Towards better

@AhmetBeyefendi Batıyı yönlendiren üst bir ekip var bunlar medya teknoloji ve finans olarak güçlü herşey onların plan ve çıkarlarına göre dizayn edilmeye çalışılyor ve bu sırada türkiyenin demokrasisi ,doğası yaşanabilirliği kimsenin umrunda değil.

💭 Avrupa Komisyonu Ursula von Der Leyen’in kırdığı potu yüzeysel argümanlarla toparlamaya çalışmış. Ursula pot kırdı da denemez aslında; kadının söylediği ABye onlarca yıldır hakim olan düşüncedir. 65 senedir kapıda bekletilen Türkiye’nin AB adayı olduğu da açık yalandır; Türklere vize randevusu bile çok sınırlı veriliyor. Artık bu yalanları aklıbaşında kimse ciddiye almamalı. Türkiye AB için ticaret yaptığı bir ülkedir, asıl önemi mülteci tutma merkezi olmasıdır. NATO ortaklığı da göstermeliktir; Türkiye saldırıya uğrasa hiçbir AB ülkesi askerini 5. Madde kapsamında Türkiye’ye yollamaz. Türkiye’deki laik Cumhuriyet’in büyük ölçüde yıkılması sürecinde de Avrupa devletlerinin, istihbarat ve kurumlarının büyük katkısı olmuştur. AByi suçlamıyorum, sadece ne olduklarını açık ifade ediyorum.

@Cool_Ustaz A person who uses their mind would say: Where there are delicate balances, symmetry, measurements and proportions, there is design, not coincidence; there is a creator equipped with science and engineering.

Allah created whale milk with nearly 50% fat, so dense it does not mix with water, ensuring the calf is nourished even in the open sea. Indeed, Allah is Most Wise in His creation. فَتَبَارَكَ ٱللَّٰهُ أَحْسَنُ ٱلْخَٰلِقِينَ

@Cool_Ustaz Believing in evolution is not scientific. It is believing that everything was created as a result of unconscious, random mutations; but we know that 98% of these mutations are harmful.

@Cool_Ustaz The probability of such a small number of beneficial mutations accumulating sequentially under the pressure of constantly harmful mutations to form an enormously complex organism like a dinosaur or a human seems astronomically low.

@Cool_Ustaz cardiovascular system, etc.) in the long term is extremely unlikely. 3. The burden of natural selection Natural selection can only select beneficial mutations. But beneficial ones are very few and usually have little effect.

@Cool_Ustaz Very few act like "constructive workers," providing benefits. In this case, in an environment where destructive mutations are constantly dominant, the emergence of a complex, integrated, and functional structure (eyes, wings, brain,

@Cool_Ustaz 2. The predominance of destructive mutations Your construction analogy hits right here: Most mutations act like "destructive workers" (degrading proteins, disrupting metabolism, impairing organ function).

@Cool_Ustaz 1. In scientific literature, 98-99.9% of mutations are considered harmful or neutral. Beneficial mutations are very rare (at rates of one in a thousand, one in ten thousand, etc.).

@Cool_Ustaz If 27 out of 30 workers are destructive and only 3 are constructive, is it possible for a beautiful building to emerge from that construction?

@Cool_Ustaz 98-99% of mutations are harmful or neutral, only 1-2% are beneficial. Did such a complex and integrated structure, from a single cell to a dinosaur (or human), arise from the natural selection of such a small number of beneficial mutations?

@Cool_Ustaz because it's not a conscious being. Therefore, the claim of "step-by-step accumulation" is truly problematic here.

@Cool_Ustaz creates a risk of infection, or can lead to blood leakage → it's a disadvantage. Natural selection doesn't preserve this half-structure; it most likely eliminates it. It's impossible for the organism to predict or plan for "a full system in the future,"

@Cool_Ustaz Natural selection works based on current benefit, not future potential benefit. A "half-vessel" (just a small segment of a vessel without a complete circulatory system) doesn't provide the organism with a clear advantage right now. On the contrary, it consumes energy,

@Cool_Ustaz 'I want to have blood circulation; I'll need this later.'" This sentence perfectly summarizes a problem that contradicts the very basic principle of evolutionary theory (natural selection).

@Cool_Ustaz “Even if an organism creates a small blood vessel through mutations, it's useless waste without a complete system. Natural selection doesn't preserve it; it destroys it. Because the organism doesn't have consciousness to say,

@Cool_Ustaz the organism will die quickly. The expression "millions of years" is used to obscure this fact.

@Cool_Ustaz 1. A half-system doesn't work. Living things have extremely complex structures; these are interconnected and interdependent, and cannot be formed by accumulation alone. If blood, vessels, heart, lungs, and the iron needed to carry oxygen don't all form simultaneously,

@Cool_Ustaz Living things consist of interconnected, integrated systems; one cannot function without the others. Therefore, cumulative progress (evolution) cannot occur because a half-system cannot function a living thing cannot survive with a half-system.

@Cool_Ustaz Evolution is the greatest deception in the world. The idea that organisms spontaneously arose and changed is closer to a fairy tale like "Alice in Wonderland" than to a scientific narrative.

@AhmetBeyefendi aslında devletin ne kadar güçlü olduğunu işçiler hakkını araken öğreniyoruz ne kadar acı ,oysa ki her taraf azılı suçlularla dolu

💭Dünyanın en tehlikeli işlerinden birini yapanlar "Açım ben" diye haykırıyorlar. Bu rezillik sizin ve sizi iktidarda tutanların eseri, AKP/MHP!