IcemanAssets retweetet
IcemanAssets
12.2K posts

IcemanAssets
@IcemanAssets
Blockchain/Digital Asset Researcher/Collector & Gamer Proud member of the @WolvesDAO pack
Beigetreten Eylül 2020
678 Folgt3K Follower
IcemanAssets retweetet

@beyoncegarden @hvacguy Times ARE different, they’re much safer and kids are addicted to their phones.

English
IcemanAssets retweetet

🚨💉 “We welcome to launch of immunisation Agenda 2030”
“An ambitious strategy, where everyone in the world, everywhere, fully benefits from vaccines” ‼️
“We to ensure that no adult or child is left behind”
Wow - The Globalist Agenda or vaccinating every living person in the planet multiple times is back on the table….
English
IcemanAssets retweetet

How vulture funds plug directly into housing bonds
When the State issues housing bonds, it creates a predictable, State-backed cash environment. That environment is extremely attractive to vulture funds and large institutional investors, because:
• The debt is sovereign (backed by the people)
• The cash flow is guaranteed (tax + subsidies)
• The risk is socialised
• The return is private
Vulture funds don’t need to build communities or solve housing. They need:
• stable rent streams
• long time horizons
• State-guaranteed demand
• Bond-financed housing policy creates exactly that.
So what happens?
• Bonds raise capital in the people’s name
• Capital inflates land and property prices
• Funds buy housing stock at scale
• The State becomes the payer of last resort
At that point, the market is no longer a market - it’s a State-underwritten investment platform.
How rent subsidies lock the cycle permanently
This is the trap.
Instead of using public borrowing to build and retain public housing, the State does this:
1. Issues bonds (public debt)
2. Housing costs rise
3. Ordinary people can’t afford rents
4. The State introduces rent subsidies
5. Subsidies go directly to landlords / funds
6. Rents rise to absorb the subsidy
7. More subsidies are needed
This is not accidental. It is a closed financial loop.
Rent subsidies do not reduce rents.
They guarantee them.
They act as:
• Income insurance for landlords
• Yield stabilisers for funds
• Justification for continued borrowing
The tenant never escapes. The fund never loses. The debt never shrinks.
Why this makes the people pay three times
Under this system, the same person pays:
1. As a taxpayer - servicing housing bonds
2. As a renter - paying inflated market rent
3. As a beneficiary - receiving partial subsidy from their own liability
This is not welfare.
It is circular extraction.
The State takes money from the people, uses it to stabilise investor returns, then feeds a fraction back to the same people to survive the prices it created.
Why this violates housing as a right (not just policy)
Housing as a right means:
• access is primary, not conditional
• security of tenure is fundamental
• homes are not treated as financial instruments
• public resources prioritise use, not yield
Bond-plus-subsidy housing does the opposite:
• it treats housing as a rent-generating asset
• it replaces ownership and security with dependency
• it ties shelter to market participation
• it subordinates people to debt logic
That is a structural violation, not a bad outcome.
When the State knowingly adopts a model where:
• Public debt fuels private accumulation
• Shelter is rationed through rent support
• And scarcity is maintained to protect yields
it has abandoned housing as a right and replaced it with housing as a financial product.
The fiduciary breach made explicit
Under a fiduciary framework:
The State may borrow only to advance the people’s interests.
But here:
• The people carry the debt
• The funds capture the asset
• The State guarantees the rent
• And the public never owns the housing
That is textbook breach of trust.
The borrowing is public.
The benefit is private.
The risk is collective.
The control is external.
The unavoidable conclusion
This is not a housing shortage. It is not a capacity issue. It is not a planning failure.
It is financialised housing by design.
Housing bonds + vulture funds + rent subsidies create a system where:
• Homes are permanently scarce
• Rents are permanently high
• Public money permanently props the market
• And the people permanently pay

English

@thehealthb0t @iluminatibot Gates is just another soul selling pawn piece of shit 💩
English
IcemanAssets retweetet

@COSuhgnoa @Leoyourleader Says the Ukrainian gobshite 😂 fuck off
English

@AndySaxon78 @tracyohanlon74 We have different countries and cultures for a reason!
That c u n t shouldn’t even be in Ireland
English

This is wicked beyond belief!! An elderly lady with dementia, is left in a shopping centres restaurant while her "carer" goes shopping?
Luckily a mother with her children realised that the lady was left on her own, they decided to sit with this poor lady until her "carer" came back - 40 minutes later!
Her excuse, "she isn't my mother" wow just wow.
Say what you want about the traveller community but this is why they take care of our own 🙏
English

@RubiraPepe65142 @JasperZiggle I am pretty sure I am smarter than your whole family. We can prove it if you are willing to come on video and have a live conversation.
English

@WallStreetApes Maybe dont film where you shouldn't film then. If they say, stop filming, you stop filming!
English














