, falling precisely during Hitler's state visit to Rome, was hardly accidental. He also opposed rearmament and war consistently. All this notwithstanding the fact that Pius XI personally harboured traditional Catholic prejudices and had initially sought an accommodation with Hitler upon his coming to power in 1933.
Pius XII remains perhaps the most problematic of recent popes, owing to his failure to condemn Nazism and the Holocaust with sufficient strength and clarity — a failing serious enough to halt and restart his canonisation process on several occasions. And yet even he consistently condemned war and the concept of armed aggression.
And one need hardly dwell on John XXIII ; Mater et Magistra on workers' rights and social justice, Pacem in Terris on the repudiation of war, or on John Paul II. Even Paul VI, a reserved, traditional and extraordinarily cautious figure, penned "Populorum Progressio", acknowledging the right of poor nations to development and emancipation, and explicitly condemning the concept of private property as an unconditional right when others lack bare necessities.
So there is nothing extreme in what Leo XIV has said over the past few days. It is, once again, the continuation of Catholic doctrine as it has evolved over the past two centuries.
What has changed is not the Church. It is the world around it that has shifted so far in one direction that the mere desire for peace, the condemnation of violence and abuse, and the refusal to allow religion to be exploited for political ends are now labelled 'dangerous extremism'.
English
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

Bro unironically worships tung tung tung sahur lmao
GIF
Brother Bjorn@bjorn_brother
>"your gods are dead!1!!" >Theres literally one living in my house
English
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

“120 Cardinals elected Pope Leo.
77 million American citizens elected Donald Trump.
We aren’t the same”
TMK@themagaking
120 Cardinals elected Pope Leo. 77 million American citizens elected Donald Trump. One was chosen by religious elites behind closed doors. The other was chosen by the American people. We are not the same.
English
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

@matheuszome @ivanildoiii Então esqueça os Estados Unidos. Lá tem essa mesma conversa de falta de representatividade por parte dos estados mais populosos.
Português

Como dizia Everardo Backheuser, federalismo só funciona em países cujas UFs sejam "equipotentes". Basta ver como são as UFs dos EUA, Suíça, etc. Um Amazonas e um Sergipe lado a lado não podem virar federação.
Para ser uma federação, o Brasil teria que redesenhar inteiramente seu mapa político, com UFs equipotentes - isso inclui dividir algumas (Guanabara pode entrar aí) e juntar outras (o Nordeste mesmo tem que ser totalmente redesenhado, com várias fusões e agregações). (Backheuser faz umas propostas interessantes em "Problemas do Brasil", mas isso 90 anos atrás.)
Português

Eu acho difícil ter qualquer federalismo enquanto Norte e Nordeste mandarem a maioria dos senadores mesmo morando muito menos gente por lá.
O Sudeste concentra 44% da população e manda 12 senadores de 81. A desproporção também ocorre no número de deputados. A pior parte é que a correção disso jamais vai passar no Congresso. Por que destruiriam o sistema que os beneficia?
Só existe uma solução.
Tem que dividir SP em três estados. Fazer a Guanabara voltar a ter três senadores. Enfim, dá pra fazer ocorrer. Nem que seja temporariamente só pra isso.
Português
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

Bandeira de Israel kkkkk
Tanka o protestantismo Br?
Notícias Paralelas@NP__Oficial
🚨 GOSPEL l Culto tem hino nacional, desfile militar e entrada triunfal da Arca da aliança
Português
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

“The Catholic Church never did anything for Venezuela, Trump did.”




Williams Cancino@williamscancino
La iglesia católica nunca hizo nada por Venezuela, Trump si. Team Trump. 💪🏻
English
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده
vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده

vanurninho ☧ أُعيد تغريده






















