rool🇵🇸

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ A virtuous circle can be employed in a valid argument, it's something like A=A. A viscious circle pressuposes the conclusion and is not valid.

I noticed you didn't explain virtuous vs. vicious circularity when that was a complaint of yours, now youre pretending you know about it. All while youre having to convince yourself its actually me who knows nothing. Deeply unserious stuff. Tell me the difference from the circularity, we arent moving on until I know you understand that.

The world is an example that humans are much more powerful than the concept of a god.

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ I don't really care to indulge in your analytic circle jerk and you can't command me to explain things to you. Just tell me how my argument is incorrect. You can't.

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Hey buddy, stop name dropping the name of things you learnt in logic 101 and think. How could you create an argument using reason if you don't believe in the foundations of reason? Sounds like you're pressuposing something...

@zer0oz7 @aimieeee___ You havent read anything jfc. What's the difference between a vicious circle and a virtuous circle? You tell me

@qu3stionevrthg @afzal_zara26257 @RehmanSid @araghchi And you're proud to nuke women and children? This is why everyone fucking hates you.

@afzal_zara26257 @RehmanSid @araghchi Because we can. We can literally bomb the shit out of Iran then blockade the strait until they “reopen” it up. We’ll be friends. Look at Japan. We dropped two nukes on them and we’re daddy. Domination is in our blood.

In line with the ceasefire in Lebanon, the passage for all commercial vessels through Strait of Hormuz is declared completely open for the remaining period of ceasefire, on the coordinated route as already announced by Ports and Maritime Organisation of the Islamic Rep. of Iran.

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Isn't your "refined" argument circular if you use reason to prove that the existence of God is the only thing that legitimizes reason? 🤣

Never said materialism is also atheism when the premises also account for them both specifically. You basically just admitted you didnt read it. No, this argument was refined in academia lmfao imagine being this incorrect. BTW the argument is you cant account for knowledge or logic or reasoning, which you havent done. So...

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Hey lil bro, Husserl accounted for almost everything you said without assuming God. This argument is nonsense and would get you laughed out of the room by any serious philosopher, it pressuposes that skepticism is impossible instead of defeating it. Also materialism =/= atheism.

@zer0oz7 @aimieeee___ Oh, you're seething you can't argue any of itwhich is what it says you'll do. Thanks for basically confirming the premises are correct.

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Are these the sort of arguments that deserve engaging with? It's hilarious that you call yourself a philosopher.

@zer0oz7 @aimieeee___ Why would your opinion matter me to me? You can't even engage with the discussion at hand. You instantly started insulting me.

@Ghost949687 Racist clown🤡

How dare pajeetas talk lol. So damn ugly theyre not allowed in their own movies 😭😭😭😭

@JustMeNee2 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Im not trans

@zer0oz7 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Transgenderism is a mental disorder, sweetie

Lovely spring day in the hellhole that is Minneapolis

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ You're s terrible philosopher you know?

@zer0oz7 @aimieeee___ I didn't, but even if i did, who cares? Doesn't mean a single thing in the discussion.

@pixiebonemeal @Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Really original from you...

@zer0oz7 @Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ You have a Palestine flag in your name and pronouns in your bio. No one gives a fuck what you think

@JustMeNee2 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Shush little dog

@zer0oz7 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Dude girl...stfu

@CamaroKirk @Eman_8282 You sound like a fucking loser

@Eman_8282 Now you just need the nose ring and your liberal costume is complete

@JustMeNee2 @BritCulp @NortonMpls You ran in here to harass a woman enjoying the outside

@zer0oz7 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Clearly, it makes a difference to you. Are you embarrassed? Not that I blame you, but you ran in here to call me a low life piece of shit because you look like a wannabe pygmy.

@JustMeNee2 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Literally who cares, what diference does it make for you?

@zer0oz7 @BritCulp @NortonMpls Nose ring checks out! 🤣

@JustMeNee2 @BritCulp @NortonMpls You're a real low life piece of shit

@BritCulp @NortonMpls

@NationOfEldia @bugscotti @LiminalAGI @rags2richesm8 @PLegalization @esaagar What tf is wrong with you. You're not helping Israels reputation here🤡

@bugscotti @LiminalAGI @rags2richesm8 @PLegalization @esaagar Hey little Irish naz*, I have a question: Why don’t you cry for Jordan to free pali? 🫤

Weed is literally killing humanity

@Vampyr_Bat @aimieeee___ Lil bro probably learnt what internal critique meant yesterday

@aimieeee___ The internal critique is that god would of made the world.. This is a strawman and bare assertion fallacy wrapped into one. Impressive

@Vampyr_Bat @6abygoat @iWuppp @wanfiller @kirawontmiss Hey lil bro, Husserl accounted for almost everything you said without assuming God. This argument is nonsense and would get you laughed out of the room by any serious philosopher, it pressuposes that skepticism is impossible instead of defeating it. Also materialism =/= atheism.

Okay. Here's a transcendental disjunctive argument. You asked for it. Good luck. Premise 1: The laws of logic, uniformity of nature, universals/abstract objects, objective morality, the reliability of senses/reason/memory, the existence of the self, identity over time, causation, and meaningful discourse are real and necessary preconditions for any knowledge, rational thought, science, ethics, or argumentation to be possible. Premise 2: These preconditions (transcendental categories) cannot be adequately accounted for or justified in a non-theistic (e.g., materialist, atheist, or naturalist) worldview, they reduce to brute facts, subjectivity, or absurdity (e.g., universals cannot be reduced to contingent matter; logic requires an immaterial, necessary foundation). Premise 3: The only worldview that coherently accounts for and grounds these preconditions is the existence of God (God as the necessary, omniscient, immaterial Mind/Logos in whom logic, universals, and order exist eternally and are imposed on creation). Conclusion: Therefore, God exists. (Without Him, knowledge, logic, and argumentation are impossible; the atheist who argues against God presupposes what only God can provide, this is often presented via "impossibility of the contrary.") Hopefully, 6abygoat has a degree in philosophy or epistemology, but this is what you asked for so there.

I genuinely can’t believe how anyone can see this and still think God isn’t real

@RMCF_blancoz @FCBayern You're the bitch and the thief, realdog

@FCBayern U will always be our bitches kids 😂 cant wait when psg thrashes hu guys

90 minutes at the Allianz Arena is a long time.