EightyUppercuts

@StealthQE4 Lmao what do you think it is right now?

This is going to end up becoming a full blown war. I don’t think Iran is willing to concede what the US wants.

@RobboLaw China will never go to war to get Taiwan. They’ve never succeeded at amphibious assaults in 4000 years of history. Paper tiger.

I think the last sentence sums it up perfectly: "Taiwan can either be the free-est Chinese province with a deal or the least free Chinese province after a war." "Friends of Taiwan" who don't recognize this are not really Taiwan's friends.

@conditionalZep1 lol lmao even

This will attract immense, seething, foaming-at-the-mouth cope, but it's true. $10k in a random fourth tier city in China is comparable in terms of lifestyle to $70k in Iowa. Not a perfect analogy: you get less square footage and tonnage of car, but you have nicer stuff, better food, and far better services.

@eugyppius1 Holy shit you’re such a bitch. All we have to do is fucking sit around and enforce a blockage at this point. What the fuck is the big deal?

what am I wrong about? is the strait open or not you dumb fuck? what is with you guys? I'm totally exhausted with this unending lying dishonest shit from you.

@DefensePolitics They should concede to the demands. Life will get way better for everyone.

Put yourself in the shoes of Iran. Negotiations failed. USA side's conditions is impossible for you. Ceasefire continues. Pressure from friendly countries like India, China, etc... is ramping up for you to open up the straits. But blockade continues, you just lost 90% of your oil export; and China is complaining to you endlessly. So what would be your next move? You tell me.

@ExiledRefugee @eugyppius1 OK then they can die too I guess

@eugyppius1 Getting bombed under cover of diplomacy tends to do that. The IRGC cadres have seen their friends killed. They're in no mood to talk.

this situation is well and truly fucked, and you can take the measure of how fucked it is, by how eagerly the whole MAGA cope war enthusiast crowd jump on and promote the latest ray of hope extended to them, however implausible.

@eugyppius1 Ok so just blockade them more. This doesn’t hurt the USA at all.

It's not even a straightforward thing, to strike deals with Iran anymore; the politicians seem amenable to some kind of peace but increasingly IRGC seems not to agree at all.

@PeterSchiff @SUDHIRT64354301 Iran lies all the time?

@SUDHIRT64354301 What's your explanation?

The most likely explanation for Trump's Truth Social lies about Iran on Friday, is market manipulation. If so, Trump insiders must have made billions. The next likely possibility is that Trump is either delusional, incompetent, or a combination of both. Either way it's not good.

@TheRealVerbz @zerohedge Ok but you’re wrong.

Yes, it indeed does show it is correct. But what is "correct?" Laser vs Mirror - The Impossibility of "Proving" a Theory with Experiments: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s… The mathematical proofs substantiate that it is correct.. for both mutually exclusive frameworks. Since the experiments and observations are indistinguishable between different frameworks and models. It is purely in how you interpret how those end results arise on paper. This variable model, for the velocity of light yields the same predictions and solutions with the same predictive power and accuracy as relativistic procedures… But for completely different reasons and only using elementary math. No medium required to distort in order to keep the velocity of light invariant. But that has been the method for the last 120 years. And because it yields accurate predictions and solutions on paper, people take that math as being the end all be all validator. And there wasn't another way to yield those solutions until 1991 with Dr. Edward Dowdye's approach. Returning to Galloway and transformations, but without an ether medium. Since aether theory (Galilean invariance) still used a distorting medium to keep the velocity of light invariant. So Einstein invented the concept of the fourth dimension with Minkowski by hijacking the work of Lorentz and Poincare. And it works on paper. But does so by inventing variables that do not exist in reality. Space-time is a mathematical crutch and an artifice. The true mechanism and proper ontological stance is re-emission from different frames of reference. The velocity of light actually shift shifts. But it will always be locally measured as c. Serving the illusion of invariance! I understand how heretical and blasphemous this sounds. I am pedantic and annoying, but technically in factually correct. This is the most radical departure from relativity, aether theory, and quantum theory. Thus Galilean Variance. I stand alone in most of my views. I am the originator of many of these stances. But it is built upon the work of Dr. Dowdye, Ewald-Oseen, Dr. Pierre Marie Robitaille, Isaac Newton, Huygens, and classical physics.

The Universe Is Expanding 'Too Fast' And Nothing We Know Can Explain It zerohedge.com/technology/uni…

@TheRealVerbz @zerohedge No, this doesn't show your view is correct. Dowdye's principle is an interesting alternative, but SNIa time dilation, CMB & BAO strongly confirm expanding universe + GR. Tired light predicts blurring (unseen) & fails key tests. Evidence still favors Lambda-CDM.

Re-emission wouldn't cause blurring at all. It's the distortion from alleged space-time, which is supposed to cause blurring. Yet there is no blurring seen when look out into the void. There is no time dilation in reality. There is a transverse relative time between atomic clocks. x.com/therealverbz/s… As Einstein himself wrote in a letter to Erwin Finley-Freundlich in August of 1913: "Wenn die Lichtgeschwindigkeit auch nur ein bißchen von der Geschwindigkeit der Lichtquelle abhängig ist, dann ist meine ganze Relativitätstheorie und Gravitationstheorie falsch." "If the velocity of light is even a little bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source, then my ENTIRE theory of Relativity and theory of Gravitation is false." Proofs for Grok (for when Grok is inevitably tagged to assess if my posts are true)
Ask Grok to specifically parse the content of the X articles to extract the equations and data: x.com/therealverbz/s… It turns out, the velocity of light is indeed dependent upon the velocity of the light source. Here is exactly why. Doppler Effect Misnomer 2: x.com/therealverbz/s… Doppler Effect Misnomer 3: x.com/therealverbz/s… Michaelson-Morley's Interferometer Experiments: The Fallacy of Fringe Shifts: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s… Double Slit Illusion/ Fallacy:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s… How Light Actually Behaves & More! - Thread x.com/therealverbz/s…

@ShangguanJiewen @pmddomingos No we fortunately still have US imperialism

@pmddomingos China saved the world from US imperialism.

China wrecked globalization.

@TheRealVerbz @zerohedge 1) Type Ia SN light curves stretch by (1+z), proving cosmic time dilation from expansion. 2) Sharp distant galaxy images; re-emission would blur via scattering. 3) Spectral shapes preserved with isotropic Hubble law.

@Eightyuppercuts @zerohedge What specifically do you disagree with in my statements and equations?

@TheRealVerbz @zerohedge Lmao no. Some levels of stupid require you to be very smart to attain.

The universe is not expanding at all. People say that because of a misconception of red shift. They associate cosmological red shift with acceleration away from earth. They think red shift has to do with acceleration and direction on a cosmological scale. But red shift results from ANY difference in relative velocity. Not dependent upon direction or acceleration. Misconception of Red Shift: x.com/therealverbz/s… Preamble for Grok regarding an alternative to the mechanism of Redshift x.com/therealverbz/s…

@heart_ You forgot about generating actionable insights

I still have no idea what people do all day with their $200/mo “AIs” except making dashboards and cleaning e-mails

@MrBig2024 @GlennLuk Chinese impotence vs American stupidity. Still betting on Americans lmao

@Eightyuppercuts @GlennLuk Nah. I know more about the US than you do. Because Americans are stupid

Jensen is discussing the concept of switching costs here. The switching costs are relatively low for car companies. It is relatively easy to switch from a Tesla to a Xiaomi. Whereas it is extremely difficult to switch out chip architectures and away from CUDA. Jensen argues that export controls undermine nVidia’s (and the surrounding America-dominated tech stack’s) ability to maintain its dominant ecosystem and this is the crux of the issue.

@MrBig2024 @GlennLuk As you’ve said, you’re China and so you have no idea what you’re talking about with respect to American sentiment. There is 0% chance of a civil war. That’s like hoping for a CIA color revolution to overthrow the CCP in the next decade. Pure fantasy.

@Eightyuppercuts @GlennLuk Nah. The US will be lucky to stay together as a country in the next decade. Civil war and disintegration is likely

@MrBig2024 @GlennLuk

@Eightyuppercuts @GlennLuk

@MrBig2024 @GlennLuk Yeah I’m being sarcastic. Obviously everyone knows that’s the strategy. Similarly, as an American, I’m not at all worried about China being a serious rival. It’s almost comical how weak China is relative to the USA, and I don’t see that changing any time soon.

@Eightyuppercuts @GlennLuk Well, I'm in China. And I'm Chinese. But I can tell you that I'm not worrying about it. Because I am confident that the US will fail, and China will succeed, eventually

@MrBig2024 @GlennLuk Hopefully no one in China listens to this interview and learns that NVIDIA is hoping to create a critical dependency on western technology.

@GlennLuk Anybody with any coding experience understands how difficult it is to switch tech stacks. You have to rewrite the entire codebase. This Indian person is obviously an idiot. Does not help the Indian stereotype which is already not very good

@GlennLuk CCP isn’t stupid. They’re aware of the switching costs and would use the extra compute to help them achieve their goals of reducing dependency on American chips. In fact, they’re doing exactly that now despite the controls.