gemhunter

90 posts

gemhunter banner
gemhunter

gemhunter

@CryptoGemHunte

Beigetreten Ocak 2023
502 Folgt165 Follower
gemhunter
gemhunter@CryptoGemHunte·
@rebeccaperrotto @SpaceX That’s great news for Liv and your family! I hope you feel well Liv would be very proud of you!
gemhunter tweet media
English
3
8
26
1.3K
Rebecca Perrotto
Rebecca Perrotto@rebeccaperrotto·
Sign up to be notified when Asteroid is back in stock! I have to admit… I completely broke down in tears when I saw this on the SpaceX website. My beautiful girl Liv dreamed of the stars, and now her Asteroid, is officially part of the @SpaceX family. ❤️ This one hits different. For Liv. Always for Liv. Thank you @elonmusk 🫶🥺 shop.spacex.com/collections/ac…
Rebecca Perrotto tweet media
English
216
252
1.2K
117.2K
gemhunter
gemhunter@CryptoGemHunte·
@Quanterty Yes, with asteroid you are right, but there is only one asteroid with IP, USPTO and EUIPO registered, and it’s @AsteroidCoinOG that’s mean only one will win, one and only ! @AsteroidCoinOG
English
0
0
1
7
HTX
HTX@HTX_Global·
POV: candle printing the second you sell
English
57
23
230
15.3K
HTX
HTX@HTX_Global·
boarding... who's locked in for liftoff ✈️🫡
HTX tweet media
English
289
189
943
62.7K
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Elon Musk explains the Kardashev Scale: "That's the most objective metric that any alien species, say, visiting us would calibrate how much progress we've made as a civilization, and one of the most objective ways to do that is the amount of power that any given civilization has been able to harness, and there was a Russian physicist, actually, who thought about this, and it's, I think, it's a good way to characterize it, which is you can have, you can assess how well a civilization is harnessing the power available on the planet, that's type I. And then type II would be how much of the star's power are you harnessing, and then type III would be how much of the galaxy's power are you harnessing. These are very objective and measurable numbers, so right now we're very low on the Kardashev I scale, like, what proportion of our planet's power are we harnessing, it's a very, very tiny number, and basically we're harnessing almost nothing of our stars' power, so the sun is truly an immense state. We don't even know how to do level III, really. AI will figure it out. One way to appreciate the size of the sun is to think about how heavy is the sun compared to all the rest of the mass in the solar system. So, the sun is about 99.86% of all mass in the solar system. It's everything, and then all the remaining 1.14% most of that is Jupiter, one planet."
English
154
269
1K
53.4K
gemhunter
gemhunter@CryptoGemHunte·
@10xgemhunter Tell me you are idiot without telling me you are idiot…. You definitely won this
English
0
0
1
71
Don 🐂
Don 🐂@DonWedge·
Which coin will 1000x?
English
132
12
184
34K
HTX
HTX@HTX_Global·
building towards breakout… 🌋 who can HODL heat fr
HTX tweet media
English
345
254
1.2K
112K
Jiun 阿尔法
Jiun 阿尔法@jiunCrypto·
Of course the S&P 500 just hit a new ATH today… Binance Stocks went live today and Wall Street said “Send S&P 500 to ATH” 7,000+ stocks in your Binance app. The bulls didn’t pump it. Binance did. It is like moving so fast like an Asteroid.
Jiun 阿尔法 tweet media
English
14
26
65
1.5K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Those who invested $10.41 in IBM in 1932 are now millionaires.
English
817
497
12.5K
4.9M
Binance
Binance@binance·
At this point, my feed is just Binance Stocks. 😅
English
299
57
930
118.8K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
There's probably under-claimed win-wins between the two groups. The problem is that the existing institutions for mediating the conflict are extremely high-friction. eg strawman: have a rule that buildings that are in the top 50 percentile of making neighborhood aesthetics types happy pay 0.1% less property tax, and the rest pay 0.1% more that would probably get you significantly better aesthetics, with very low cost to efficiency or freedom or dynanism or other good things? eg strawman 2: keep big pharma but make the incentives favor a much more open-science approach to safety and efficacy verification you get significantly better public trust, with very low cost to scientists being able to do their thing?
English
30
14
110
19K
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Reminder: Good: big pharma, capitalism. Bad: community organizers, zealous city council meeting attendees, retirees who feels it's their duty to maintain the character of the local neighborhood.
English
48
133
2.3K
84.6K
MEXC
MEXC@MEXC·
One thing you’re taking into June:
English
166
21
306
27.4K