🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC
3.5K posts
🔞YFNC
@DiffuseSanction
NSFW account. I retweet a lot of BDSM art, so be forewarned, and if need be, avert your gaze.
Between myself and the Id Beigetreten Mart 2019
555 Folgt79 Follower
🔞YFNC retweetet
>Ahsoka with the Togruta stare
Thanks for reminding me
Robertweet@RoberOropeza
@Uravity98114 That view with the Togruta stare uff 👌
English
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
Meta has been pouring MILLIONS into their lobbying for Age verification, which is a trojan horse for digital ID and mass surveillance, for years.
They want to pass the buck to force us to identify ourselves at the OS level. They want more data and they don't care if it leaks
alpha@omarsbigsister
the lawsuit against facebook isn't even going to hurt facebook, lmao. instead the legal theory it's based off of is going to be used by every single tort lawyer across this country to sue every single website to remove "harmful" content. say goodbye to small websites!
English
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
they are trying them all to try and hide how this is not about the kids but about trying to spy on everything we say in private all the time
THEY EVEN MADE THE BLACK AND WHITE AD THING WHERE OH NOOOO SCARY COMMUNIST (RED LOGO) PARTY WANTS TO DO HARM TO YOUR KIDS
BROOOOOOOOOOOOO
EPP Group@EPPGroup
Two words for the Socialists: completely irresponsible. They chose to kill the deal on extending rules on the detection and reporting of child sexual abuse online. That means - shielding online predators and leaving children unprotected! They knew that any changes beyond the EPP Group’s single technical amendment - already backed by Member States - would force the file back into long negotiations, creating a protection gap. Protecting children should never be about political games. And yet, they went ahead. So did Renew, ECR, and the Greens. By doing so, these groups blocked the only workable solution to maintain the detection and reporting of child sexual abuse online. Let’s be clear: what is illegal offline must also be illegal online. Read more: epp.group/hnx8nb88
English
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
@JxnW >Consensual does not mean healthy.
This is true in a narrow sense (I can consent to be injured), but very dangerous to argue in a broad sense, since health is a normative category, and we want peoples' sense of what's good for them to matter for what we consider healthy for them.
English
Three things to remember during the social goonicide:
(1) Consensual does not mean healthy.
(2) There is no such thing as an uncoerced decision. Sexual values are instilled into you.
(3) Sexual desires reflect our insecurities. They are a microcosm of interpersonal needs.
Joam Luxurious@JxnW
Full blown sexual psychosis. Sexual violence, sex work, sexualizing athletes, politicians, news anchors. Epstein, Diddy, Andrew Tate. Sex jokes, chem sex, purity test, BDSM test, sex podcasts, incels, 4b, anal sex, pornography, sex. Sex sex sex sex sex sex sex sex sex sex sex s
English
@JihadalHaqq Besides assumptions about internet discourse, I have seen no credible evidence that gen Z is more puritanical than previous generations. Women 18 - 24 now report having more sex with more partners than older gens (though it's still a lot more modest than one could think)
English
This is a side effect of the higher rates of social isolation among Gen Z. It's not pointed out much but envy (or Nietzsche's "ressentiment") is a powerful driver of social culture and politics, up to and include sexual envy that manifests on the surface as "puritanism".
princess ౨ৎ@puppetgrl_
gen z has demonized sex & sexual desire so much that we’ve forgotten sex and desiring people is a natural, normal, healthy thing lol. having absolutely no sex drive and never wanting to have sex w the person you like is not normal. idk why it’s seen as being “lustful”
English
@Srirachachau That's why the good god created torrents, so that we could have ethical consumption under capitalism
English
People can watch whatever they want but Rowling is personally funding anti-trans legislation with every dollar she profits off Harry Potter. It’s not just a stance she has, it’s her whole mission. There’s no deniability here, it’s what you’re supporting
Variety@Variety
J.K. Rowling Says 'I’m So Happy' With HBO’s 'Harry Potter' Series Right After Celebrating the Olympics for Banning Trans Women From Female Events variety.com/2026/tv/news/j…
English
🔞YFNC retweetet
🔞YFNC retweetet
“Socialists are responsible for killing chat control”
EPP Group@EPPGroup
SOCIALISTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LEAVING CHILDREN UNPROTECTED The EPP Group condemns today’s move by Socialists, together with Renew, ECR and Greens, to table new amendments that have derailed the extension of EU rules against online child sexual abuse – just days before the current law expires on 3 April. This plays directly into the hands of online sex predators. From the outset, it was clear: any changes beyond the EPP Group’s single technical amendment – already backed by Member States – would kill the deal by forcing the file back into lengthy negotiations, leaving no time to avoid a protection gap. By taking this path, these groups have blocked the only workable solution to maintain detection and reporting of child sexual abuse online. “Despite EPP efforts, S&D failed to lead the process, preventing an agreement with EU Member States. This is completely irresponsible,” said Javier Zarzalejos MEP, EPP Group negotiator on the file. “Protecting children is not optional,” said Lena Düpont MEP, EPP Group spokeswoman on Legal and Home Affairs. “Stop hiding behind excuses and take responsibility. This leaves children exposed and offenders unchallenged.” What is illegal offline must also be illegal online. Reports of child sexual abuse have surged from 1 million in 2010 to over 20 million in 2024, while online grooming has increased twelvefold in just three years. Extending the current rules was not a final fix, but a necessary bridge. Forcing new negotiations now risks a legal vacuum, leaves children exposed, and weakens law enforcement across Europe. @zarzalejosj @LenaDuepontMdEP 📰epp.group/hnx8nb88
English
@Dr0wsyRoses The way you're viewing this is that there is a single, simple and one-sided desire that is simply redirected to fantastical objects to avoid moral, legal, or social constraints, but is otherwise just the same desire. I don't think NC fantasies are just sublated desire though.
English
@Dr0wsyRoses That's a simple way to view it, but what if human desire is actually much more granular and multi-sided that that, and I don't want to rape someone in the same way that I enjoy abusing the fictional characters that live in my head?
English
You can’t rape a fictional character but the want to rape someone is still something you have and fantasize about and you’ve normalized it in your head by projecting your desires onto fictional characters.
faux 💤@faaauuux
@creepydollyy @keisnoodlepot you can't rape something that doesn't fucking exist. fictional characters are entirely man-made creations, they have no feelings, no thoughts, no rights, because they don't fucking exist. You're making a mockery out of rape victims by grouping us with fictional """rape""".
English