Alice Doussin 🍉

i built Mona, an open source HRT tracker for trans people. • track your hormones • reminders & notifications • medication stock tracking • built-in estradiol simulator 100% free. your data never leaves your device. download and join the community : discord.gg/qsHzkX89vJ

🚨 Stanford just analyzed the privacy policies of the six biggest AI companies in America. Amazon. Anthropic. Google. Meta. Microsoft. OpenAI. All six use your conversations to train their models. By default. Without meaningfully asking. Here's what the paper actually found. The researchers at Stanford HAI examined 28 privacy documents across these six companies not just the main privacy policy, but every linked subpolicy, FAQ, and guidance page accessible from the chat interfaces. They evaluated all of them against the California Consumer Privacy Act, the most comprehensive privacy law in the United States. The results are worse than you think. Every single company collects your chat data and feeds it back into model training by default. Some retain your conversations indefinitely. There is no expiration. No auto-delete. Your data just sits there, forever, feeding future versions of the model. Some of these companies let human employees read your chat transcripts as part of the training process. Not anonymized summaries. Your actual conversations. But here's where it gets genuinely dangerous. For companies like Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon companies that also run search engines, social media platforms, e-commerce sites, and cloud services your AI conversations don't stay inside the chatbot. They get merged with everything else those companies already know about you. Your search history. Your purchase data. Your social media activity. Your uploaded files. The researchers describe a realistic scenario that should make you pause: You ask an AI chatbot for heart-healthy dinner recipes. The model infers you may have a cardiovascular condition. That classification flows through the company's broader ecosystem. You start seeing ads for medications. The information reaches insurance databases. The effects compound over time. You shared a dinner question. The system built a health profile. It gets worse when you look at children's data. Four of the six companies appear to include children's chat data in their model training. Google announced it would train on teenager data with opt-in consent. Anthropic says it doesn't collect children's data but doesn't verify ages. Microsoft says it collects data from users under 18 but claims not to use it for training. Children cannot legally consent to this. Most parents don't know it's happening. The opt-out mechanisms are a maze. Some companies offer opt-outs. Some don't. The ones that do bury the option deep inside settings pages that most users will never find. The privacy policies themselves are written in dense legal language that researchers people whose job is reading these documents found difficult to interpret. And here's the structural problem nobody is addressing. There is no comprehensive federal privacy law in the United States governing how AI companies handle chat data. The patchwork of state laws leaves massive gaps. The researchers specifically call for three things: mandatory federal regulation, affirmative opt-in (not opt-out) for model training, and automatic filtering of personal information from chat inputs before they ever reach a training pipeline. None of those exist today. The uncomfortable truth is this: every time you type something into ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Meta AI, Copilot, or Alexa, you are contributing to a training dataset. Your medical questions. Your relationship problems. Your financial details. Your uploaded documents. You are not the customer. You are the curriculum. And the companies doing this have made it as hard as possible for you to stop.

🎉🥳 C’EST OFFICIEL ! L’avortement devient un droit ACCESSIBLE et GRATUIT dans TOUS les pays de l’UE! Les pays de l’UE pourront puiser dans les fonds européens pour offrir des services d’avortement car c’est une PRESTATION DE SOIN. Gros fuck à la Hongrie, la Pologne, l’Italie et aux fachos d’Europe. Big up à My Voice My Choice qui ont lancé cette initiative citoyenne qui a recueilli 1,2M de signatures ❤️‍🔥

Le fascisme ne mérite que notre intolérance.

🧵 LE CHANGEMENT D’ÉTAT CIVIL C’EST MAINTENANT ! CECDoc est une appli (Windows/macOS/Linux) qui génère automatiquement une requête et un dossier complet pour une demande de changement de sexe et de prénoms à l’état civil 🏳️‍⚧️ Fini la procrastination ! ⤵️ github.com/RdRuntime/CECD…

Don’t even joke lad

if your feminism doesn’t include trans women then you are not actually a feminist

PSA

Et puis la base du problème c'est que vous pensez que demander une photo intime a une meuf qui est fan de toi c'est juste de la lourdeur beauf et pas un comportement de prédateur

Bien le bonjour très chère TL, je vous propose un petit jeu : vous devez deviner quelle case orange la France ne coche pas déjà 🥰

when the french police killed a north african teenager the far-right made a gofundme for the killer and made him a millionaire. only the french maghrebi & black youth burned everything in protest and were met w severe police violence, which white people justified & supported

Imma always retweet these cause I know someone that was in some shit n she got away cause of a video like this she saw on Twitter

"Le patron en roue libre" - un appel à la grève lancé chez Ubisoft après la tempête d'annulation de jeux, de licenciements, la réorganisation du travail et les fermetures de studios buff.ly/4nYwqaD

they showed us an example of a legal, judicial warrant vs an ICE administrative warrant

Repost if Ai artists are not welcomed on your account

wishing all lesbians, dykes, butches, studs, stems, femmes, and queers the best year ever ily

Glad you asked! 1) LLMs are created by scraping all the art and writing off the internet without creator’s compensation or consent, allowing companies to make billions of stolen labor 2) This tech allows companies to then fire the very employees whose work they stole. It’s like taking your blood and using it to power your robot replacement 3) The resulting auto-generated plagiarism slurry can be extremely realistic, allowing companies, governments, scammers etc to create an infinite deluge of propaganda, fake evidence, scams, revenge porn, and addictive meaningless slop flooding our eyes from cradle to grave, a kind of reality-obliterating internet pollution at a scale beyond human comprehension. 4) That’s not even counting the massive electricity drain of the server farms that are gobbling up land and the impending economic crash when the so called “abundance” promised by Silicon Valley vultures never meets their impossible promises. LLMs are to societal trust what toxic runoff is to drinking water. And just like the pollution that comes from Exxon Mobile, this disaster is only possible when the government abdicates its regulatory responsibility because it’s been bought off by the CEOs responsible TLDR: PROS: You can make Judy Hopps make out with Martin Luther King CONS: Mass unemployment, the death of reality, a permanent underclass addicted to a digital meth slot machine

One of the most revealing things about the "using AI for concept art" argument is how disrespectful people - even other concept artists, apparently - already are towards other people's artwork. If it were up to me, of course you would either credit or pay (or both) every artist on your "moodboard"! Why don't you? Artists deserve credit, and they deserve payment. I can only speak for myself, but: A) We certainly don't put anything on a "mood board" here that we didn't buy. We use film stills mostly, and we buy the DVDs of the films we use. This is not expensive. If we used one that we didn't own, I would want someone to point that out so I could rectify that by buying a copy of the film. The last thing I would do is turn around and use that as justification to introduce a new technology that pirates things more efficiently. B) We did want to use another concept artists' portfolio work as inspiration for the background art style in our current project. Want to guess what I did? I contacted the artist and offered them a job doing concept art for the project. They already had a full-time job, but we were nonetheless able to work out a deal where we paid them to do concept art for us on the side. These things aren't hard. It's especially easy to credit people - have you seen the length of the credits in a modern AAA game? It's also easy to send someone some money if you found their work particularly inspirational. To be honest, I'm pretty appalled by this discourse. Respecting artists' work is neither difficult nor expensive. I don't understand why people are so eager to avoid doing it. We should be striving for better treatment of artists than they currently receive, not worse.

On est combien à détester le Rassemblement National dans ce pays ? Retweetez un peu, pour voir. 😊

@Krystine_art Both look very cool, but I think I'd like the top one better! ❤️

✨️Expedition 33 art giveaway✨️ 🎁 2 Printed artworks, 2 winners 🎁 To enter: ▪️Retweet this post ▪️Tell me which one you'd like! ▪️Make sure you follow my work🖤 Ends 21 November - Open Worldwide.