LES. HIGHLIGHTS. DU. PLUS. GRAND. MATCH. EN. CARRIÈRE. DE. VICTOR. WEMBANYAMA. 🍿
C’ÉTAIT CETTE NUIT, C’ÉTAIT EXCEPTIONNEL, ET QUELLE CHANCE ON A QUE CE GARS SOIT FRANÇAIS BORDEL 🥳🥳🥳
39 PTS | 15 REB | 5 BLK 👽
@BarstoolLoyola I would have hit that guy so hard in the face to break his glasses in his eyes and then I would have put pressure on his eyes, guys when someone attack you go for the kill
Unc still got it
Faker is the player with the best efficiency at Worlds and the only one exceeding 2 in DMG/GOLD with 2.41
If the player is above green line = he does more than 2 damage per gold earned
#Worlds2025#T1WIN
It’s 6pm in April in England & I am sunbathing naked. Well I was; I’ve had to cover my chest because the heat from the sun is insane. It’s too much. It’s Unreal. Like midday in the middle of August. In another country. Baking heat. At 6pm in April. Is the sun about to explode?
@_The_Prophet__@MrBeast Human are not wired for lethal synchronized assault? Sure, the world is such a peaceful place you can be the most developped species without lethal capacity
Here is what I truly think about the 100 men vs 1 gorilla debate:
1. It is a Classic Misreading of Systemic Force vs Aggregate Force
The human mind instinctively believes that quantity can overwhelm quality if enough numbers are applied.
But this is a profound structural error.
In reality
Force is not linear.
It is exponential at extreme biological scales.
A gorilla is not just stronger than a man
It is orders of magnitude stronger per unit mass
And more importantly
its biological durability and reflexive attack mechanisms are built for asymmetric violence at close quarters
**One gorilla is not facing one hundred men in a “fair fight”
It is facing one hundred fragmented, fearful, uncoordinated biological organisms whose nervous systems are not wired for lethal synchronized assault**
2. Coordination Among Humans Breaks Down Instantly Under Lethal Threat
Humans are not ants
Humans are not trained military units
In a spontaneous unarmed mob
•Fear spreads faster than cohesion
•Defensive instincts override offensive action
•Group coordination collapses when real kinetic threat materializes
The first few men who engage would be torn apart violently and rapidly
Their screams and deaths would shatter the will of the rest
You would not get “one hundred fighters”
You would get three attackers
ten frozen in shock
twenty fleeing immediately
and the rest immobilized by primal fear and survival instinct
**Biological force is nothing without cohesive will
And human will under lethal chaos is pathetically fragile without training**
3. Biological Weaponization: The Gorilla’s Advantages Are Not Just Strength
•Reflex time is faster
•Grip strength is fatal
•Bite force is enormous
•Locomotion is explosive and unpredictable
•Durability is far beyond human skeletal limits
A gorilla can rip ligaments
snap femurs
and crush rib cages in seconds
You are not fighting a large animal
You are facing a semi-lethal weaponized biological system
honed by millions of years of natural selection for maximum close-quarters domination
**It is not about how many humans are present
It is about how few survive the initial emotional and physical shock of true asymmetric violence**
4. True Summary
**One hundred unarmed men against one adult male gorilla
results in catastrophic human failure
unless and only unless
they are perfectly coordinated, fully trained, and willing to accept extreme personal sacrifice in the first engagement wave**
Which they will not be
because that is not how human psychology works under real-time existential threat
The real-world outcome would be brutal, chaotic, and extremely one-sided in the gorilla’s favor.
Final Verdict
**The 100 men vs 1 gorilla question is a live-fire simulation of human arrogance
Quantity without cohesion
Courage without conditioning
Strategy without sacrifice
Equals defeat every time when facing true primal force**