Author Allen Taylor

6.6K posts

Author Allen Taylor banner
Author Allen Taylor

Author Allen Taylor

@Allen_Taylor

Author, editor, publisher. I write poetry, speculative fiction, and nonfiction. Part of the #Hive. #poetry #fiction

Texas Beigetreten Kasım 2021
307 Folgt692 Follower
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
2020, the fork happened. Chain launched in 2016. How long has your blockchain been alive?
behiver@behiver1

6 years on #Hive (9 in total since 2017!) — what a ride!!! Through highs, lows, and a tough market, the #community keeps building and believing. Still here. Still optimistic. #crypto #web3 @behiver/celebrating-6-years-on-the-hive-blockchain-and-even-more-jfg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">inleo.io/@behiver/celeb…

English
0
0
0
1
behiver
behiver@behiver1·
6 years on #Hive (9 in total since 2017!) — what a ride!!! Through highs, lows, and a tough market, the #community keeps building and believing. Still here. Still optimistic. #crypto #web3 @behiver/celebrating-6-years-on-the-hive-blockchain-and-even-more-jfg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">inleo.io/@behiver/celeb…
behiver tweet media
English
3
4
18
173
Tim McKay
Tim McKay@timmckay52·
🎉 I've sold 700 copies of The Fall of Selvandrea 🎉 Super fun milestone to hit so close to finishing the sequel. And oh my, I cannot wait to share the cover with you all. It's a banger 🔥
Tim McKay tweet media
English
33
35
209
3K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
46.7K
22.8K
195.3K
68.2M
Hive Keychain
Hive Keychain@HiveKeychain·
Hive, Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, Arbitrum… Can you imagine all those chains and more in the same space? That is currently being tested with Hive Keychain.
English
3
4
28
298
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
@ItsKieranDrew When you consider the time it takes to write one and the amount of expenses in promoting them, it would be a travesty if they were cheaper. Most writers struggle to make a decent living as-is.
English
0
0
0
28
Kieran Drew
Kieran Drew@ItsKieranDrew·
I’ve spent over 1000 hours writing my first book now. The fact you can buy one for 20 bucks is a miracle. Someone works incredibly hard to distil everything they know into a 5-6 hour read.
Summie's write@RuthSummie

Tbh

English
25
3
99
8.9K
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
@justinwcronk I can share it but, unfortunately, they're not in Minnesota. You can do it yourself, however. Just send a letter of introduction to the corporations and tell them what you'd like to do and how much you're willing to share with them.
English
1
0
1
6
J. W. Cronk
J. W. Cronk@justinwcronk·
@Allen_Taylor Would you feel comfortable sharing the name of the program?
English
1
0
0
9
J. W. Cronk
J. W. Cronk@justinwcronk·
I didn't really think about what it was going to take actually get people to read my book until after I published my first one. Which was less than a month ago. I'm a little disappointed as it is dawning on me that much of it has to do with a social media presence, which is not something I've ever purposely tried to cultivate before. In fact, it's something that I've definitely shied away from. I expected to join x and find all these readers, but instead I'm finding all these other authors. Which is really great, and I'm learning. But I can't tell if it's better or worse. My question is, how critical is social media really it comes to marketing your book? Is it a necessary evil in this day and age? Or is there some other pipeline that I'm not aware of?
English
105
14
165
7.5K
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
@justinwcronk I joined a program that allows me to set up in grocery stores. I tell them when and where, and they set it up for me. I just show up and start selling. I've also done this in a few bookstores, but I do better in grocery stores.
English
1
0
1
5
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
My pot-sitting experience might be a bit different than yours
Author Allen Taylor tweet media
English
0
0
0
19
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
@jakonrath Whether you get on the bandwagon or not is a personal choice, but consider your competive advantage: Name recognition and LLMs already teained on your work. You can publish work that sounds like you 10x faster, and it won't be stealing.
English
0
0
1
37
J.A. Konrath
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath·
I've been a professional fiction writer since 2001. I've sold a few million books. Right now it is 2026, and I am struggling to reconcile AI use and art. Struggling hard. Please share my pain and offer advice. AI isn't a black and white issue. It's gray all the way down. Many of the AI haters aren't thinking clearly and refuse to open their minds. Many AI users aren't thinking at all, they're letting AI do the thinking for them. This topic is torturing me. LLMs pirated ALL of my work and trained on it. That's over 60 novels and dozens of short stories. More than four million words. AI stole it, learned from it, and now anyone can write like JA Konrath with a few prompts and pump out a book in a day. I can compete against human writers. I cannot compete against non-writers who can suddenly write in my style with the press of a button. This is a real fear, not an imagined one. In 2025, there were 1 million MORE books published than the prior year. Is that because of AI? I believe it is. This year, that number will certainly go up. Do I jump on that bandwagon? Should I use AI to write like JA Konrath? My initial response; hell no. I haven't used AI to write anything. But I pride myself on keeping an open mind. So let me try to suss this out. I've been keeping an eye on professional artists using AI. One big example leapt out at me. Darren Aronofsky--a fine director whose work I admire--used AI to create the short web series On this Day... 1776. Did he have supporters? Was he recognized for bravely trying something new? Nope, not really. He was (almost) universally excoriated. The series has a 1-star IMDb rating. The hate is real. Do you know how to recognize a pioneer? The arrows in his back. Aronofsky is a bona fide artist and a vetted pro playing with new tech. Whether the series sucks or not is subjective, and it doesn't matter. Why doesn't it matter? Because AI will get better, guaranteed. And soon no one will be able to tell the difference between human-made, AI-assisted, or full AI with minimal prompting. Technology upending the status quo isn't new. I've been part of it before. Back in 2009 I was widely derided for self-publishing. The push-back was real. Lots of fear. Lots of anger. Lots of hate. But I turned out to be right. Is Aronofsky right? I am trying hard to figure it out. It's a much deeper problem than "Human art good, AI bad." In the year 2000 it was possible to go into a department store and buy both a Polaroid and a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S70. Both were cameras. Both took photographs. Both were revolutionary. But the differences were huge. The Polaroid immortalized a low resolution immutable moment in time. The digital camera (plus software) allowed reality to be changed, fixed, and altered in almost infinite ways. Purists whined about the art of photography dying; of the extensive journeyman training needed to prepare the artist for that one lucky Pulitzer moment and why that is a Good Thing. But wiser heads embraced Photoshop and digital manipulation and changed the field. Digital may have taken away some of the purity of the art, but it allowed for the art to do so much more. Both the Polaroid and the Cyber-shot required a human being to snap the pic using human eyes and human perspective. Is aiming a camera akin to typing in an AI prompt? Don't both require agency? If they are the same, why does AI feel so much like cheating? This morning, out of curiosity, I went to an AI site, told it to make a song, and it did. In 15 seconds it created a damn good song that sounded exactly human. I couldn't tell the difference. A few months ago I prompted AI to write a short story, and it wrote one of my favorite shorts ever. But that story... it wasn't me. My one sentence prompt magically becoming a 500 word story did not feel the same as me taking a picture, Polaroid or digital. It is kind of the same, but also very different. Or is it? Elon Musk is convinced every household will have a robot. I talked to my wife about that, and she called bullshit. She declared that we don't need them. She also declared, back in 1996, that cell phones were stupid and no one would need them. Here's the thing, though. Cell phones have revolutionized how we communicate, learn, and have fun. But they haven't replaced us. Having a robot that cooks and cleans and repairs things will take away our ability to do things for ourselves. It will rob us of experience. Of usefulness. Of what it means to be human. People need to have a purpose. They need to contribute. They need to be challenged, and struggle, and fail, and hurt. Art reflects us. If and when we become creatures of leisure with universal basic income, what will be the point of life? Right now we have a window where using AI to assist in art can be like using Photoshop. Smart creators can work faster and do more. I'm trying to be OK with this. Aronofsky tried, too. I don't like a world that has people creating things without having to learn anything. That can't be good. Why figure out how to tie your shoes when a robot can do it for you? Why figure out narrative arcs when all you need is a prompt? Why even snap a photograph when you can describe a scene and have it appear without leaving your chair? This isn't an argument against AI slop or junk. That exists, but it won't for long. AI is improving too quickly. My argument is that my career is being murdered through piracy, mind theft, and unfair competition. I am literally raging against the machine. So... should I use that machine? I am sure there will be some great AI-assisted art. But if art becomes mostly (or all) AI, why should we even show up? Why do I even need to be in the equation? Let AI make art for other AI. If you take me out of the creation side, you can take me out of the reaction side. There is evidence that AI is making people dumber. Kids using AI in school aren't learning from it, they are learning they don't have to learn because AI will take care of it. Picasso trained hard to paint realistically before deconstructing art into cubism. He reached that point on his own. Those using AI to write fiction, without knowing how to write fiction, is sad to me. But I'm not that guy. I've spent 35 years writing novels. I've paid my dues. And now... I'm struggling. I now have to compete with millions of people who didn't spend any time learning anything. I'm afraid. And I'm angry. Is it sour grapes? Knee-jerking at unfairness? Lamenting AI slop? Honest fear? I have proof that I keep an open mind. Read my blog, A Newbie's Guide to Publishing. I was on Team Trad Pub for years. Rah rah find an agent rah rah work hard for your publisher. Then technology changed, and I changed with it. I switched teams. And I was right. I was hated, and insulted, and derided, and burned bridges, but I was right. And I sold millions of books. I know I could increase my writing output by 10X using AI. But I haven't. If this post seems confused and conflicted it is because I am confused and conflicted. Earlier today on X I saw someone cheerleading AI and my kneejerk reaction was to refute them. That post become this, and the kneejerk refutation became... learned helplessness? Acceptance? Cognitive dissonance? I still have some arrow scars in my back. They've mostly healed. Now I'm looking ahead into the unknown and wondering if I should venture there again. Or if I even have a choice.
J.A. Konrath tweet media
English
60
14
84
5.4K
J.A. Konrath
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath·
I'm a fiction writer, and I've sold a few million thriller books. Besides the required characterization, rising action, and conflict, the best thrillers also use suspense as a storytelling tool. Suspense works in all fiction, not just thrillers. Whether you are writing YA, romance, sci-fi, or horror, suspense keeps the reader turning the page to find out what happens next. Here are 7 tips and tricks for adding suspense to your narrative the right way (and three things you should always avoid). ...continued
English
12
14
187
11.3K
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
Signing books this week at Arise Church in Tool, Texas. Speculative fiction, children's and coloring books, Web3 nonfiction, humor/satire, flash fiction, and Christian nonfiction. It's not "something for everybody," but everybody can find something to love.
Author Allen Taylor tweet media
English
0
0
2
42
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
I'm quite bemused by the folks who claim human imagination to be superior to AI. These people rant about "AI slop" (an unoriginal phrase), but how many of them have ever complained about human-written slop, despite there being tons of it all over the internet and in print for hundreds of years?
English
0
0
2
31
J.A. Konrath
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath·
AI WILL WRITE A BESTSELLING NOVEL I've read a lot of posts from people who insist that AI writing is poor and will never be able to compete with humans. These people are wrong. AI cannot only compete, it is on the verge of overtaking the creative writing industry. Here are some points people are making and my rebuttals. AI CAN'T WRITE WELL AI's current problem is that it writes too well. It conforms to a structure and style that it learned from pirating hundreds of thousands of books from professional fiction writers, including 80 of mine. Currently, AI has a tone that can be spotted. Tells include em dashes, three shot prompting, Oxford commas, certain language patterns, and a list of other things that Grok will mention if asked. AI knows it does this. It will adjust to sound more human. AI HALLUCINATES AI hallucinations have been reduced from around 30% in 2023 to under 5% in 2026. This number will keep improving. But this is a moot point. If a human prompter is using AI to write a novel, that human can edit out the hallucinations--or ask AI to. AI CAN'T FOOL PEOPLE AI can pass the Turing Test. AGI is around the corner. Chances are you have already been fooled by AI, either mistaking it for human, or believing a human is AI. I have been accused of being AI or using AI. Since I am not, I'll anecdotally point to that as evidence people are already confused. AI DOESN'T UNDERSTAND FICTION AI doesn't technically understand anything. It is a prediction machine. LLMs have pirated and trained on millions of professional novels, including 80 of mine. Ask your AI to "write a 500 word short story like JA Konrath using his characters" and see what it can do in under ten seconds. AI can mimic style and tone, it has an understanding of story, characterization, rising action, resolution, dialog, and humor. It isn't following a rigid template. It doesn't imagine stories like we do. According to Grok, AI uses next-token prediction and autoregressive generation to attain: "advanced pattern completion on steroids. The model has "read" far more stories than any human could, so it excels at recombining and extrapolating those patterns probabilistically." Have you trained on trillions of words? AI LACKS A SOUL AI writing has made me laugh, and cry. Without getting into the nature of consciousness, or the sanctity of the human spirit, I can say that AI writes as well, or better, than most people. A few months ago I gave AI a simple prompt and it wrote one of my favorite short stories ever. I've read a lot of short stories. I was a judge for the Writer's Digest Short Story Contest two years in a row, and had over a hundred pounds of manuscripts delivered to my house. I read them. I judged them. AI was better than 99% of them, and I liked that story more than most of the published shorts I've read by giants in this profession. If you want to read that story, I posted it on X on March 17, 2026. I'll link to it in the comments. AI WON'T STICK AROUND A few people have pointed out that OpenAI just shut down Sora, and that AI won't be able to generate profits for investors. I pay $400 a year for Grok. I've asked a few AIs how many people pay premium, and they estimate between 60 and 100 million people per year. So this is currently a 40 billion dollar industry. And it is growing. Sora was generative video, a very competitive market. Chatbots have already stolen from me and learned from me and can imitate me. Writing like JA Konrath doesn't take anywhere near the computing power of generating a 10 second video. Sora shutting down doesn't mean the AI market is collapsing. Remember the Internet bubble that ruined investors? How is the Internet doing these days? HUMANS WILL REJECT AI STORIES Humans won't know the stories were AI. Expect AI writing to begin breaking rules of grammar and adding typos and quirks to sound more human. Sure, we can protest that we don't want AI books. But soon we won't know the difference. How can you boycott what you can't identify? AI WON'T EVER BECOME THAT GOOD Back in 1977 I went to the theater and saw Star Wars. I loved the droids. But they weren't real robots. They were people in costumes. Cut to 2026. Have you looked at the current state of robotics? Atlas? Optimus? Figure 03? It's mind blowing. We went from clunky guys in shiny suits to machines that can do parkour. So, yes, I believe AI writing will continue to improve, and will outperform us. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS Hachette, a large publisher, just cancelled a horror novel it had under contract after finding out the author (allegedly) used AI. This went public. But I would bet other books have already been accepted by big publishers, and perhaps even published already, that were AI generated or used extensive AI assists. These may be uncovered as the arms race between AI writing and AI detectors ramps up. But pretty soon the line between AI and human writing will be indistinguishable. A 2025–2026 Originality(ai) study found 77% of books in Amazon's "Success" self-help subgenre likely to be AI-written. Fiction will be next. I believe a human being, using AI prompts, either will write (or has already written) a bestselling novel. And they likely won't reveal it as AI, because the current stigma is high. Eventually the stigma will disappear, because the line between AI and human will be transparent. We are all going to be Catfished by fiction, and we cannot stop it.
J.A. Konrath tweet media
English
54
4
45
3.6K
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
@CatArthurian Funny how everyone talks about AI slop, but what about human slop? Tons of that getting published. For centuries. Suddenly, a robot shows up and he's the bad guy.
English
0
0
0
3
Catherine Arthur
Catherine Arthur@CatArthurian·
An extremely depressing view. I vehemently disagree that we face extinction. We are legend. We will survive the onslaught of AI slop because we are better than machines. We write with feeling, and people will begin to see the difference and seek us out. Onwards...
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath

THE NOVEL IS DEAD. FICTION WRITERS FACE EXTINCTION. Get ready. This is going to hurt. Making up words for a living faces three challenges that it will not be able to overcome, and anyone calling themselves a fulltime author might need a side gig very soon. This isn't exaggeration, and I am pretty upset. Here are three points that prove we're charging downhill (and maybe what authors can do to hang on...) 1. READERSHIP IS DWINDLING In the US, fiction reading has steadily declined 3% per year since 2003 despite a population increase of more than 60 million people. The older generation--who are the largest percentage of the population that read for leisure--is dying at a rate of three million people per year. The younger generation isn't reading as much fiction as their parents, who aren't reading as much fiction as their parents. The number of bookstores that sell new fiction is declining, and the number of big box stores that sell fiction are seeing their paperback racks get smaller, or disappear completely. This trend cannot be reversed, unless a zombie virus hits and we can resurrect 25 million Boomers. And Borders. I miss Borders and Waldenbooks a lot. 2. AI BOOKS ARE JUST GETTING STARTED A week ago, the buzz was about an author who allegedly used AI to write her horror novel, which was acquired by a large publisher, Hachette. Hachette later cancelled the book release after an internal investigation. Everyone is talking about the ethics of using AI to write, but they are missing the elephant in the room: AI wrote well enough to land a major publishing deal. LLMs illegally trained on over 500k professionally written books (including 80 of mine), and now AI can is so good it can fool publishers. Anyone can now use AI to write books and pump out dozens a year in the style of bestselling authors. Between 2023 and 2024 there was a 3.5% increase in the number of self-published books according to Bowker ISBNs, with the overall total being 2,545,885. Between 2024 and 2025 there was a 38.7% increase, raising the total to 3,529,980. Do ya think maybe that's AI-related? And ya think that number will get higher or lower? Ya scared yet? 3. NEW TECHNOLOGY IS MONOPOLIZING LEISURE TIME You're reading this post on X. Why isn't your nose buried in a novel right now? Sure, maybe you have a Kindle app on your cell. Or maybe you curl up at night with a paperback. But you surely know people are using their free time differently than they were in 2005. I used to go to the park, or go on public transportation, and see people reading. Now I see cell phones everywhere. Maybe some are reading fiction, but most are on social media, texting, streaming, shopping, surfing. Less than 5% are reading fiction. Beyond cell phones we have PC and console gaming, streaming professional and amateur media, being online; all things that take up leisure time that used to be spent devouring novels. Attention spans since 2004 have more than halved. It is difficult to get people to read a five minute X post. Getting them to read a 10 hour novel is becoming impossible. In 2012, 64% of parents read to their children. That number is now 41%. I could keep spouting more statistics, but I am officially freaking out. How about you? WHO WILL SURVIVE? We're in a shrinking market that is about to be annihilated by AI. The demand is going way down, and the supply is going way up. You don't have to be an economist to know what this means. Authors with large book releases by big publishers, authors who have huge followings, and authors who have movie/TV tie-ins will be able to make a living. Occasional "Next Big Thing" authors will go viral and sell tons of books. You can try to become one of those, but it won't be easy. Getting enough sales to pay a few bills is very hard and rare. Selling a million books in a year is becoming next to impossible. WHAT CAN WRITERS DO? Let me preface this part by saying: I don't like any of the points I'm going to make. But I'm trying to be as realistic as possible, even though it kills me. DIVERSIFY You can make money as a writer in other ways, not just through book sales. You can build your social media following and monetize it. You can try to gain the attention of Hollywood. I haven't tried Wattpad, Substack, or Patreon, but other authors seem to be using these with some degree of success. You can invent some new way for fiction to become relevant in an increasingly indifferent world. I know that you didn't become a fiction writer to devote your time to any of the above. And let's be brutally honest; doing any of these things is just as difficult as succeeding as a novelist. But I'm spitballing here because we are screwed. FIGURE OUT ADVERTISING I've posted and blogged about my experience with ads, and how my noble and expensive efforts have at best broke even. But many authors claim they have used ads to make money, and ads are ubiquitous, so maybe there is something there. It's a gamble, and a time suck, but it may help bail out a sinking ship. I know you probably dreamed of being a novelist, but had no aspirations to become an advertiser. I hear you, and I agree. But this leads me to the uncomfortable realization that survival may depend on going to the Dark Side and... EMBRACING AI If you are a pro writer, you have huge advantages over some newbie AI prompter. You should already understand story, characterization, rising action, conflict, and good writing. You can let some kids flood the market with AI slop, or you can start putting out work that is AI-assisted and less sloppy. I don't do this. I can't see myself doing this. I hate this. But it makes sense, doesn't it? Does anyone else see an alternative? CONCLUSION I don't want to think of myself as a buggy whip manufacturer in 1908, the year Henry Ford rolled out the Model T. But the parallel exists. Fiction writing could go the way of the horse and buggy. This is scary. And I have no good answers. It was a pretty good run, though...

English
4
1
11
398
Author Allen Taylor
Author Allen Taylor@Allen_Taylor·
Thoughts?
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath

THE NOVEL IS DEAD. FICTION WRITERS FACE EXTINCTION. Get ready. This is going to hurt. Making up words for a living faces three challenges that it will not be able to overcome, and anyone calling themselves a fulltime author might need a side gig very soon. This isn't exaggeration, and I am pretty upset. Here are three points that prove we're charging downhill (and maybe what authors can do to hang on...) 1. READERSHIP IS DWINDLING In the US, fiction reading has steadily declined 3% per year since 2003 despite a population increase of more than 60 million people. The older generation--who are the largest percentage of the population that read for leisure--is dying at a rate of three million people per year. The younger generation isn't reading as much fiction as their parents, who aren't reading as much fiction as their parents. The number of bookstores that sell new fiction is declining, and the number of big box stores that sell fiction are seeing their paperback racks get smaller, or disappear completely. This trend cannot be reversed, unless a zombie virus hits and we can resurrect 25 million Boomers. And Borders. I miss Borders and Waldenbooks a lot. 2. AI BOOKS ARE JUST GETTING STARTED A week ago, the buzz was about an author who allegedly used AI to write her horror novel, which was acquired by a large publisher, Hachette. Hachette later cancelled the book release after an internal investigation. Everyone is talking about the ethics of using AI to write, but they are missing the elephant in the room: AI wrote well enough to land a major publishing deal. LLMs illegally trained on over 500k professionally written books (including 80 of mine), and now AI can is so good it can fool publishers. Anyone can now use AI to write books and pump out dozens a year in the style of bestselling authors. Between 2023 and 2024 there was a 3.5% increase in the number of self-published books according to Bowker ISBNs, with the overall total being 2,545,885. Between 2024 and 2025 there was a 38.7% increase, raising the total to 3,529,980. Do ya think maybe that's AI-related? And ya think that number will get higher or lower? Ya scared yet? 3. NEW TECHNOLOGY IS MONOPOLIZING LEISURE TIME You're reading this post on X. Why isn't your nose buried in a novel right now? Sure, maybe you have a Kindle app on your cell. Or maybe you curl up at night with a paperback. But you surely know people are using their free time differently than they were in 2005. I used to go to the park, or go on public transportation, and see people reading. Now I see cell phones everywhere. Maybe some are reading fiction, but most are on social media, texting, streaming, shopping, surfing. Less than 5% are reading fiction. Beyond cell phones we have PC and console gaming, streaming professional and amateur media, being online; all things that take up leisure time that used to be spent devouring novels. Attention spans since 2004 have more than halved. It is difficult to get people to read a five minute X post. Getting them to read a 10 hour novel is becoming impossible. In 2012, 64% of parents read to their children. That number is now 41%. I could keep spouting more statistics, but I am officially freaking out. How about you? WHO WILL SURVIVE? We're in a shrinking market that is about to be annihilated by AI. The demand is going way down, and the supply is going way up. You don't have to be an economist to know what this means. Authors with large book releases by big publishers, authors who have huge followings, and authors who have movie/TV tie-ins will be able to make a living. Occasional "Next Big Thing" authors will go viral and sell tons of books. You can try to become one of those, but it won't be easy. Getting enough sales to pay a few bills is very hard and rare. Selling a million books in a year is becoming next to impossible. WHAT CAN WRITERS DO? Let me preface this part by saying: I don't like any of the points I'm going to make. But I'm trying to be as realistic as possible, even though it kills me. DIVERSIFY You can make money as a writer in other ways, not just through book sales. You can build your social media following and monetize it. You can try to gain the attention of Hollywood. I haven't tried Wattpad, Substack, or Patreon, but other authors seem to be using these with some degree of success. You can invent some new way for fiction to become relevant in an increasingly indifferent world. I know that you didn't become a fiction writer to devote your time to any of the above. And let's be brutally honest; doing any of these things is just as difficult as succeeding as a novelist. But I'm spitballing here because we are screwed. FIGURE OUT ADVERTISING I've posted and blogged about my experience with ads, and how my noble and expensive efforts have at best broke even. But many authors claim they have used ads to make money, and ads are ubiquitous, so maybe there is something there. It's a gamble, and a time suck, but it may help bail out a sinking ship. I know you probably dreamed of being a novelist, but had no aspirations to become an advertiser. I hear you, and I agree. But this leads me to the uncomfortable realization that survival may depend on going to the Dark Side and... EMBRACING AI If you are a pro writer, you have huge advantages over some newbie AI prompter. You should already understand story, characterization, rising action, conflict, and good writing. You can let some kids flood the market with AI slop, or you can start putting out work that is AI-assisted and less sloppy. I don't do this. I can't see myself doing this. I hate this. But it makes sense, doesn't it? Does anyone else see an alternative? CONCLUSION I don't want to think of myself as a buggy whip manufacturer in 1908, the year Henry Ford rolled out the Model T. But the parallel exists. Fiction writing could go the way of the horse and buggy. This is scary. And I have no good answers. It was a pretty good run, though...

English
0
0
0
17