Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀

54.8K posts

Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 banner
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀

Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀

@ItsSadMatt

They/Them - if you're reading this to look for something to mock, I fucked your spouse and they loved it

London, England Beigetreten Nisan 2009
3.4K Folgt597 Follower
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
jezz
jezz@ABmrJutt·
40% of teen pregnancies in 15 y/o girls involve a fathering man who is 20-29. It is never lost on me that the conversations surrounding teen pregnancy are always about the promiscuity of teenage girls and not the violence of older men.
English
63
2K
10.8K
77.2K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
andy twelves
andy twelves@andytwelves·
Hi @GoodwinMJ - I’ve read your response in full. You haven’t explained why you or MattGPT has made up multiple quotes attributed to figures like Cicero, Hayek, Burnham, Scruton, and Walker Connor, and why they cannot be verified in any primary texts or reliable secondary sources. You haven’t addressed the specific claims about schools, e.g. the Bradford classroom example, the supposed BBC West Midlands report, or the Ofsted quote, all of which appear to be either untraceable or misrepresented. Simply citing general EAL statistics doesn’t validate your specific anecdotal claims that don’t exist. You also haven’t engaged with the core issue around EAL itself. “English as an Additional Language” does not mean pupils cannot speak English or are unable to learn, and all the Ofsted reports of the schools you vaguely referenced consistently show strong progress by Year 6. Presenting this as evidence of systemic breakdown is objectively misleading and wrong. On migration figures, polling, and even basic political facts (e.g. Boris being in opposition in 2019), there are clear falsehoods that you haven’t corrected or clarified. I'd be really keen to have this discussion live with you, either on your show on @GBNEWS, the @PoliticsJOE_UK podcast, or a third broadcaster - or are you too afraid to have an open debate? Your response is embarrassing.
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ

A response to my critics. Suicide of a Nation is clearly becoming a major book & I'm DELIGHTED by the debate it's sparked. This is why I wrote it. People deserve to know the truth about what is happening in their own country. I also find myself in the curious position of watching Suicide of a Nation be criticised by people on both the Left, many of whom have clearly not read it, & people further to my Right, who oppose my support for Reform. I will deal with all this together. 1. Research, stats & evidence All the research, stats, data come from the official 2021 UK census data. The projections are calibrated to the 2022 Office for National Statistics national population projections, ensuring consistency with national trends. I believe this is the most systematic, sophisticated look at the demographic revolution unfolding in Britain that we have to date. To be clear, Suicide of a Nation is also a trade book, intended for a mass audience. It is not like books written by academics that are typically only read by a few dozen or a few hundred people. It is designed to reach tens of thousands, which it is now doing, to try and help shift the Overton Window. If you want all the detailed assumptions, analysis, & modelling behind the book you can read them here: shorturl.at/d3Hg8 Or if you want to look at the key trends in more detail you can see them in our Substack this morning: shorturl.at/LLBeS 2. Substack, links, and footnotes Trade books by their nature have minimal footnotes. The aim is to inspire a mass readership. Having spent 20 years in the universities, I wanted to write a trade book. Hence the lack of footnotes. If you want the data detail on the trends see the paper above. I do link to several of my Substack articles because, as it happens, with the exception of David Coleman, I am one of the only people who has run demographic projections at this level. You can read it here: shorturl.at/Gij6S. Ditto my discussion in the book of Muslim attitudes, Reform voters, and the economic costs of net migration. Nobody else is writing about these issues as we are at mattgoodwin.org hence me citing those pieces. I see no problem with this. I am proud of our work. Academics cite their own work all the time. It just so happens this time around they disagree with my work! 3. AI school census data Footnote 8 includes a reference to school and nursery data via AI which was then cross-checked with the real dataset (available here: shorturl.at/KlFVm. I see no issue obtaining datasets via AI so long as they are cross-checked with the original source (above). Hence why I include the reference. This school census data shows, clearly, nearly 1 in 4 primary pupils & nearly 1 in 3 nursery pupils no longer speak English as their main language. I attach the screenshot. In Bradford, the example, nearly 40% of state primary children do not speak English as their main language (see screenshot). In some primary schools in Bradford, 98% of pupils speak 'English as an additional language'. Nationally, as I talk about in the book, and as GB News revealed last year, there are now 2,000 schools where English is no longer the main language for most pupils In 2 primary schools, not a single child has English as their native tongue. In 107 schools, 9 in 10 pupils do not speak English at home. In 2,309 schools in England, English is no longer the first language. And across the country, 1.8 million children, 1 in 5, do not speak English as their main language (see here shorturl.at/KXROf) It is also now fact, as I say in the book, to have schools in the Midlands with more than 30 languages spoken: shorturl.at/OfyNj I notice my critics ignore all these statistics, as well as the obvious problems this creates in the classroom, for example -> shorturl.at/6TJYz The left-wing claim that this does not create problems is ludicrous. Research by scholars such as Strand and Hessel finds that pupils who speak English as an additional (not main) language explains 22% of the variation in their educational achievement, compared to 3-4% that is statistically explained by things like gender or free school meals (as a measure of poverty). So, unlike the Left, I think this is a major problem and I make no apology for saying so. We should have a shared language. Bilingualism undermines our shared culture & nation. Mass immigration is weakening our educational system. 4. Solutions and prognosis Some argue the book offers no solution. I disagree. I am clear throughout. End mass migration. Exit the ECHR. Repeal the HRA. End welfare & social housing subsidies for non-Brits. End two-tier multiculturalism. Crack down on Islamism. Invest in Pro-family policies. Deport illegal migrants, foreign criminals & those who do not make a net fiscal contribution to the UK economy. Reassert our free speech. Scrap definitions of 'Islamophobia'. Abolish non-crime hate incidents. Where I depart from critics further to my Right is in opposing vague and ill-defined talk about "mass deportations" or "remigration", which often appear to mean "deport anybody who isn't White", or "deport British nationals". I reject this - politically, morally, ethically. I simply do not think it is right, possible, politically appealing to an election-winning majority, or in tune with our political culture. I also do not think the Americans cheering on other parties understand the nuances in our political culture. 5. Intellectual lineage. The book implicitly nods, throughout, to the work of Roger Scruton, Eric Kaufmann, Anthony Smith, Walker Connor, Douglas Murray (subtitle), all of whom have warned through speeches, podcasts, e-mails, and articles about the loss of a historic majority group. This is deliberate. Left-wingers who argue, for example, that Smith or Connor did not warn about the loss of a historic core are simply not reading their work, or being disingenuous. The title of the book is a specific nod to Arthur Koestler's Suicide of a Nation, a left-wing account of Britain's decline in the postwar era. My book, in contrast, is obviously a national conservative/right-wing take on Britain's decline. Sometimes, you don't need to state your influences because they are so obvious - at least to people who read books. 6. Publishing in 2026 Some people have asked why I did not publish with a mainstream publisher given my past books were with Penguin, Oxford, Cambridge, Routledge, etc., and I wrote two Sunday Times bestsellers (now three?) The answer is because I believe the publishers have been ideologically captured and no longer allow genuine free speech and debate. Having gone through mainstream publishers, I know for a fact this book would never have been published or would have been edited and diluted to the point at which it says nothing interesting or truthful at all. Anybody who is a serious author, who has gone through the editorial process, knows this to be true. The reality, in 2026, is if you have a profile and a large Substack you no longer need mainstream publishers. You no longer need to be controlled by Gatekeepers. This is a positive development. And in many respects I hope that given it's obvious success (top 5 on Amazon) Suicide of a Nation will encourage others to break with establishment publishing. This is what we need to do if we are serious about taking on the institutions. Lastly, my thanks to the left-wing trolls and resentful, bitter, unsuccessful former academic colleagues who are coordinating an attack on the Amazon Reviews page. They are helping drive the algorithm, ensuring this book receives the attention it deserves and is read by many, many more people. I thank you for this. Best wishes, Matt p.s. buy the book below or via Waterstones, Blackwell's, Foyles, etc (Amazon is now regularly running out such is the demand) amazon.co.uk/Suicide-Nation…

English
27
180
826
49.7K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
gino
gino@bodycrave·
now which gay intern did this
gino tweet mediagino tweet media
English
21
762
20.6K
358.1K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
Daily Raw Clips
Daily Raw Clips@Dailyrawclips·
A pervert Dude saw a woman alone and wanted to assault her i guess he learned his lesson the hard way on the street #Fights
English
84
182
2.2K
28.7K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀
Like, let's be real, there were probably other artists/celebs/rich people around as well, and kids can be little shits some times I'm not saying the kid deserves berating but hey, maybe your child who is comfortable around celebs was acting in a way some celebs didn't like?
English
0
0
0
5
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
pilep
pilep@pmjamilla·
It’s becoming clear that this entire Chappell Roan “controversy” is literally just rich celebrity parents whining online because they didn’t get their way, and now they won’t stop until their entitled asses get a VIP pass ijbol a rich kid cried and now we won’t hear the end if it
Pop Crave@PopCrave

Catherine Harding, the mother of the 11-year-old girl who was confronted by Chappell Roan’s security guard, shares her side of the story.

English
85
1.6K
16.9K
251.8K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets·
Can you imagine if a brown or black woman asked for a predominantly white city be bombed? This is utterly disgusting.
Narinder Kaur tweet media
English
1.4K
1.4K
7.3K
198K
Pop Base
Pop Base@PopBase·
Mayor of Rio de Janeiro, Eduardo Cavaliere, says Chappell Roan will never perform at their annual ‘Todo Mundo no Rio’ event held in Copacabana Beach “as long as he’s in charge of the city” following Jorginho’s claims about how her security guard treated his daughter. He also invited Jorginho’s daughter to see this year’s headliner, Shakira. Jorginho responded: “♥️♥️”
Pop Base tweet mediaPop Base tweet media
English
1.5K
6.1K
132.7K
15.9M
larissa
larissa@laridevil·
@lovelanguagc @PopBase Vdd, uma criança de 11 anos só foi humilhada publicamente a ponto de chorar e ficar extremamente constrangida. Mas tudo bem, né? Afinal ela é rica e os pais podem gastar dinheiro com psicológo.
Português
1
0
14
633
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀 retweetet
The Protagonist
The Protagonist@protagonist_xig·
THEY. TORTURED. A. ONE. YEAR. OLD. BABY. THEY. TORTURED. A. ONE. YEAR. OLD. BABY. THEY. TORTURED. A. ONE. YEAR. OLD. BABY. THEY. TORTURED. A. ONE. YEAR. OLD. BABY.
TRT World@trtworld

Israeli soldiers torture a one-year-old child in Gaza, including burning his leg with a cigarette and inserting a nail into his leg, according to a report, to pressure his father to make confessions trtworld.com/article/346872…

English
625
47.5K
171K
2.2M
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀
@_JessicaDavies I don't know what's happened but I've seen Roan's response and a lot of people seem so happy to jump to her being entitled and terrible but even if everything was exactly as told, she's not that bad
English
0
0
0
24
Jess Davies
Jess Davies@_JessicaDavies·
The way people are holding Chappell Roan to a higher standard than the famous men who literally abuse women & little girls???
CONSEQUENCE@consequence

Catherine Harding, the mother of the girl who was allegedly berated by a security guard after sneaking a peak at Chappell Roan during breakfast at a São Paulo hotel, has now shared her side of the incident. "I know that Chappell has responded saying that it wasn't her security and that she didn't do it. So, 100%, this security guard was not a security guard of the hotel. That's what I can say. He looks after artists. I don't know if it was her personal security guard, but he was with her. So that's all I know. "Did she send him to do it? Again, I don't know. Look, I would like to hope not, but at the same time, I think that you have a responsibility when you are a celebrity to make sure, I guess, that the people that work for you and that act on your behalf are acting on your behalf. So, would he do that if he didn't have her authority to do so? I don't know if he does; then obviously that's a big problem because then he's representing her in a way that she doesn't want to be represented. So I think that's really important for her to notice and realize that's not correct... "Literally, we were staying in the same hotel. we were at breakfast. And we noticed a girl walk past with long red hair, very curly. And I said to my daughter, 'Oh, do you think that's Chappell Roan?' and she looked and she said, 'Oh my God, Mum, do you think it's her?' And so she said, 'I'm gonna go and have a look outside,' and she was sat just outside in the garden area which we were also free to go into; the door was open. "And so I went back to the table to sit and eat, and my daughter walked through the door. She didn't have her phone, she didn't try to take a picture, she didn't approach her. She literally didn't do anything; she just looked at her and smiled, and she came back and she actually said to me, 'Mum, I don't know if it's her.' Because obviously she looks like—you know, with her costumes and everything—she looks a little bit different. So my daughter said, 'Oh my gosh, I'm not—I'm not sure if it was her. I think it was her, Mum. It really, really looks like her, but I don't know; maybe it's her sister.' She said, 'Maybe it's her sister,' and I said, 'Oh, I don't know, darling,' and that was it. We continued our breakfast. "From that, then came the security guard who, as I said—as my husband said—had a very aggressive tone. And I feel like was—if she did not send him... I mean, even if she did send him or she didn't send him, I don't know. For me, I feel like it really overstepped a boundary because he is quite an intimidating—he is very large. So for him to come over to a table with just a woman and her daughter eating breakfast to kind of like berate and scold us and say that he was going to complain, and tell me that I should be teaching my daughter to be better and that she's badly educated and we should respect people's privacy and we should not harass people and all of these other things. "And I did try and explain to him the situation—that she's a child and she was just very excited to see an artist and singer that she admires—and can he not understand that was all she was doing? I explained to him also that my husband is also very well-known and that we're very—she's very used to being around people that are well-known and she would never cross someone's boundaries or overstep a mark. She very much knows the limits; not to ever, you know, be rude or make anyone feel... she understands; she understands very well. "And I tried to explain this to him, and then he just kept saying, 'Well, if you—if—if that's the case, then you should know better. You should know how it is. You should know how it is, so you should teach your—you should teach her to be better. You shouldn't allow her to be like this.' And I was—I was shocked. And I did actually say to him at the time, I said, 'Well, if this is the case that she doesn't even want people to look at her, she is very welcome to eat breakfast in her room because this here is a public area and I am a paying guest as well as her. So if I want to walk past someone's table and look at them, I have every right to do so. I am not approaching her. I'm not doing anything to make her feel intimidated or nothing—like this 11-year-old child.' ... "We came all the way to Sao Paulo to watch the show. It was my daughter's birthday present; she actually asked for tickets to come for her birthday present, which is a little bit ruined because we didn't go to the show last night, but it's how it is. But yeah. Anyways, it's how it is. We'll say no more on it. That's it. I hope that maybe if it wasn't her that she learns to not allow the people that work for her to treat people like this." 📸: Getty Images

English
2
1
11
2.5K
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀
Look, I'm not saying that the rich, celebrity parents of a child would potentially raise a spoiled brat, but kids can be spoiled sometimes and maybe, just maybe, this is all being blown out of proportion
CONSEQUENCE@consequence

Catherine Harding, the mother of the girl who was allegedly berated by a security guard after sneaking a peak at Chappell Roan during breakfast at a São Paulo hotel, has now shared her side of the incident. "I know that Chappell has responded saying that it wasn't her security and that she didn't do it. So, 100%, this security guard was not a security guard of the hotel. That's what I can say. He looks after artists. I don't know if it was her personal security guard, but he was with her. So that's all I know. "Did she send him to do it? Again, I don't know. Look, I would like to hope not, but at the same time, I think that you have a responsibility when you are a celebrity to make sure, I guess, that the people that work for you and that act on your behalf are acting on your behalf. So, would he do that if he didn't have her authority to do so? I don't know if he does; then obviously that's a big problem because then he's representing her in a way that she doesn't want to be represented. So I think that's really important for her to notice and realize that's not correct... "Literally, we were staying in the same hotel. we were at breakfast. And we noticed a girl walk past with long red hair, very curly. And I said to my daughter, 'Oh, do you think that's Chappell Roan?' and she looked and she said, 'Oh my God, Mum, do you think it's her?' And so she said, 'I'm gonna go and have a look outside,' and she was sat just outside in the garden area which we were also free to go into; the door was open. "And so I went back to the table to sit and eat, and my daughter walked through the door. She didn't have her phone, she didn't try to take a picture, she didn't approach her. She literally didn't do anything; she just looked at her and smiled, and she came back and she actually said to me, 'Mum, I don't know if it's her.' Because obviously she looks like—you know, with her costumes and everything—she looks a little bit different. So my daughter said, 'Oh my gosh, I'm not—I'm not sure if it was her. I think it was her, Mum. It really, really looks like her, but I don't know; maybe it's her sister.' She said, 'Maybe it's her sister,' and I said, 'Oh, I don't know, darling,' and that was it. We continued our breakfast. "From that, then came the security guard who, as I said—as my husband said—had a very aggressive tone. And I feel like was—if she did not send him... I mean, even if she did send him or she didn't send him, I don't know. For me, I feel like it really overstepped a boundary because he is quite an intimidating—he is very large. So for him to come over to a table with just a woman and her daughter eating breakfast to kind of like berate and scold us and say that he was going to complain, and tell me that I should be teaching my daughter to be better and that she's badly educated and we should respect people's privacy and we should not harass people and all of these other things. "And I did try and explain to him the situation—that she's a child and she was just very excited to see an artist and singer that she admires—and can he not understand that was all she was doing? I explained to him also that my husband is also very well-known and that we're very—she's very used to being around people that are well-known and she would never cross someone's boundaries or overstep a mark. She very much knows the limits; not to ever, you know, be rude or make anyone feel... she understands; she understands very well. "And I tried to explain this to him, and then he just kept saying, 'Well, if you—if—if that's the case, then you should know better. You should know how it is. You should know how it is, so you should teach your—you should teach her to be better. You shouldn't allow her to be like this.' And I was—I was shocked. And I did actually say to him at the time, I said, 'Well, if this is the case that she doesn't even want people to look at her, she is very welcome to eat breakfast in her room because this here is a public area and I am a paying guest as well as her. So if I want to walk past someone's table and look at them, I have every right to do so. I am not approaching her. I'm not doing anything to make her feel intimidated or nothing—like this 11-year-old child.' ... "We came all the way to Sao Paulo to watch the show. It was my daughter's birthday present; she actually asked for tickets to come for her birthday present, which is a little bit ruined because we didn't go to the show last night, but it's how it is. But yeah. Anyways, it's how it is. We'll say no more on it. That's it. I hope that maybe if it wasn't her that she learns to not allow the people that work for her to treat people like this." 📸: Getty Images

English
0
0
0
7
Biblically Accurate Sadmatt 🐀
@neverseeen17 @yasminesummanx Can you tell me how in the hell you get she's a horrible person from this situation? As far as I can tell, a security guard acting on his own initiative, was a bit rude to some kid in a fancy hotel and now we must all hate someone who didn't know about it?
English
0
0
0
43
the last real champion
the last real champion@neverseeen17·
@yasminesummanx using “the i get to be a horrible person because someone else is” excuse is soo 2000s you are talking about 2 separate issues does misogyny exist? yes is chappell a terrible person also yes stop deflecting
English
2
3
40
4.2K
★ yas ★
★ yas ★@yasminesummanx·
If you’re a female celebrity and you’re slightly rude, you get burnt at the stake. If you’re a male celebrity and you beat women, you’ll sell out stadiums and still have huge brand deals waiting for you.
English
43
5.9K
34.5K
240.3K