Bio.Science ∴

238 posts

Bio.Science ∴ banner
Bio.Science ∴

Bio.Science ∴

@1BioScience

∀ chemical transcendence ∞

pubmed Beigetreten Ağustos 2025
8 Folgt1.4K Follower
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
„Lemborexant? what’s that? I have Benzos or Magnesium bisglycinate“ Doctors being completely behind when it comes to pharmacology is a real problem. Especially when most use the medications they have learned about 30 years ago in their class
Morph@doctormorphh

its so stupid that pharmacology is behind such a big firewall honestly like doctor i want to sleep better can i get lemborexant? "no you have to score this number on my test first!" like i jus want better sleep doc

English
0
0
12
771
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
Psychedelics don't functionally silence the 5HT2A receptor tho. They activate it significantly more than it otherwise would and simply induce a biased downstream response. you're simply not comprehending the concept of biased agonism and confusing it with functional antagonism or even inverse agonism (?). With your logic SARMs would be functional antagonists in muscle tissue too because they displace testosterone and induce completely different downstream transcriptional responses which is simply showing a flawed understanding of the different types of receptor modulations
English
0
0
0
51
Jimmy Nelson
Jimmy Nelson@obntsdtd·
@1BioScience @aestheticprimal It’s a very similar situation as progestins which are technically “agonists” at PR, but owing to higher binding affinity and completely different transcriptional (among other) response it functionally antagonizes progesterone, reducing net pro-gestational signaling.
English
1
0
0
65
_aestheticprimal_
_aestheticprimal_@aestheticprimal·
5-HT2A agonism (psychedelics) beyond making you trip a lot are also quite useful when it comes to turning you into a subordinate (loser)
_aestheticprimal_ tweet media
_aestheticprimal_@aestheticprimal

5-HT (Serotonin) undeniably plays massive role in neuroplasticity and the promotion of creating new connections and breaking down old ones, especially regarding selective 5-HT2A agonists (MDT, LSD, Psilocybin) which can be tremendously beneficial when it comes to breaking down repetitive maladaptive coping behaviors (PTSD, OCD etc.) but take into account that what you're breaking down is not just maladaptive coping habits, but also your very own self-identity, we are meant to have loose screws, everyone that has ever created something meaningful in this world was fucked in the head. Stagnation much often doesn't require you to take a different approach/route, but rather to double down on your efforts and being stubborn enough to persist/continue The most probable reason as to why Serotonin gets released into the PFC from the Dorse Raphe Nucleus after organisms have given up in learned helplessness models is because Serotonin largely acts as a numbing agent, making you forget about your past self/past goals and allows you to form new goals and a new identity that doesn't need achievement of a particular goal you previously failed to achieve and thus inachievement of that goal also doesn't cause you psychological pain/stress. Take into account that the 5-HT2A receptor is the most implicated Serotonin receptor when it comes to neuroplasticity in the PFC regions, what are its main endogenous promoters? DMT (Dimethyltryptamine), which is produced by the body when it's under extreme hypoxic stress (near-death experiences for example) Serotonin, which rises when you 'give up', when animals hibernate, and on a high-Tryptophan diet (linked to accelerated aging) Doesn't seem like a good thing

English
7
4
71
6.9K
Jimmy Nelson
Jimmy Nelson@obntsdtd·
@1BioScience @aestheticprimal It is oppositional activity. But this is just total garf and I’m too bored to pick it apart. Unsurprising from an account still promoting omega 3 among other things.
English
1
0
0
60
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
serotonin is not even capable of accessing intracellular 5ht2a, so your logic doesn’t even apply there. Regarding the extracellular receptors, displacing endogenous ligands does not mean functional antagonism is going on. Functional antagonism would require oppositional/lacking activity. Psychedelics however are potent agonists which already makes your model collapse definition wise. Inverse agonists is directly disproven by merely looking at the fact that they are literally agonists…Now there is only your point left regarding downstream signalling differences somehow implying functional antagonism. However this is also nonsense given that functional antagonism implies impaired or reduced receptor signalling/activity, not mere transcriptional/signalling differences, not to mention psychedelic receptor activity is usually more potent and hence the direct opposite of what you’re describing. So no, you’re not correct lmao
English
3
0
0
52
Jimmy Nelson
Jimmy Nelson@obntsdtd·
@1BioScience @aestheticprimal Well I’m correct lol. Functional antagonist because serotonin cannot simultaneously exert its normal function, which is completely different than the transcription and mGlu (etc) effects that psychedelics have.
English
1
0
0
61
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
so confidently wrong it’s almost amusing. I’m not even sure how one possibly arrives at that conclusion, what do you base this on?Psychedelics (LSD,DMT etc.) are not functionally antagonistic. They illicit a different response than serotonin, but this is mostly due to neuronal permeability, affinity etc.
English
1
0
0
72
Jimmy Nelson
Jimmy Nelson@obntsdtd·
@aestheticprimal Good thing psychedelics are 5ht2a inverse agonists and functional antagonists since they have a completely different receptor conformity, illicit a completely different response compared to serotonin and other traditional agonists. You’re wrong, essentially.
English
3
0
8
260
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
nicotine can be absurdly beneficial for cognition and motivation however, most people simply don't use it correctly. Your dose shouldn't exceed 1-2mg if you're seeking sustainable enhancement additionally, preferably opt for patches instead of pouches, vapes etc. since they provide more controlled and sustained release, avoiding the constant ups and downs that furthermore drive addiction and tolerance
English
3
1
28
2.9K
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
some stuff for tonight to read 50+ papers before going to sleep - IN increlex - low dose DMT - ISRIB - 2x White Monster - IN insulin completely annihilates your 15+ compound stack btw
Bio.Science ∴ tweet media
English
6
0
55
2.7K
Ã
Ã@staac_arif·
@1BioScience what about amphetamines?
English
1
0
1
161
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
being sober is against human nature, intoxication is the default human state When looking at how caffeine covers over 50% of all waking hours but also simply at history, where basically at any time point we were either chewing tobacco or abused some other drug embedded into everyday life back then it becomes very clear that sobriety is not the default human state, but mild intoxication/intoxication is This makes the people that always ramble about how drugs are putting you into a state of mind that is not natural and therefore bad, look even more foolish literally, since the beginning of humanity, people have been seeking new ways to get high and become intoxicated, it is deeply rooted in human nature so take your stims and continue the legacy of one of the most prominent traditions of humanity
Bio.Science ∴ tweet media
English
15
17
178
9.1K
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
@staac_arif phenylpiracetam hydrazide, paraxanthine, ritalin but also simpy coffee
English
1
1
4
572
Ã
Ã@staac_arif·
@1BioScience what are good stims for beginners
English
3
0
0
569
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
Some of you may wonder, well, then why are things such as Gothic churches or complex landscapes also beautiful, while other things that look seemingly symmetrical are considered rather plain and boring by us? This is mostly, I think, because beauty is not just perfect symmetry, perfect geometric shapes or optimal compressibility for us to easily encode it I think a good way of putting it is that beauty is what it feels like when structured reality is experienced by you, and basically hits a brain in a way that is - compressible with low energy costs - learnable - safe enough from an evolution engineered perspective - worth acting on for updating and improving your own world model basically, both ambiguity and invariances like you see in beautiful architecture or landscapes, are crucial and highly valuable for enhancing/improving/updating our models So plain, simplistic, and highly geometrical visual are rather plain and boring for us instead of beautiful since they provide coding efficiency but nothing worth for us evolutionary to act on or to spend energy on
Bio.Science ∴ tweet media
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience

have you ever wondered why you even consider thinks beautiful? Albeit us humans love to think of beauty & aesthetics as something divine, something that lies beyond shallow materialism - a lot of it is actually probability densities, integrals, geometry etc... furthermore, how we think of beauty reveals how natural systems themselves are built out of inferential geometry evolutionary coupled to energetic constraint it starts making more sense when you consider the fact that your visual cortex did not evolve to passively admire reality it evolved to minimize variational free energy and encode environmental regularities while importantly, utilizing the least amount of energy to do so you can imagine your brain here basically as a bayesian inference computer that constantly updates its internal model of the world to minimize the "surprise" of sensory input, because fundamentally your brain remains a prediction machine, trying to construct a accurate reality that also accurately predicts any future event - be it the sable tooth tiger using his left or right paw or where the tree leave falls on the ground - you're constantly predicting, correcting erroneous prior predictions and based on that updating your constructed reality Natural environments that follow optimal spatial information structures ( a prominent example being scale invariant f(x) = 1/f stats..) the brain rewards this low friction, high value processing with a valence tag that your consciousness, the "you", interprets as aesthetic pleasure/considers it beautiful. beauty is pretty much rooted in structured complexity that the brain natively craves because it is highly compressible and hence perfect to navigate, analyze and survive in what makes this even more stunning is that when artificial systems are trained solely to represent natural images with maximum efficiency, they spontaneously end up using the same algorithms and field structures utilized by our human visual cortex

English
0
0
8
1.1K
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
Yes, very much so. I think it's mostly because learnable or let's say easily compressible ambiguity and novelty are highly valuable for us humans too, to update and improve our own mental models. Perfect shapes or symmetry are hardly something we would consider beautiful but rather plain and boring. simply because novelty and valuable information are just as crucial as compressibility/encoding efficiency
English
0
0
1
59
ལར་པི།🧩
ལར་པི།🧩@laowaihistorian·
@1BioScience Great post, I also believe there is virtue in imperfection when it comes to how we judge beauty, there is a point where something perfect in geometry is uncanny, essentially lacking imperfection. There is a sort of hard limit how material relevance in beauty.
English
1
0
2
57
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
have you ever wondered why you even consider thinks beautiful? Albeit us humans love to think of beauty & aesthetics as something divine, something that lies beyond shallow materialism - a lot of it is actually probability densities, integrals, geometry etc... furthermore, how we think of beauty reveals how natural systems themselves are built out of inferential geometry evolutionary coupled to energetic constraint it starts making more sense when you consider the fact that your visual cortex did not evolve to passively admire reality it evolved to minimize variational free energy and encode environmental regularities while importantly, utilizing the least amount of energy to do so you can imagine your brain here basically as a bayesian inference computer that constantly updates its internal model of the world to minimize the "surprise" of sensory input, because fundamentally your brain remains a prediction machine, trying to construct a accurate reality that also accurately predicts any future event - be it the sable tooth tiger using his left or right paw or where the tree leave falls on the ground - you're constantly predicting, correcting erroneous prior predictions and based on that updating your constructed reality Natural environments that follow optimal spatial information structures ( a prominent example being scale invariant f(x) = 1/f stats..) the brain rewards this low friction, high value processing with a valence tag that your consciousness, the "you", interprets as aesthetic pleasure/considers it beautiful. beauty is pretty much rooted in structured complexity that the brain natively craves because it is highly compressible and hence perfect to navigate, analyze and survive in what makes this even more stunning is that when artificial systems are trained solely to represent natural images with maximum efficiency, they spontaneously end up using the same algorithms and field structures utilized by our human visual cortex
Bio.Science ∴ tweet media
English
1
0
16
1.7K
Morph
Morph@doctormorphh·
mexidol might just be one of the most overlooked neuroprotective compounds, but also one of the best ones - antioxidant - eliminates hangovers - removes headaches - enhances physical performance - decreased anxiety and depression - decreased lipid peroxidation (PUFA) - anti stress its effects on physical performance are quite unknown, primarily because people write it off as "just another weird chemical" but not looking at it as such and using this to your advantage can be of great use.
Morph tweet mediaMorph tweet media
Morph@doctormorphh

nothing to see here besides just absolutely ANNAHILATING any damage that my brain had to withstand from a viral infection by blasting some pig brain sludge, snorting insulin and ingesting soviet chemicals

English
6
9
190
9.6K
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
Intranasal insulin is widely understood as a compound that boosts plasticity & learning !this is wrong and misses how IN Insulin actually affects the Brain ❖ It is a metaplasticity compound, which means it merely lowers the threshold for plasticity, without directly "boosting" it ➤ pair it with learning, beneficial habits etc.
Bio.Science ∴ tweet media
English
2
0
34
1.8K
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
@C02isG00D first part is simply wrong, inflammation is infinitely more multifaceted. Secondly, the suggestions miss the tweet entirely, it’s not about adding more and especially not about cox absence, it’s about altering downstream substrates precisely without nuking an enzyme
English
0
0
0
56
CO2 Fiend
CO2 Fiend@C02isG00D·
@1BioScience If you have inflammation, you are already abundant in either omega 3s or arachidonic acid. Both turn into pro-resolving mediators in absence of COX (omega 3 into reslovins, protectins etc. arachidonic acid into lipoxins). There is no reason to add more to the mix
English
1
0
17
332
Bio.Science ∴
Bio.Science ∴@1BioScience·
Aspirin with Omega 3 is a potent, highly synergistic combination ◆ combining them significantly enhances effects like ▸ anti-inflammation ▸ tissue repairment & regeneration ▸ cardiovascular & neuroprotection ▸ reduced scarring etc... ◆ But how? While normal NSAIDs simply block COX2, suppresing immune responses ▸ low dose aspirin acetylates it This acetylation basically changes the catalytic behavior of the COX2 enzyme ▸ it now converts EPA and DHA into highly favourable "aspirin triggered" specialitzed pro resolvin mediators that actively promote healing, regeneration, repairment... so instead of globally nuking your natural immune responses, you redirect them towards favourably activity
Bio.Science ∴ tweet mediaBio.Science ∴ tweet media
English
1
4
68
3K