AuditHub

We've offering free security audits at @EthCC The Security Snapshot You submit your repo before March 22 We run it through the AuditHub suite You pick up your report at our booth 100 % Free. No setup required (most teams only see this kind of analysis during a paid audit)🧵

Our partner Veridise is at EthCC Cannes March 30-31. If you're a founder who hasn't mapped your security risks before mainnet, the Founder Risk Briefing is worth your time. DM @VeridiseInc to reserve a spot.

Follow @VeridiseInc to win TWO full-access passes for @EthCC

We're giving away 2 full-access passes to @EthCC in Cannes 30 March - 2 April To enter: 1⃣Follow @VeridiseInc 2⃣Repost this post Winner drawn on 28 March Our partner @AuditHubDev will be at the booth running a security quiz Stop by, test your knowledge, take home merch

This is 100% free, no strings attached DM to reserve. If you are heading to @EthCC and you build on-chain, these 15 minutes are worth your time. @AuditHubDev to book a slot !

Why does this matter? Because most teams only see this kind of analysis during a paid audit, weeks after they needed it. This gives you a real signal, fast, at no cost.

We've offering free security audits at @EthCC The Security Snapshot You submit your repo before March 22 We run it through the AuditHub suite You pick up your report at our booth 100 % Free. No setup required (most teams only see this kind of analysis during a paid audit)🧵

You're building. You're shipping. You don't know what your code looks like from the outside. Submit your repo before March 22. We run it through the full AuditHub tool suite. You pick up your security report at our booth at @EthCC in Cannes. Free. Your real code. A real report. Spots are limited. DM us to register. audithub.dev/blog/audithub-…

Think you ship secure code? Prove it at @EthCC. We're running a 90-second blockchain security quiz at our booth. 6 questions. One score. No hiding behind "we follow best practices." EthCC 3rd Floor. March 30 and 31. DM @AuditHubDev to book time with the team

Two ways to use formal verification tools: plug-and-play mode catches common vulnerabilities while your protocol is still evolving. Once architecture solidifies, customize checks for protocol-specific invariants. Both run continuously as you develop.

OrCa generates millions of random test cases guided by your specifications. It uses specs to direct its search and check for violations. When it finds one, you get a concrete test case demonstrating exactly what went wrong. Specification-guided fuzzing finds edge cases.

Most security tools flag potential issues Formal methods prove absence of bugs When Vanguard says a vulnerability pattern doesn't exist in your codebase, that's a mathematical guarantee Save time reviewing false positives & increase confidence in results youtube.com/watch?v=mFacEn…

Formal methods provide theoretical frameworks with soundness guarantees. When a verifier says your program is correct, that's a seal of approval backed by mathematical proof. Academic rigor applied to real-world security problems.

Basic code scanners pattern-match. Vanguard understands language semantics and provides formal descriptions of vulnerability classes. When it says a buggy pattern doesn't exist in your codebase, that's a mathematical proof, not a best-effort scan. youtube.com/watch?v=8CHAID…

ZK codebases are twice as likely to contain critical vulnerabilities. The difficult part: verifiers must accept all valid proofs while rejecting everything that proves incorrect statements. Unit tests only check the honest prover case. You need negative tests.

ZK circuits introduce a new programming paradigm most developers aren't used to yet. The prover-verifier interaction is tricky. Verifiers should never trust proofs blindly. Formal verification tools catch cases where your verifier accepts proofs proving incorrect statements.

Teams using verifiers like Picus iterate faster and produce secure code faster. This simplifies external audits and increases confidence internally and with users. Set up your security checks once, then you have a companion constantly checking for vulnerabilities as you commit.

Who actually pays for security in Web3? And is the current model working? Our CSO @BenSepanski took the stage at @ETHDenver's Security Summit to break down the real economics behind audits, bounties, and security incentives. The answer isn't as simple as most people think 👇

Formal verification for zkVMs: extract constraints the verifier checks, then run a verifier on those constraints. First check for nondeterministic circuits, then verify specific properties. Same process scales to systems as complex as zkVMs.