🚨For the past 5 years we argued that 230(c)(1) has been applied wrong! Almost all of the past precedent is flawed in one way or another. Despite two trips to SCOTUS, not one court allowed me so much as an oral argument despite being correct (now proven). The DOJ, Cruz and Paxton submitted Amicus briefs which said exactly what we said from the beginning - that 230(c)(1) was applied wrong. The 4th Circuit came to a similar conclusion that 230 was not applied as written. The 4th Cir relied heavily on a treatise from a guy who (of course) read all our prior legal briefs. We argued, in its current application, there is a conflict in the law. If 230(c)(1) protects all of the platform's own publication decisions (i.e., to allow, edit, or remove content), that would include restricting "otherwise objectionable" materials, which is the purpose of 230(c)(2). In other words, 230(c)(1) swallowed 230(c)(2) and became super immunity - i.e., 230(c)(1) rendered 230(c)(2) entirely superfluous / surplusage. We literally articulted such in the intro to our Supreme Court petition - [230(c)(1) renders 230(c)(2) superfluous / surplusage], front and center (See screenshot). Every single court gave us some illogical response and never addressed the real problem. The courts simply wouldn't fix 230 no matter what we said. I'm fact, I was denied so many time that the courts (i.e., the State -not Facebook) denied me of "all remedy for a legal right" - they denied me of my due process and first amendment rights. So, we filed a Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge which is catch 22 the court can't dismiss - its "not forfeitable." (See pinned post) Basically, the 5.1 says, if the court is somehow correct that 230(c)(1) protects "all publication decisions" (which is what most court believe - thats wrong) AND the "Good Samaritan" legislative guidance / intelligible principle DOESN'T APPLY to 230(c)(1) (which the courts determined on our second run to SCOTUS) then the statute is unconstitutional. 💥🤯 OR, the court is simply wrong that 230(c)(1) protects any publishing conduct at all. So, either the court is right in its application of 230(c)(1) and its unconstitutional or its wrong. Either way they are wrong. We proved 230(c)(1) is unconstitutional, but we just found a case that proves the court is just WRONG and we were right all along. It's the holy grail. Yesterday, we found an obscure case that Facebook attempted to SEAL, no doubt because a highly respected senior judge in the Northern District of California (a judge in the same court as mine) FINALLY GOT IT RIGHT! 💪 230(c)(1) cannot be a "backdoor" to protect content moderation decisions because that is the entire pupose of 230(c)(2) - it renders 230(c)(2) useless. Facebook should have brought a 230(c)(2) defense but instead relied on 230(c)(1) immunity which just blew up in their face and we found it. This case proves my decision was wrong, and given that we have an active motion 60(b) (a motion to overturn a mistaken decision), and a concurrent 5.1 Constitutional Challenge, it puts the courts in a situation where one court is wrong (mine), one court is right (this other case). One case is unconstitutional (mine) and the other is not. 230(c)(1) can never be applied as blanket immunity again. The courts are finally going to have to standardize the CORRECT application of Section 230, which will change the world. It will change the Internet as we know it. Big Tech is now open to liability for damn near everything they've done to promote winners and restrict losers in the social media game. But better yet, Facebook argued that the courts would open the flood gate if the court fixes it. But this HONORABLE JUDGE essentially said: "oh well you should have designed your algorithm so it wasn't illegal." Neutral platform, here we come! 🥳 For 5 years I was ridiculed, and dismissed. In reality, I was so far ahead of the world that what seemed crazy then, is actually genius now.

The University of Arizona CFO has resigned after misplacing $240 million

🚨🚨 Breaking! The Soros involved Edge Funders Alliance is partnered with the Alliance4EU from the CTI League Files! The Alliance4EU belongs to the DISARM Foundation and was responsible for bringing the DISARM Framework to life. The DISARM Framework is now used for government involved Global censorship!

EcoHealth Alliance currently is receiving $25 million in Department of Defense grants and contracts, despite having conspired to defraud the Department of Defense and likely having caused a pandemic that killed 20 million and cost $25 trillion.

🔥🔥Breaking! Since we are on a roll here exposing CREW who got Trump kicked off the presidential ticket, I figured why not find more? First, I found a job advertisement for Bonner group: Our full-time Senior Strategic Writer will help us build financial support for MEDIA MATTERS for America and its SISTER organizations, which include: ♦️ Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) 🔸The American Independent Institute 🔹The Franklin Forum Well this got me to looking around. The Franklin Forum had the same address as Crew too. So I looked around some more and found this! According to this petition, all of these shared the same address as CREW! “Audit David Brock's Media Matters Conglomerate” All of these share the same address: 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW 6th floor, Washington, DC 20001 ♦️Media Matters for America (501(c)3) 🔹Media Matters Action Network (501(c)4) 🔸Correct the Record (Super PAC) ♦️American Bridge 21st Century (Super PAC) 🔹Franklin Forum PAC 🔸American Bridge 21st Century Foundation (501(c)4) ♦️The Franklin Education Forum (501(c)3) 🔹The Franklin Forum (501(c)4) 🔸The American Independent (501(c)3) ♦️Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington DC (501(c)3) 🔹American Democracy Legal Fund (527 Committee) 🔸The Bonner Group (Professional Solicitor) ♦️American Priorities Joint Fundraising Committee 🔹Franklin Strategies LLC To date on my timeline, I have already proven that Media Matters, Crew, American Bridge, and the Franklin Forum have had the same addresses. So I will trust the others are correct. I have other things to expose. 🤭 PS. Recall that Correct the Record was special for Hillary’s campaign. All sources to follow.

🔥Breaking! The Bad Kitty Exposé Series Will Save The World Part 18! Strong new evidence that global censorship was created to fight right-wing populists! And as I already have shown you, funded by the EU! The now globally used Disarm framework, as mentioned in the CTI League Files, has multiple originating orgs. Alliance4EU was created to be an anti right wing, civic action org, used to create a global European Union! What you will see will be pretty damning for an org controlling censorship globally. 🔸Alliance4EU (A4E) “join” page before they grew massively: “The Brexit referendum & also the Trump election in the US are only some events that reverberated destructively across the European continent. The A4E mission is to form a pan-European network & support & cooperate with all organizations that work for a PROGRESSIVE & truly European spirit. From the Atlantic to the Carpathians & from the Arctic to the Mediterranean, a prosperous, democratic, integrated & value-based Europe could function as a model for the ENTIRE PLANET. A GLOBAL EUROPE.” ♦️Alliance4EU, “It’s time to fight together”: “Steve Bannon has a new goal. Two years ago, the right-wing political strategist helped Donald Trump get elected to the White House, now he wants to conquer Europe.” “He wants to destroy the EU, the guarantor of liberal democracy. If he succeeds, the nationalists in Europe would have won & the door would be open for autocratic rulers.” “As for Sonja Stuchtey, Bannon’s attack on the European Union even makes her think of the rise of Hitler: “It is comparable to the 1930s. To be able to better fight the right-wing populists stuchtey & Roeder together with activists from Poland, Italy, France, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Austria, Germany, & Great Britain, have founded a new organization: the Alliance4Eu.” “We said we need to do something together against the populists,” says Maia Mazurkiewicz, who experienced in her native Poland how a right-wing government can endanger European values. If the nationalists & the extreme right grow strong & sit in the European Parliament like an ulcer, the immune system is weakened. Everybody involved in Alliance4Eu is aware that the fight against the populists is a race against time” 🔹Alliance4Eu & the UNITED NATIONS Sustainable Development Goals: “Alliance4Europe and its partners & allies share a common commitment to values of democracy, the rule of law, human rights & sustainability as outlined in the European Union treaties & the Sustainable Development Goals.” 🔸SMIU Intelligence Used: “The goal is to bring together a range of actors from civil society, academia, governments, international orgs & the private sector, & address disinfo holistically & decisively. This network will bring together different approaches to disinfo and hate speech, from fact-checking to rebuttals, keyboard warriors, elves, positive messaging, to advocacy, through to education, life-long learning & awareness raising on media literacy and digital citizenship. To do this we have developed the Social Media Intelligence Unit. We enable democratic actors to be louder online to set a positive narrative countering disinfo. We are also building a network of actors working on disinfo among civil society, academia, think tanks, public & private sector actors to build up a large scale comprehensive holistic response to the issue. Applying approaches used by intelligence services. Enhance its data gathering & analytical capacities, (i.e. build up monitoring dash-board of key actors per country.)” ♦️Now let’s go to their original home page where they list their original network: “Together we can shape a new Europe!” 🛜Scientists for EU - anti Brexit 🛜The Good Lobby - equalized political power & influence 🛜The European Front - fights for liberal values using intelligence operations etc 🛜Pulse of Europe - assures EU remains United 🛜The Project for Democratic Union - wants a full political union of the Eurozone. TBC

BREAKING: SEC Complaint filed against Berkshire Hathaway yesterday following a shareholder being arrested (at a shareholder meeting) after questioning Warren Buffett’s relationship with Bill Gates and his ties to Jeffrey Epstein What Happened: The Chairman of the National Legal & Policy Center (NLPC), Peter Flaherty, was arrested after he questioned Buffett’s financial backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gates’ connections with Jeffrey Epstein. Despite being registered as an attendee and a shareholder, police in Omaha Nebraska charged Flaherty with criminal trespass, which led to him being held in detention for approximately 3 hours. Following his arrest, the counsel for the NLPC’s filed a complaint with the SEC, emphasizing the incident as a “clear demonstration of societal disparity.” The NLPC is urging the SEC to prevent Berkshire Hathaway from repeating such actions and to acknowledge them as violating rules. In addition to being a long time shareholder, Peter Flaherty shared that this was the first time he had ever been arrested for anything—and also first time he had his microphone cut-off during a proposal. - by Texas Lindsey.

Canada is sending $10 million to help youth unemployment in Iraq? How about unemployment and homelessness in Canada!? The Liberals are running a $40 billion dollar deficit! Taxes go up again January 1.

DEI LEAK: Executives from Pharma company Sanofi caught on leaked zoom call discussing discriminatory hiring practices: Carole Huntsman, Former Senior VP: “One in five hires NEEDS to be a black employee for us to meet our goals” … “One in ten HAS to be a Latinx employee.” This appears again to be a violation of title VII.