CesarConda

38.5K posts

CesarConda

CesarConda

@CesarConda

Founding Partner @navglobal. Former Chief of Staff to former Senator @marcorubio. @comm4prosperity economic advisory policy board

Washington DC Beigetreten Temmuz 2011
3.6K Folgt5.6K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
CesarConda
CesarConda@CesarConda·
Congratulations to my former boss, the former U.S. Senator from Florida, and now the 72nd U.S. Secretary of State! Those of us who served on your original Senate staff are incredibly proud. Congratulations and best wishes Secretary @marcorubio. c-span.org/program/white-…
English
1
3
27
1.8K
CesarConda retweetet
Stephen Moore
Stephen Moore@StephenMoore·
After the Trump Tax Cuts, the share of taxes paid by the rich went UP. Data from the House Ways and Means Committee shows lower income Americans saw larger tax relief. Facts matter, even if Democrats won’t admit it.
Stephen Moore tweet mediaStephen Moore tweet media
English
109
1.9K
4.2K
82.8K
CesarConda retweetet
borovik
borovik@3orovik·
Trump is playing 4D chess - War ends -> oil drops - inflation collapses - Powell out -> Kevin Warsh cuts rates - Liquidity floods into the economy - Markets giga pump (including crypto) Right into midterms Republicans sweep. That’s the plan
English
2K
853
9.2K
637.7K
CesarConda retweetet
Visegrád 24
Visegrád 24@visegrad24·
Passengers on a commercial flight captured the launch of Artemis II on camera The plane happened to pass near the launch trajectory at the exact moment of liftoff, giving passengers a rare view of the rocket launch right from their windows.
English
400
4.7K
25.3K
1.3M
CesarConda retweetet
Marc Thiessen 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇦🇹🇼🇮🇱
An incredible honor to be there for the President’s address to the nation on Iran. Had to wait till the networks cut away to applaud! No other president would have done this. The world will be safer because of his leadership.
English
294
657
5.4K
102.2K
CesarConda retweetet
Secretary Marco Rubio
President Trump delivered a powerful speech tonight. He was clear about our objectives in Iran: • Destroy their weapons factories • Destroy their navy • Destroy their air force • Destroy their chances of ever having a nuclear weapon The President’s leadership sends a message to the world that the United States will defend its people and its interests, and uphold peace through strength.
English
21.6K
14.4K
77.3K
3.2M
CesarConda retweetet
Melissa Chen
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen·
Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025. But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it. Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions. Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are. Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale. Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is. Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.” If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about? Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy. Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades. They couldn’t even manage that. So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates. If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.
English
1.3K
2.5K
11.8K
1.3M
CesarConda retweetet
Peter Meijer
Peter Meijer@PeterMeijer·
It would behoove our NATO allies to appreciate that this sentiment is *very* widely shared, including amongst erstwhile boosters of trans-Atlantic relations.
Peter Meijer tweet media
English
1.1K
1.2K
10.2K
1M
CesarConda
CesarConda@CesarConda·
Ignore media stories. Watch market price signals.
Nakul Sarda@nakul_sarda

I've stopped reading Gulf war headlines. Here's what I track instead. We run an India-focused equity fund. 85% of India's crude comes from imports. Half of that normally passes through Hormuz. So yes — this crisis is personal. But the information environment right now is garbage. Trump says the war ends tomorrow. Iran says Hormuz is shut forever. One analyst says $150 oil, another says $60. You can't build a portfolio view on this. So I've narrowed it down to 4 signals. These are priced by people with real money on the line. They don't lie. 1. Ship insurance premiums through Hormuz This is the single best signal. Lloyd's underwriters have billions at stake on every pricing call. Before the war, insuring a tanker through Hormuz cost 0.25% of the ship's value. Today it's 3.5–10% — and almost nobody is buying. A $100M tanker that cost $250K to insure now costs up to $10M. When this drops below 2%, the people with the most to lose are telling you it's getting safer. No press conference can replicate that. 2. How many ships are actually crossing Every ship carries a GPS tracker (AIS). You can count exactly how many cross Hormuz each day. Before: 100+. Now: 8. That's a 92% collapse. You can't spin a ship being somewhere it isn't. Iran is letting some Chinese and Indian ships through, but it's a trickle. When this number crosses 30–40, trade is resuming. You can track this free on the WTO Hormuz Trade Tracker. 3. Paper oil vs real oil This one most people miss entirely. Brent crude (the headline price) is at $112. But Dubai physical — what Asian buyers actually pay for delivered oil — is at $126. That's a $14 gap. It exists because Trump's comments keep pushing paper prices down. Traders call it jawboning. But the refiners buying cargo aren't getting any discount. If you're looking at Brent to assess India's oil bill, you're looking at the wrong number. 4. The mid-April cliff Multiple emergency measures expire around the same time. The 400 million barrel SPR release runs dry ~April 15. The US waiver letting India buy Russian crude expires. Formosa Plastics has declared force majeure from April 1. Right now these stopgaps are keeping the supply gap at ~5 mb/d. Without them, BCA Research estimates it doubles to 10 mb/d — the largest crude disruption ever. If Hormuz doesn't reopen by mid-April, we're in uncharted territory. Bottom line: track the insurance premium, the ship count, the paper-physical spread, and the April timeline. Everything else is noise.

English
0
0
0
70
CesarConda retweetet
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
Ryan Saavedra@RyanSaavedra

Secretary of State Marco Rubio gives an excellent explanation on why the U.S. needed to strike Iran It's less than 2 minutes and is worth the watch

English
987
7.2K
30.2K
3.7M
CesarConda retweetet
Navigators Global
Navigators Global@NavGlobal·
With the increasing importance of Secretary Rubio’s portfolio in the Administration, PI dove in on his notable K Street alumni, including @CesarConda 👇 📰: bit.ly/4c52irT
Navigators Global tweet media
English
0
1
2
325
CesarConda retweetet
Alex Salvi
Alex Salvi@alexsalvinews·
France, Italy and Spain not allowing the U.S. to use their airspace in Operation Epic Fury demonstrates why President Trump is pursuing control of Greenland. As I explain, the U.S. does not want to be dependent on—or restrained by—NATO allies in the event of a major conflict:
English
39
195
1.1K
20.9K
CesarConda retweetet
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: We’ll have to reexamine whether NATO is serving its purpose or has now become a one-way street where America is simply in a position to help Europe but when we need the help of our allies, they deny us basing rights and overflight.
English
283
525
2.4K
68.4K
CesarConda retweetet
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: NATO wasn’t just about defending Europe, but allowing us to have military bases in Europe for our national security. If we’ve reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can’t use those bases to defend our interests, then it’s a one-way street.
English
3K
3.9K
21.9K
1.2M
CesarConda
CesarConda@CesarConda·
@RiggsBarstool I don’t feel any empathy. Zero. Nada. His incredibly stupid decision to drive under the influence put other people’s lives at risk.
English
0
0
0
118
Riggs
Riggs@RiggsBarstool·
I feel a lot of frustration towards Tiger Woods & the decisions he continues to make & I think he deserves to be punished for putting people in danger. I also feel a lot of empathy towards the man & hope he gets help in getting better through a low point.
English
507
9
547
312.4K
CesarConda retweetet
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: This is a regime led by people who believe it is their calling and purpose in life to usher in the end of the world. These are the people who want nuclear weapons.
English
338
987
3.6K
105.4K
CesarConda retweetet
Ryan Saavedra
Ryan Saavedra@RyanSaavedra·
Secretary of State Marco Rubio gives an excellent explanation on why the U.S. needed to strike Iran It's less than 2 minutes and is worth the watch
English
1.3K
5.8K
29.1K
3.2M
CesarConda retweetet
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
I’ve been writing this book for a long time, and I’m honored to finally be able to share the full story with you all. Communion is about my personal journey and how I found my way back to faith. It will be available in June, but you can pre-order today: a.co/d/0cTpceI7
JD Vance tweet media
English
8.3K
3.1K
26.2K
2.9M
CesarConda retweetet
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: The blackouts in Cuba have nothing to do with us. They’re having blackouts because they have equipment from the 1950s in their grid that has never been maintained or upgraded because their leaders are incompetent.
English
1.2K
3.6K
18.9K
313.6K
CesarConda
CesarConda@CesarConda·
@Daniel_Rapaport Tiger should serve time in jail. He is putting other people’s lives at risk.
English
0
0
0
28
Dan Rapaport
Dan Rapaport@Daniel_Rapaport·
Tiger arrested behind the wheel. Again.
English
2.3K
125
4K
11.4M