Mrs. Strom

3.7K posts

Mrs. Strom banner
Mrs. Strom

Mrs. Strom

@Decidedly_Blue

Decidedly Blue

Montana, USA Beigetreten Mayıs 2017
2.8K Folgt2K Follower
Ron DeSantis
Ron DeSantis@RonDeSantis·
Ladies and gentlemen, we need this man in Washington. Will you join me in supporting his campaign today?
English
93
78
584
124.4K
Mrs. Strom retweetet
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️@mmpadellan·
We watched trump and MAGA spend the past two months calling Kamala Harris dumb, a Marxist, a Communist, and slut shaming her, so y'all can shut the fuck up entirely about OUR rhetoric. I might note that Kamala Harris could have dragged trump for his being all over the Epstein flight logs and call logs. She could've spent WAY more time calling him a convicted felon. But she held back, probably because trump was doing more damage to himself than she was. I'm sick and tired of the bullshit game MAGA plays, letting him treat everyone like shit, and then when we fight back, they cry like little bitches. You don't like the salty language? Get your own fucking asshole to clean up his act.
English
2.3K
6.1K
24.6K
588.3K
Mrs. Strom retweetet
Senator Chris Larson
Senator Chris Larson@SenChrisLarson·
If you don't like gay marriage, don't get gay married If you don't like gender-affirming care, don't have any If you don't believe in abortion, don't get one If you don't think your kid should read a certain book, stop them But don't tell others how to live their lives.
English
9K
11.8K
68K
2.6M
Mrs. Strom retweetet
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ@LePapillonBlu2·
Please follow everyone who replies to this post with a 💙
ᗰᗩƳᖇᗩ tweet media
English
2.5K
4.6K
13.7K
203.3K
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive. President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.) I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric. Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones. How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months? NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly. PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan. The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot. This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent. Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff). Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored. Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership. The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up. Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up. This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it. It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not. For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes. Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail. I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.
English
17.3K
51.8K
203.7K
18.8M
Morgan J. Freeman
Morgan J. Freeman@mjfree·
Kamala Harris will be the first woman to serve as President of the United States. 💙 if u believe
Morgan J. Freeman tweet media
English
8.6K
7.2K
62.8K
985.5K
Mrs. Strom
Mrs. Strom@Decidedly_Blue·
Who thinks the Tesla logo looks like an IUD? Just me?
Mrs. Strom tweet media
English
0
0
2
97
Mrs. Strom
Mrs. Strom@Decidedly_Blue·
@GregForMontana As long as this country is plagued with mass school shootings, our children need their phones in order to be able to call for help.
English
1
0
3
133
Greg Gianforte
Greg Gianforte@GregForMontana·
This may be controversial, but I believe cell phones have no place in our schools. They harm our kids, lead to learning loss, and I want them gone. Do you agree? I’d appreciate it if you’d take this quick poll and let me know!
English
25
8
63
16.9K
Mrs. Strom retweetet
Tim Walz
Tim Walz@Tim_Walz·
Swifties: With your help, we’re gonna defeat the smallest man who ever lived.
English
8.7K
13.9K
99.8K
4M
Mrs. Strom retweetet
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
There are only 50 days left until Election Day. And there's too much at stake to sit this one out. So get involved in any way you can. Knock on doors or make phone calls for the Harris-Walz campaign. Talk to your friends, family, and neighbors about why it’s important to vote in this election. And make sure you’re registered and ready to vote by going to IWillVote.com/Obama. Because if we work like we’ve never worked before, we will elect @KamalaHarris as our next President and @Tim_Walz as our next Vice President. And together, we will build a better future.
Barack Obama tweet media
English
22.6K
29.6K
249.9K
44.3M
A
A@bluhue123·
Drop a 💙 if you Love Taylor Swift
A tweet media
English
4.8K
1.4K
15.9K
321K
Mrs. Strom retweetet
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️@mmpadellan·
I think it's HILARIOUS how many MAGAts were making fun of all the days Kamala Harris spent in preparation for the debate, and now they're like "durr, did she get the questions beforehand? Was she wearing an earpiece?" No, you idiots. She fucking PREPARED her ass off. She laid traps for trump like rakes on a lawn. And he stepped on every single one. She called him a disgrace TO HIS FACE. He couldn't even make eye contact. She whooped his ass.
BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ tweet media
English
2.7K
6.1K
26.4K
722.7K
Mrs. Strom
Mrs. Strom@Decidedly_Blue·
@realDonaldJNews The truth is @VP is smarter than you. She spent a week extensively practicing, unlike you. Anyone with half a brain could acticipate the types of questions they would ask and prepare. That's why she came across prepared, poised, and articulate, unlike you, a broken record.
English
0
0
0
0
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
In Springfield, Ohio, there has been a massive rise in communicable diseases, rent prices, car insurance rates, and crime. This is what happens when you drop 20,000 people into a small community. Kamala Harris's immigration policy aims to do this to every town in our country.
English
11.8K
13.6K
60.2K
14M