


Hieraky | 初心 🍵
1.2K posts

@Hieraky13
tòa tháp babel OG: @billions_ntwk






The Billion project appears to be farming its community: > Roles are heavily inflated > The testnet requires 100% personal information > There are up to 20 requirements just to become eligible > ICO funds are locked for 10 months and they plan to use the entire $5M as liquidity at TGE Everyone should be cautious with the @billions_ntwk project


This is Your last chance Billions Fam 🚨 Re-check your registration now. If your status shows correctly, you’re good to go ✅ If not, register ASAP — only 4 hours left! Steps: 1️⃣ Visit: community.billions.network 2️⃣ Connect your NFT wallet 3️⃣ Connect your Billions + Gmail 4️⃣ Connect X & Discord if you’re holding a role Once done, wait for the official announcement. ✅


i’ve read through the comments, and i understand where everyone is coming from firstly, this sucks. no platform wants to be in a position where terms are changed. there is nothing to gain from doing that, and i fully recognize how frustrating this may feel here is what happened: the billions team came to us in March that there's major exchange listing obstacle with 5.6% day 1 launchpad unlock and needed to revise the terms (with lockups) we explored several alternatives, but ultimately could not land on a solution that satisfied all parties with a viable path to launch while we don't agree with it in principle, the truth is, tge in the current environment is hard. at the time, polymarket implied only around a 40% probability of billions launching above the breakeven level of 100mn FDV, meaning the expected value of the launch was below the raise valuation (today, that number is around 80%) as a platform, the last thing we want is for users to lose money. so we pushed for a full refund option to be included to make users whole (option A) that said, i fully understand the frustration. nobody wants to see the structure they originally signed up for change. we will speak with the billions team again after all the feedback today. will be back with updates.



Mọi người đã quá quen với Dev sông Hằng Dev sông Hồng Nhưng ở một ngách bí ẩn nào đó Dev DaNang mới khét nhất.






Crypto đang quá minh bạch. Lý do dòng tiền tổ chức chưa tham gia sâu vào crypto chẳng liên quan gì đến quy định. Anh guột @cz_binance vừa chia sẻ trên sóng livetream 👇 Anh em hình dung thế này: Công ty trả lương nhân viên bằng crypto on-chain. Bất kỳ ai click vào ví công ty đều biết nhân viên nào nhận bao nhiêu. Đối thủ nhìn vào biết luôn doanh thu, supplier, đối tác. Trong TradFi, chuyện này không bao giờ xảy ra. Mọi giao dịch nằm trên "Private Ledger" của ngân hàng, chỉ những ai liên quan mới truy cập vào được. Crypto thì ngược lại. Public ledger = mọi thứ show ra hết. Vấn đề các tổ chức cần chính xác là cái mà crypto đang thiếu "Privacy" ➡️ Whale muốn mua $1B asset crypto mà cả thị trường thấy lệnh order trước khi fill xong thì kiểu gì cũng bị úp bô. ➡️ Quỹ không muốn portfolio bị track real-time bởi đối thủ. ➡️ JPMorgan vừa phát hành $50M commercial paper trên @solana nhưng team thừa nhận cần privacy layer mới scale mạnh được. Không "institution" nào chịu chơi kiểu đó đâu 😂 Trong TradFi, dark pool chiếm 30-50% volume giao dịch cổ phiếu Mỹ. Whale không trade trên sàn "lit" nếu có lựa chọn khác. Hiện tại Trọng chưa thấy có dự án nào build hạ tầng cho dark liquidity => cơ hội để tìm $HYPE v2. Nhưng ở tầng protocol thì có dự án @renegade_fi build dark pool on-chain đầu tiên trên @arbitrum + @base . Dùng MPC + ZK proof để ẩn order book hoàn toàn, 0 slippage, 0 front-run. Nhưng Trọng thấy em này thanh khoản còn mỏng lắm. Whale chưa dám dùng quy mô lớn nên anh em cứ add vào watchlist follow thêm nhé. Chờ dự án ra token rồi tính tiếp. Hoặc anh em vào test sản phẩm biết đâu mốt được airdrop to thì lại ngon luôn 😁 Tóm lại: CZ đã confirm một điều: privacy không phải "nice-to-have" nữa. Mà nó nên là "infrastructure layer" tiếp theo. Dự án nào giải được bài toán "private nhưng vẫn auditable" sẽ kèo rất thơm nếu chúng ta bắt được ở định giá thấp. Trọng sẽ deep dive thêm các protocol privacy đang build, và sẽ sớm lên bài phân tích về dự án Renegade. Anh em có biết dự án nào đang build dark pool on-chain thì comment cho Trọng biết với nhé. #CZ #Privacy



Paused hết rồi lấy gì mà còn động lực nữa Hay giờ lại quay về build vì đam mê thật thôi anh em?










💥 What makes a truly sustainable DeFi strategy? - DeFi has a pattern—and by now, it's become all too familiar. A new protocol launches with an attractive annual yield (APY). + Capital flows in. + Profits drop. + Liquidity dries up. Then the cycle repeats. This cycle has played out in countless DeFi strategies. - The surface indicators change, but the underlying behavior doesn't. And it raises an even more crucial question: “What is yielding the highest returns right now?”: 👉 Why do most strategies fail quickly—and what is truly sustainable? - The pattern behind short-term returns. + At the core of rapid cycles in DeFi is a simple dynamic: incentives attract capital faster than actual demand can sustain. + High APY is often designed to increase liquidity. They work—until they stop working. As more capital flows in, the returns decrease. As incentives diminish, the strategy loses its appeal and capital is withdrawn as quickly as it arrived. This isn't a drawback—just a phase. But it's not sustainability either. - The True Meaning of “Sustainability” A sustainable DeFi strategy isn't defined by peak performance. It's defined by “sustainability.” 👉In practical terms, that means a strategy should: + Generate “stable returns over time” + Avoid relying entirely on incentives or token issuance + Maintain operational capability in **volatile market conditions** This is the difference between chasing yields and building **risk-adjusted yields**. Sustainability isn't about what works this week—it's about what endures through cycles. - Real yields versus temporary yields. Not all yields are created equal. 👉Some yields come from "real economic activity": + Transaction fees + Lending demand + Arbitrage opportunities - Other yields come from "incentives": + Token issuance + Liquidity mining rewards 👉This distinction is crucial. Yields based on incentives are inherently temporary. They will decrease as emissions decrease or token prices fluctuate. In contrast, real yields are tied to actual usage—making them more stable over time. - This is where many DeFi strategies fail. They optimize for **annual yield (APY) in the press**, not for sustainability. - Liquidity, Demand, and Market Conditions Even powerful strategies are dependent on context. + Sustainability is shaped by: "Liquidity depth" (can the strategy scale without sacrificing returns?) "User activity" (is there real demand driving returns?) "Market volatility" (is the strategy dependent on specific conditions?) "Underlying demand" (why does this opportunity exist?) Some strategies only work in bull markets. Others rely on sudden volatility. A truly sustainable approach will adapt—it doesn't depend on a single scenario. - Hidden Costs of Returns A strategy might look great in theory—but still perform poorly in practice. Why? 👉Because real-world execution creates friction: * Slippage * Gas fees * Rebalancing costs * Changes in asset correlation Over time, these factors reduce profitability. 👉This is why sustainable profitability must be evaluated on a **net** basis, not just gross APY. Without accounting for costs and risks, performance is often exaggerated. - From Opportunity to System The next step in DeFi strategies is moving from individual opportunities to “integrated systems”. - Sustainable approaches typically include: * Diversification across multiple strategies * Continuous monitoring and reallocation * Adaptation to changing market conditions * Focus on **risk-adjusted yields**, not just maximum yields - This is where DeFi begins to resemble mature financial systems—less reactive, more structured. - How Concrete Vaults Approach Sustainability This is the philosophy behind “regulated DeFi” and platforms like Concrete. - Concrete DeFi funds are designed to: * Prioritize sustainable returns over short-term volatility * Flexible capital allocation across strategies * Adaptation to changing market conditions * Reduce reliance on temporary incentives Instead of pursuing the highest APY, the focus is on building '' sustainable on-chain capital deployment systems '' . - A practical example: Concrete DeFi USDT Let's take "Concrete DeFi USDT" as an example. + With yields up to ~8.5%, it may not compete with the most attractive short-term opportunities. But that's not the issue. What it offers is: * Stability * Consistency * Lower volatility 👉Over time, these characteristics may outweigh the higher returns—but not always. @ConcreteXYZ @crypttoji