Matthew Dyer

@HwsEleutheroi With all due respect, you do this all the time on The Dividing Line.

This was complete false advertising. I actually joined in to hear. He spent about 80 minutes blathering on about his pet topics, saying over and over, "I'll get to the Ogden stuff, just a minute..." And then, at the end, he spent less than sixty seconds to say, "I will see them again at the next conference." That was it. Period. What utter rot. So MASSIVELY disrespectful!

@BlksmithofBwine @JoelWebbon My thought exactly

@JoelWebbon Like someone has never opened a”Dividing Line” with a 45 minute discussion about the previous weekend’s bicycle ride! I wonder if he has any self awareness sometimes.

Gonna frame this and hang it in my office.

Should Churches Be Segregated? When the subject of biblical kinism arises, one may wonder if it is proper if Churches should be racially mixed. With the rising number of immigrants from all nationalities flooding America, as well as every other western nation, it’s a valid question. With the scriptural evidence already provided in this book that reveals God intended for the different races to be separate, it should be clear that this would include membership of a local congregation. As one example, if there was ever a time in biblical history for God to communicate to Israel that they should have a mixed congregation would have been during the days of Ezra and Nehemiah (see chapter 2). All these Israelite men would have had to do is divorce their foreign wives in order to repent from their sin and then teach each group of people they were forbidden to marry one another within the congregation. But this is not what happened. The Israelites separated from these people and sent them away. Nehemiah 13:3 states: “Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.” The Israelites were convicted on separating from these foreigners when they heard the Law of God. Among the scriptures being read, I imagine one of the laws might have been Leviticus 20:26 that says God “severed [separated] you from other people, that ye should be mine.” I believe the reason segregation is necessary, besides the command to be separate, is because if you have a mixed congregation, it is highly probable in time some of the children will marry someone outside of their race. Certainly, this is one of the reasons the Israelites sent their foreign wives and children away, in order that those of their own posterity would not be tempted to commit the same sin they did. This position on keeping the races separate from each other from a biblical point of view has been held by both white and black Christians not long ago in America. The following quote is from a black minister named Rev. Tebo Wilson, who pastored the Sweet Rest Baptist Church in Franklinton, LA, stating his position on segregated Churches: “In the south United States, where there is a heavy negro population, I favor segregation, a hundred percent. I am against integration, and I want my people to know it, and I am telling them at every opportunity that the Southern white man is our best friend because he has been helping us in every way possible for many years. We need the Southern white man’s leadership, and they are not misleading us like those outsiders are doing. We had better stick to our home friends and follow their guidance. I believe if integration does come that it will cause plenty of trouble. We will not have any trouble brought upon us if we do not follow the bad advice of outsiders. I am a peace loving, law abiding American citizen, born in Louisiana. I have been a minister of the Gospel fourteen years. I preach to my congregation that which I believe is right and that integration is wrong since segregation as God has done is and as the old prophets ordered it, the keeping of God’s different races to themselves is the best for the negro and the white races. It is wrong to send our people to strange churches and our little children into strange schools… I give this statement of my own free will, in fact, I insisted to a white friend that I would like to add my voice and my efforts in helping to maintain peaceful relations among our people. I think Mr. Lanier is doing a wonderful thing by resisting integration and I never met a finer fair man.” Charles Hodge, a well-known reformed Presbyterian theologian who was the principal of Princeton Theological Seminary between 1851 and 1878, wrote the following in his book Emancipation concerning the mixing of the races: “Another feature of that plan was the expatriation of the liberated blacks. This also when feasible is wise. There are natural laws which forbid the union of distinct races in the same commonwealth. Where the difference is slight, as between Saxons and Celts, or the Teutonic and Romaic families, the different elements are soon fused. But even here we find that they often refuse to combine and remain apart for ages, the weaker constantly sinking, and the stronger constantly advancing. We have examples of this in the French paysans of Canada, and Louisiana. The effect of the amalgamation of distinct races is seen in the physically, intellectually and socially degraded mongrel inhabitants of Mexico and South America. In these cases the chief elements were the Spanish and Indians, elements less widely separated than the Anglo Saxon and the Negro. The amalgamation of these races must inevitably lead to the deterioration of both. It would fill the country with a feeble and degraded population, which must ultimately perish. For it is a well ascertained fact that the mulatto is far more frail than either the white man or the negro. "We read in the disastrous physical effects of the amalgamation of the blacks and whites, a clear intimation that such amalgamation is contrary to the will of God, and therefore is not an end which statesmen ought in any way to facilitate.” Pastor Henry W. Fancher wrote the following in his book Segregation: God’s Plan and Purpose: “The MASTER in HIS intercessory prayer made this plea: “Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.” John 17:11. Recently some writer quoted the words “may be one” as an argument for doing away with our requirements of separation, and as a reason why white people should attend the services of negro churches, and vice versa, if not join them. But what kind of oneness does JESUS have in mind in this phrase? Do not the following words, “even as we are” tell what HE meant? Since GOD and HIS son exist only as Spirits, their unity could be nothing but spiritual. JESUS must, therefore, be making a petition for the spiritual unity of all believers. It is very clear that those who oppose separate schools, colleges, churches, and public gathering for white peoples and negroes want to destroy both races and people our country with mulattoes. Those who want to put the MASTER’S stamp of approval upon the inter marriage of whites and blacks do not find authority to do so in this verse of scripture.” Dr. Guy T. Gillespie, who was a pastor in the PCUS (Presbyterian Church in the United States) and president of the denomination’s school of Belhaven College in Jackson, Mississippi, wrote the following in his book A Christian View of Segregation: “The problem has also been complicated by the worldwide spread of Karl Marx's doctrine of Internationalism and classless society, combined with the vigorous propaganda of Soviet Communism to bring about a world revolution and break down of all national and racial distinctions and to effect the complete amalgamation of all races… At present the rank and file of the negro race are not particularly interested in intermarriage with the white race, and if left to themselves would probably never seek it; however, the self-appointed leaders of the anti-segregation movement are not only fully aware of the inherent and logical implications of their demand for the repudiation of the principle of segregation, but make bold to declare that the goal which they seek in America is "a social democracy which either begins with marriage, or necessarily includes marriage in its ideals and principles” Pastor Carey Daniel D.D., who pastored The First Baptist Church of West Dallas, said the following in his book God the Original Segregationist: "But the oneness here, like the oneness Jesus prayed for in John 17:11, is purely spiritual and not physical. Neither this nor any other Scripture contradicts God's fixed laws of racial segregation. This verse does not, as some well-meaning people keep insisting nowadays, require the social mingling of Negroes and white people in our schools and churches or anywhere else. It does not require, for example, that I allow my daughter to marry a negro, and I would be a fool to think that impossible if desegregation in our public schools is thrust upon us. Does anyone really doubt that intermarriage and mongrelization are inevitable if this happens? Does anyone actually think it possible to mix millions of black and white school children in the close and constant association of classrooms, the playground and the dining hall without having to invite both together to all the parties, swims, dances and other social activities? The negro would scream "discrimination" to the skies if they were left out. And can any sensible person imagine such a situation as that without the interracial dating, courtship and marriage (not to mention worse evils) that would naturally follow?” Pastor John W. Duggar, who pastored the Parkview Baptist Church in Laurel, Mississippi, wrote the following in his book God’s Answer to Segregation: A Scriptural Treatment of the Racial Issue: “God does not accept a mixture of heresy and truth. The does not justify the means, for the lawful cannot be attained in God's sight by unlawful means. Christ warned his disciples to beware of the leaven (doctrine) of the Pharisees. The same God who will not condone these mixtures in religion or worship would hardly approve the mixing of the races which, in Genesis chapter nine and many other Scriptures by precept and example, he decreed to be separate." NOTE: This is a section out of my book A Case for Biblical Kinism. Read for free at ChristianAmericaMinistries.org or order a copy on Amazon.

@spanglermt @PastorAndyWebb Well said.

@PastorAndyWebb This is your fault. Those responsible did nothing because they were afraid of being called racists. You stoke that same fear every day. Your crusade against “Kinism” sells poor little White girls into the hands of brown-skinned savages.

"Police forces ignored repeated reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail. Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers. The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care. Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them." I hold a very high bar for the right to revolt against your magistrate, but if the electoral process in Britain doesn't remove the regime that allowed (or more properly advanced) this protracted atrocity and they remain in power, I'd say it's time for the lower magistrate to lead the British people against their incredibly corrupt oppressors.

@elimcgowan A Church like the RPCNA, yes. A Christian Church, no. @ket38111 will be blessed for standing for truth.

@DyerMatthewD You wrote a book for Kinism, you’d be excommunicated from a Christian church too.

The RPCNA Synod today rejected all parts of Samuel Ketcham’s appeal of his excommunication from the Christian church for Kinism and white supremacy. We continue to pray for his repentance. “Do not even eat with such a person.”

Amen!

On break, will respond quickly to this: Sum: “It wasn’t his opinions, it was his manner of propagating them.” Or, more commonly: “It’s not your doctrine, it’s your tone.” This is effeminate, and deceitful. They are persecuting Sam chiefly for his doctrine.

We are doing a live stream this Friday at 7pm CST where you will be able to call into the program. Link below. youtube.com/watch?v=MWSvan…

@spanglermt @ket38111 @RPCNA Praying for you both. Will they be recording the proceedings?

With @ket38111 at the @RPCNA Synod, awaiting his appeal. Thank you to all the friends who are praying, I will keep you posted.

What Are “Nāḵrî” Strangers? To further highlight that these strange wives were indeed foreign kindreds to the Israelites, we can look at the Hebrew word nāḵrî rendered as “strange” in our English Bibles in Ezra 10. This Hebrew word is used elsewhere in the Bible to identify someone that is a foreign kindred to the Israelites, not just someone who does not believe like them. Deuteronomy 15:3 states: “Of a foreigner thou mayest exact it again: but that which is thine with thy brother thine hand shall release” In this passage the word foreigner is rendered from nāḵrî, and is contrasted with “thy brother.” The Hebrew word rendered as brother in this passage and brethren in others is 'āḥ, which in this context is being used for physical kindred. Deuteronomy 17:15 states: “Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.” In this passage the word stranger is rendered from nāḵrî and is contrasted with “thy brethren” and “thy brother.” The Israelites were not to have any racial stranger over them as a ruler. Deuteronomy 23:20 states: “Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.” In this passage the word stranger is rendered from nāḵrî and is contrasted with “thy brother.” The Israelites could charge usury (interest) on loans to kindreds outside of their own people, this command could NOT be obeyed unless the Israelites were kinist. In The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary written by Robert Jamieson, Andrew Robert Fausset and David Brown, they said the following concerning this passage: “The Israelites lived in a simple state of society, and hence they were encouraged to lend to each other in a friendly way without any hope of gain. But the case was different with foreigners, who, engaged in trade and commerce, borrowed to enlarge their capital, and might reasonably be expected to pay interest on their loans. Besides, the distinction was admirably conducive to keeping the Israelites separate from the rest of the world.” Judges 19:12 states: “And his master said unto him, We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger, that is not of the children of Israel; we will pass over to Gibeah.” In this passage the word stranger is rendered from nāḵrî and is contrasted with a people “that is not of the children of Israel.” 1 Kings 8:41 states: “Moreover concerning a stranger, that is not of thy people Israel, but cometh out of a far country for thy name's sake.” In this passage the word stranger is rendered from nāḵrî and is contrasted with a people that is “not of thy people Israel” and from a far country. With those verses in mind that identify who a nāḵrî stranger is in a biblical context, let us now consider the following verses from the Book of Proverbs where this word appears, and the warnings given. Proverbs 2:16 states: “To deliver thee from the strange woman, even from the stranger which flattereth with her words.” In this verse it is giving the warning that one must flee from the strange woman, which in the context of this passage is speaking of a harlot. Then gives an additional warning “even from the stranger,” the English word stranger here is rendered from the Hebrew word nāḵrî, which is a person from a kindred different than your own. Proverbs 6:20-24 states: “My son, keep thy father's commandment, and forsake not the law of thy mother: Bind them continually upon thine heart, and tie them about thy neck. When thou goest, it shall lead thee; when thou sleepest, it shall keep thee; and when thou awakest, it shall talk with thee. For the commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life: To keep thee from the evil woman, from the flattery of the tongue of a strange woman.” In this passage the word strange is rendered from nāḵrî and it says that the commandment of your father and mother is a lamp and a light to keep you away from the flattery of the strange woman, which in this case is speaking of a nāḵrî foreigner. The context of all Proverbs is Godly wisdom, so the way that this passage is written is speaking of parents giving their son Godly Commandments to follow. Like we saw in the case of the Israelites during Ezra’s day, they had forgotten the Commandments of God and were flattered by the nāḵrî foreigner. Proverbs 23:27 states: “For a whore is a deep ditch; and a strange woman is a narrow pit.” In this passage the word strange is rendered from nāḵrî and is contrasted with a whore/prostitute, so we know that we are not speaking of the same thing, although going into the harlot and the nāḵrî woman is lumped together as related sins, which would fall under the sin of fornication. As we can see from all these passages, the nāḵrî person was a foreigner outside of the kindred of Israel, and it was considered a sin to marry into them. The Israelite nation was a kinist nation when they obeyed God, and the Scriptures reveal us that when they disobeyed God, they forsook biblical kinism. NOTE: This is a section out of my book A Case for Biblical Kinism. Read for free at ChristianAmericaMinistries.org or order a copy on Amazon.

@Dude_ukn If I had panned the camera over a bit to the right you would have seen my copy of Charles Thompson's translation.

@DyerMatthewD The Septuagint Old Testamant Translation (Charles Thomson) 1808 archive.org/details/ENGSOT…

The Jews are NOT God's Chosen People #jews #israel #abraham Who is Israel? (A Scriptural Examination of Some of the Identification Marks of Israel) link below: youtube.com/watch?v=snfO_0…

"Elect a clown, expect a circus" 🤡🤡🤡

Good morning! I hope everyone is doing well. As a reminder, you can join Christian-Israel Fellowship for Church service at 11:30am CST on the livestream at the link below: youtube.com/watch?v=JGfdBg…

@carpatho_rusyn Check our broadcast schedule on our website. We have a broadcast every evening during the weekdays and 4 times on the weekends.

@DyerMatthewD I have a shortwave but not at this house. I will remedy that

Tonight's broadcast starts soon. Watch below or tune in on shortwave radio on 9.395 mhz. *I said it was 9.455 mhz the other day. That is our Friday slot, not Saturday. youtube.com/watch?v=8m8oy4…

This is an old clip from the Coral Ridge Hour back in the mid-1990s, about how a Church was padlocked and the contents were stolen out of it because they failed to sign up as a political action committee because they opposed a city ordinance dealing with sodomy. I and my family were friends with Pastor Peters for almost two decades, and I have many fond memories with him.