TameraLynn Stewart, #P3 & PWU
32.3K posts

TameraLynn Stewart, #P3 & PWU
@Impact2HEAL
Politically homeless lobbyist | Proud to regularly piss off the uniparty, corporations, & trad lobbyists | Exploring how seemingly opposing worlds can align





“Show me the incentive, and I’ll show you the outcome.” Can also be said: “Show me the intended good leading the incentive, and I’ll show you all the outcomes … including the ones no one wants to acknowledge or measure.” Unintended consequences aren’t usually accidents. They’re predictable effects that are: • under-measured • politically inconvenient • outside the scope of those advocating the policy Policy Integrity = 1. Define intended outcomes clearly 2. Identify likely secondary effects before implementation 3. Measure both equally 4. Include all affected groups 5. Adjust based on real data Most systems do #1 - that provides the positive PR and hype. And some maybe intend to include #5 (but do so poorly). But the reality remains, positive intentions don’t cancel negative outcomes. The harms stack up - often quietly - because the focus stays on celebrating good intentions. If we’re not tracking all outcomes (and conflicts of interest, but that’s another discussion), we’re not solving the problem. At some point, we have to ask ourselves, was the real goal ever to solve the problem?


Developers with build-to-rent projects under construction say lenders have stopped providing equity and debt financing while the bill awaits passage. One builder may lay off workers for the first time in 50 years. bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2…

“Show me the incentive, and I’ll show you the outcome.” Can also be said: “Show me the intended good leading the incentive, and I’ll show you all the outcomes … including the ones no one wants to acknowledge or measure.” Unintended consequences aren’t usually accidents. They’re predictable effects that are: • under-measured • politically inconvenient • outside the scope of those advocating the policy Policy Integrity = 1. Define intended outcomes clearly 2. Identify likely secondary effects before implementation 3. Measure both equally 4. Include all affected groups 5. Adjust based on real data Most systems do #1 - that provides the positive PR and hype. And some maybe intend to include #5 (but do so poorly). But the reality remains, positive intentions don’t cancel negative outcomes. The harms stack up - often quietly - because the focus stays on celebrating good intentions. If we’re not tracking all outcomes (and conflicts of interest, but that’s another discussion), we’re not solving the problem. At some point, we have to ask ourselves, was the real goal ever to solve the problem?




Trade group for discount carriers confirms seeking $2.5B in govt assistance “used exclusively to offset incremental fuel costs, as a necessary and targeted measure to stabilize operations and keep airfares affordable during this period of volatility.“










Here is my recommendation to @realDonaldTrump when he speaks to an alarmed Nation tonight: “I am exercising my constitutional power under Article II, Section 3 to convene both houses of Congress on ‘extraordinary Occasions.’ I have ordered them to convene tomorrow morning by 10 am. I will keep them in session using that same power until they fund ALL of DHS — without exception! And I will hear or brook no nonsense from the Senate — or the House for that matter — that they are already in session, just in a pro forma capacity. My convening power allows me to insist on a REAL, not a pro forma session. And I will send them right back into session if they try to adjourn in a pro forma capacity.”









