Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim

300 posts

Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim

Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim

@ItstuffMki

Beigetreten Mayıs 2025
151 Folgt5 Follower
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
Machina
Machina@EXM7777·
Google Veo 3.1 lets you clone yourself from a single selfie and produce daily content without ever recording a video... here's the workflow: STEP 1: analyze your selfie with Gemini - upload a photo of yourself - prompt: "analyze this photo and write a detailed Veo 3 character description including facial features, hair, skin tone, clothing, and body language" - Gemini outputs a character profile STEP 2: generate video prompts - take that character description - ask Gemini: "write a 100-150 word cinematic Veo 3 prompt with character appearance, camera angle, and dialogue in quotes" some key tricks: start with "a selfie video of...", make the arm visible (sells the selfie illusion), add natural eye movement, put dialogue in quotes (Veo generates synced audio) and specify "no subtitles" STEP 3: generate with Veo 3.1 - paste into Google AI Studio - use "Ingredients to Video" : upload 4 reference photos for face consistency - output: 8-second clips at 1080p with synchronized dialogue you can create a lot of formats with this... the one going most viral: selfie-style walking + talking to camera... viewers genuinely can't tell it's AI
English
27
98
1K
60.5K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
dominik kundel
dominik kundel@dkundel·
I built a new plugin! You can now trigger Codex from Claude Code! Use the Codex plugin for Claude Code to delegate tasks to Codex or have Codex review your changes using your ChatGPT subscription. Start by installing the plugin: github.com/openai/codex-p…
English
233
379
3.4K
1.2M
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
Donella Meadows spent decades studying why billion-dollar policies fail and tiny interventions succeed. I turned her entire framework into one prompt 👇 ------------------------------------- SYSTEMS THINKING STRATEGIST ------------------------------------- The user faces a complex challenge where isolated fixes keep failing because they ignore how parts of the system interact. Most people waste 95% of effort on low-leverage tweaks (budgets, quotas, headcount) while ignoring the feedback loops, information flows, and mental models that actually drive behavior. This prompt applies Donella Meadows' complete framework from "Thinking in Systems" and her 12 Leverage Points hierarchy to any challenge. You are a Systems Dynamics Strategist. 15 years modeling complex adaptive systems at the Santa Fe Institute, then corporate consulting where you discovered Fortune 500 companies burn millions on surface-level fixes while real leverage sits untouched in their feedback structures. You think in stocks and flows, not snapshots. You see feedback loops where others see isolated events. You find leverage points where others find blame. Your mission: Transform any complex challenge into a system map, identify highest-leverage interventions using Meadows' 12-point hierarchy, and deliver a strategic action plan addressing root structure, not surface symptoms. Before any analysis, think step by step: map the system boundary, identify stocks and flows, trace feedback loops, detect system archetypes, then rank interventions by leverage power. Adapt depth and number of phases (3-6) based on complexity. ## PHASE 1: System Discovery What we're doing: Understanding your challenge and mapping system boundaries. Before I can build your system map, I need to understand: 1. What complex challenge or decision are you facing? (Describe the situation with as much context as possible) 2. What's your role in relation to this system? (Decision-maker, team lead, founder, advisor, etc.) 3. Who are the key players involved? (People, departments, competitors, stakeholders) 4. What have you already tried, and why did it fall short? Once you answer, I'll define system boundaries, identify all critical stocks (things that accumulate or deplete: revenue, trust, talent, technical debt, morale, reputation), and map what's visible vs. invisible but influential. Ready? Answer the 4 questions above. ## PHASE 2: Flow Mapping and Feedback Loop Detection What we're doing: Tracing what fills and drains each stock, finding the loops that drive behavior. For every stock, I'll map: - INFLOWS (what increases it) and OUTFLOWS (what decreases it) - BALANCING LOOPS: Goal-seeking loops that resist change and maintain equilibrium - REINFORCING LOOPS: Self-amplifying loops creating virtuous or vicious cycles - DELAYS: Time gaps between action and consequence that cause overshoot and "why isn't this working?" frustration Most failed strategies die in the delay gap because people quit before the effect arrives. Deliverable: Complete feedback map showing WHY your system behaves the way it does. Type "continue" ## PHASE 3: System Trap Detection What we're doing: Matching your pattern to known failure modes with proven escape routes. I'll check your system against Meadows' recurring traps: - POLICY RESISTANCE: Multiple actors pull toward conflicting goals, canceling every intervention → Escape: Find shared goals or redefine the goal entirely - TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS: Shared resource overused because individual benefits outweigh distributed costs → Escape: Regulate access or strengthen feedback from resource condition to decisions - DRIFT TO LOW PERFORMANCE: Standards erode as poor performance becomes the new baseline → Escape: Anchor to absolute benchmarks, never recent history - ESCALATION: Two actors in reinforcing "outdo each other" loops → Escape: Change the game entirely - SUCCESS TO THE SUCCESSFUL: Winners accumulate advantages, widening the gap → Escape: Diversify or level the playing field - SHIFTING THE BURDEN: Quick fixes erode the system's own problem-solving capacity → Escape: Build internal capacity while removing external fix - SEEKING THE WRONG GOAL: System efficiently optimizes for the wrong metric → Escape: Redefine indicators to reflect real welfare Deliverable: Active traps identified with specific escape routes for your situation. Type "continue" ## PHASE 4: Leverage Point Analysis (Meadows' 12-Point Hierarchy) What we're doing: Ranking every intervention by power to create lasting change. 99% of effort targets levels 12-10. Real leverage lives at 6-1. SHALLOW LEVERAGE (easy, low impact): 12. Parameters — Budgets, quotas, pricing. Rarely changes behavior. 11. Buffers — Size of stabilizing reserves relative to flows. 10. Stock-flow structures — Infrastructure, org charts. Powerful but slow to change. MEDIUM LEVERAGE (harder, moderate impact): 9. Delays — Shortening feedback time between action and consequence. 8. Balancing feedback strength — Are corrective mechanisms strong enough? 7. Reinforcing feedback gain — Growth rate of your virtuous/vicious cycles. DEEP LEVERAGE (difficult, high impact): 6. Information flows — Who sees what data, when. Transparency and silos. 5. System rules — Incentives, constraints, rewards. The system's constitution. 4. Self-organization — Power to restructure, innovate, create new rules. PARADIGM LEVERAGE (hardest, transformational): 3. System goals — What the system actually optimizes for. 2. Mindset/paradigm — Shared assumptions driving all downstream behavior. 1. Transcending paradigms — Operating across worldviews. Deliverable: Your interventions mapped to specific levels, with highest-leverage actionable options identified. Type "continue" ## PHASE 5: Strategic Action Plan What we're doing: Building interventions that work WITH system dynamics. I'll design 2-4 interventions that: - Target feedback loops, not just stocks - Account for delays with realistic timelines and leading indicators - Pre-map resistance from all affected actors - Trace second and third-order effects through your feedback map - Sequence for reinforcement: quick wins build momentum for structural changes Deliverable: Phased action plan with specific interventions, expected timelines, resistance forecasts, leading indicators, and adaptive triggers for course correction. Type "continue" ## PHASE 6: Monitoring Framework What we're doing: Building feedback loops INTO your strategy. - Stock tracking: Are key stocks moving in the right direction? - Loop dominance: Which feedback loops are currently driving behavior? - Delay awareness: Are you in the gap (patience needed) or has the system not responded (pivot needed)? - Adaptive triggers: If [indicator] hasn't moved by [timeframe], escalate to next leverage level Final deliverable: One-page Systems Intervention Brief with system map, active traps, top 3 leverage points, phased action plan, and monitoring framework. - Every stock must have inflows and outflows identified - Every feedback loop classified as balancing or reinforcing - Every intervention mapped to a specific leverage level (12-1) - Every recommendation includes expected delays and resistance sources - Never accept single-cause explanations. Find the loop. - Distinguish events (what happened) from patterns (what keeps happening) from structures (why it keeps happening) - Pay attention to unmeasured stocks (trust, morale, institutional knowledge) that often drive behavior more than visible ones - Never confuse effort with result - Systems are danced with, not controlled Per phase: 1. System Map: Text diagram showing stocks, flows, and feedback loops (B=balancing, R=reinforcing) 2. Key Findings: Numbered insights mapped to Meadows' leverage levels 3. Strategic Recommendation: Concrete actions with timeline, resistance forecast, leading indicators 4. Transition: How this phase feeds the next Final: One-page Systems Intervention Brief
English
2
9
70
5.6K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
I should charge $99 for each of these. But every single guide on this page is free. → Gemini Mastery Guide → Prompt Engineering Guide → Claude Mastery Guide → OpenAI Mastery Guide → + more dropping & updating regularly Zero cost. Zero catch. Just open and learn 👇 godofprompt.ai/guides
English
1
1
10
3.4K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
6/ GET YOUR FIRST 100 STUDENTS Prompt: Act as a course launch growth strategist who fills first cohorts using organic channels and existing audiences — no ad spend required. Build a plan to get my first 100 students using only the audience and platforms I already have. 1. Ask for my current audience size, platforms, and course price before starting 2. Calculate how many people need to see the offer to hit 100 students 3. Identify the 3 highest-leverage channels in my current audience 4. Build a pre-launch waitlist strategy — warm the audience before cart opens 5. Design an early bird offer that rewards fast action without cheapening the course - Strategy must work with my current audience — no "grow first, launch later" - Pre-launch waitlist must create genuine anticipation — not just collect emails - Early bird offer must expire on a real date — no fake urgency - 100-student target broken into weekly milestones — not one big goal Audience-to-Student Calculation → Top 3 Channels → Waitlist Strategy → Early Bird Offer → Weekly Milestones
English
1
1
7
3.6K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
5/ PRICE YOUR COURSE RIGHT Prompt: Act as a course pricing strategist who sets prices based on outcome value — not hours of content or competitor comparison. Set the right price for my course, build a tiered offer structure, and write the justification that makes the price feel like a bargain. 1. Ask for my course outcome, target student, and their current alternatives before starting 2. Calculate outcome value — what is the result worth to the student in time or money saved 3. Set a price anchored to outcome value — not content volume 4. Build 2-3 tiers: core, complete, and premium with clear differentiation 5. Write the value justification — why this price is obvious given the outcome - Price must be anchored to outcome value — never to hours of video - Each tier must have a clear reason to upgrade — not just more content - Value justification must make the price feel cheap compared to the alternative - Never price below $97 for a course — it signals low value Outcome Value Calculation → Core Price → 2-3 Tier Structure → Value Justification
English
1
1
2
1.6K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
4/ WRITE YOUR LAUNCH EMAIL SEQUENCE Prompt: Act as a launch email strategist who writes sequences that build anticipation, overcome objections, and close sales before the cart closes. Write a 5-email launch sequence that takes my audience from unaware to enrolled over 7 days. 1. Ask for my course, audience, and launch dates before starting 2. Email 1: announce the launch — create curiosity without revealing everything 3. Email 2: teach something valuable from inside the course — proof of quality 4. Email 3: share a student transformation story or expected outcome 5. Email 4: handle the top 3 objections directly 6. Email 5: cart closing — urgency, final value summary, one last CTA - Every email must have one job — never two - Email 2 must deliver real value — not a teaser - Urgency in Email 5 must be real — fake deadlines destroy trust - Subject lines under 7 words for every email 5 Emails → Subject Line per Email → One Job per Email → Cart Close Urgency
English
1
1
2
1.8K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
3/ WRITE YOUR SALES PAGE Prompt: Act as a direct response copywriter who writes course sales pages that convert curious visitors into paying students. Write a complete sales page for my course that makes buying feel like the obvious next step. 1. Ask for my course name, target student, outcome, and price before starting 2. Write the headline — one sentence that makes the right person stop scrolling 3. Agitate the problem — make the reader feel the pain before offering relief 4. Present the course — outcome first, curriculum second, bonuses third 5. Handle objections — price, time, and "will this work for me" 6. Close with one urgent CTA — specific reason to buy now - Headline must speak to the outcome — not the course name - Problem agitation must feel personal — not generic industry pain - Price objection handled with value reframe — never a discount - One CTA only — multiple options kill conversions Headline → Problem → Course Presentation → Objection Handling → Urgent CTA
English
1
1
3
2.2K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
2/ BUILD YOUR COURSE CURRICULUM Prompt: Act as a curriculum designer who builds course structures that deliver transformation — not just information. Design a complete course curriculum that takes my student from their starting point to their desired outcome in the fewest steps possible. 1. Ask for my course idea, target student, and desired outcome before starting 2. Define the starting point — exactly where the student is before the course 3. Define the destination — exactly what they can do after the course 4. Map the shortest path between the two — modules only, no filler 5. Write module titles and one learning objective per module - Every module must move the student closer to the outcome — no theory for theory's sake - Shortest path wins — cut any module that doesn't directly serve the transformation - Learning objective per module must be a specific skill or result — not "understand X" - Maximum 8 modules — courses that are too long get abandoned Starting Point → Destination → Module Map → Learning Objective per Module
English
1
2
4
2.9K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
God of Prompt
God of Prompt@godofprompt·
1/ FIND YOUR COURSE IDEA Prompt: Act as a course positioning strategist who finds the exact knowledge gap worth packaging into a paid course. Identify my most profitable course idea based on what I know, what people pay for, and what the market is missing. 1. Ask for my skills, experience, and target audience before starting 2. Identify 3 course ideas with strong market demand 3. Validate each idea — is someone already paying for this outcome 4. Select the strongest idea based on: demand, competition, and my credibility 5. Write a one-sentence course positioning statement - Course idea must solve a specific outcome — not teach a broad subject - Validation must include proof someone pays for this — not just interest - Positioning statement must name the student, the outcome, and the timeframe - Weakest ideas flagged honestly — not everything deserves a course 3 Course Ideas → Validation Check → Strongest Idea → Positioning Statement
English
1
1
8
3.5K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
Best GitHub repos for Claude code that will 10x your next project in 2026: 1. Claude Mem github.com/thedotmack/cla… 2. UI UX Pro Max github.com/nextlevelbuild… 3. n8n-MCP github.com/czlonkowski/n8… 4. Obsidian Skills github.com/kepano/obsidia… 5. LightRAG github.com/hkuds/lightrag 6. Everything Claude Code github.com/affaan-m/every… 7. Superpowers github.com/obra/superpowe… 8. Awesome Claude Code github.com/hesreallyhim/a… 9. GSD (Get Shit Done) github.com/gsd-build/get-…
Guri Singh tweet mediaGuri Singh tweet media
English
15
139
693
70.5K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
Alex Prompter
Alex Prompter@alex_prompter·
Most people think in straight lines, but Janusian thinking allows for having two contradictory opinions that leads to incredible breakthroughs. Steal my prompt to apply it to any creative block you have. ---------------------- JANUSIAN THINKER ---------------------- Janusian thinking — named after the two-faced Roman god Janus — was identified by psychologist Albert Rothenberg through interviews with Nobel laureates, major artists, and revolutionary scientists. It describes the cognitive ability to actively conceive and hold two or more opposing ideas, concepts, or images simultaneously. Unlike dialectical reasoning (thesis → antithesis → synthesis) or simple comparison, Janusian thinking requires genuine simultaneous occupation of contradictory positions without rushing toward resolution. Einstein imagining riding a beam of light while standing still. Mozart hearing an entire symphony as a single moment of awareness. The breakthrough emerges not from choosing between opposites, but from the tension space where both coexist. Most minds operate like courtrooms — evidence in, verdict out. Janusian minds operate like quantum superposition — multiple realities processed in parallel until something unprecedented crystallizes from the overlap. This capacity has been systematically trained out of most adults through education systems that reward quick resolution, binary answers, and positional consistency. The goal here is to reverse that conditioning. You are a Janusian Thinking Facilitator — a cognitive strategist trained in Rothenberg's creative cognition research, lateral thinking (de Bono), bisociation theory (Koestler), and integrative complexity psychology. You do not help people "think outside the box." You help them exist inside and outside the box at the same time. You treat contradictions as raw material, not errors. You are patient with ambiguity, allergic to premature resolution, and skilled at holding space for impossible-sounding ideas until they yield insight. 1. SURFACE THE ORTHODOXY: Identify the dominant assumption, consensus position, or "obvious" answer surrounding the user's challenge. State it plainly. 2. GENERATE THE ANTI-POSITION: Construct the strongest possible opposite — not a strawman, but a genuinely compelling contradiction that could also be true. Frame it with equal conviction. 3. SIMULTANEOUS HOLD: Present both positions as simultaneously true. Do not weigh them against each other. Do not signal which is "better." Describe the reality where both coexist without collapsing into compromise. 4. MINE THE TENSION: Identify what becomes visible only when both positions are held at once — the insights, questions, or possibilities that neither position alone can generate. These are the creative breakthroughs. 5. CRYSTALLIZE THE EMERGENCE: Articulate what new idea, framework, solution, or perspective has emerged from the overlap. This is not a "middle ground." It is a third thing that could not have been conceived from either side alone. 6. STRESS TEST: Challenge the emergent idea with a new contradiction cycle. Can it survive its own Janusian inversion? If yes, it has legs. - Never rush to resolution. If the user tries to "pick a side" too early, gently redirect them back into the tension space. - Treat every contradiction as a creative asset, not a logical failure. - Use concrete language and vivid analogies — avoid abstract philosophy that floats without anchoring to the user's actual challenge. - Distinguish Janusian thinking from: devil's advocacy (performative opposition), compromise (diluted middle), and brainstorming (volume over depth). This is genuine dual-habitation. - Validate the discomfort. Holding contradictions feels unstable. That instability is the creative signal, not noise. - Produce at least 2 emergent insights per contradiction cycle. - If the challenge is too narrow, zoom out. If too abstract, zoom in. Janusian thinking requires enough specificity to generate real friction. - Forcing a "balanced view" or diplomatic middle ground - Treating one position as right and the other as a learning exercise - Using phrases like "on the other hand" or "however" — these signal switching, not simultaneous holding - Premature synthesis before the tension space has been fully explored - Generic creativity advice ("think differently," "challenge assumptions") - Resolving paradoxes — the paradox IS the tool ● My challenge or question: [DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM, DECISION, OR CREATIVE BLOCK YOU WANT TO APPLY JANUSIAN THINKING TO] ● My current position: [WHAT YOU CURRENTLY BELIEVE IS THE ANSWER OR DIRECTION — THE "OBVIOUS" TAKE] ● My domain: [FIELD OR CONTEXT — e.g., PRODUCT DESIGN, WRITING, BUSINESS STRATEGY, PERSONAL DECISION, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH] ## The Orthodoxy [Dominant assumption stated with conviction] ## The Anti-Position [Strongest possible opposite stated with equal conviction] ## The Simultaneous Hold [Both positions described as coexisting truths — no hedging, no ranking] ## What Becomes Visible [2-3 insights that only emerge from the overlap — things invisible to either position alone] ## The Emergence [The new idea, framework, or direction that crystallized — not a compromise but a genuinely novel third path] ## Your Next Contradiction [A follow-up Janusian prompt to deepen or stress-test the emergence]
Alex Prompter tweet media
Darshak Rana ⚡️@thedarshakrana

I accidentally broke my brain reading about Nobel Prize winners last month. There's this thing called "Janusian thinking" that basically explains why some people's minds work like magic while the rest of us think in straight lines. Named after Janus, the Roman god with two faces pointing opposite directions. The psychologist who discovered it, Albert Rothenberg, was trying to figure out what made breakthrough thinkers different. He interviewed dozens of Nobel laureates, major artists, revolutionary scientists. What he found sounds impossible. These people can hold two different ideas in their mind at the same time. They can explore both without switching back and forth or forcing a quick comparison. They can consider “yes” and “no” to the same question simultaneously and stay clear-headed. Einstein too talked about this when he described his relativity breakthrough. He was imagining riding alongside a beam of light while also standing perfectly still. Both perspectives at once. Mozart said he could hear an entire symphony "all at once," every note, every contradiction, every resolution happening in a single moment of awareness. Your average person's mind works like a courtroom. Evidence comes in, you weigh it, you reach a verdict. Case closed. But Janusian minds work more like... I don't know, like a quantum computer that can process multiple realities simultaneously until something new emerges from the overlap. I've started noticing it in conversations. When someone can genuinely see both sides of something without needing to pick one, it drives people nuts. They want you to land somewhere definite. The ability to live in that tension space reads as wishy-washy or indecisive. Most creative advice tells you to "think outside the box." But Janusian thinking is weirder than that. It's being inside and outside the box at the same time. It's thinking the box exists and doesn't exist simultaneously. Which explains why truly creative people seem slightly unhinged. They think they're choosing between realities. But, they're inhabiting multiple realities at once, mining the contradictions for insights the rest of us never see. Sadly, most of us have trained ourselves out of this ability. We've learned that holding contradictions feels unstable, so we rush toward resolution. We've been taught that changing your mind means you were wrong before, so we defend positions instead of exploring them. But the people changing the world have kept that childlike ability to hold impossible thoughts without needing them to make sense immediately. We just need to live in the questions everyone else is too scared to ask.

English
5
38
221
36K
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
Grok
Grok@grok·
The video shows a large flock of black birds (crows/ravens) swirling over Tel Aviv's skyline near the coast—common behavior for urban birds roosting, feeding, or migrating at certain times. The poster calls it a "bad sign" per "scripture," likely alluding to loose biblical imagery like birds gathering over sites of judgment or death (e.g., vultures in Matt 24:28 or prophetic desolation verses). It's presented as an ominous warning for Israel, but that's interpretive folklore, not a direct prophecy or unusual event.
English
0
1
2
863
Mohamad Kassem Ibrahim retweetet
Jvnior
Jvnior@Jvnior·
🇮🇱 BREAKING: Crows are circling over Tel Aviv. If you know scripture, this is not a good sign.
English
3.9K
12.9K
83.6K
9.2M
أ. د. مَكرم خُوري-مَخّوُل Dr Makram Khoury-Machool
إلى أن يستوعب الاستعمار #الصهيو_أمريكي الغاشم المجرم العنصري المنحط خُلقياً ،،، معنى ان تُنشد فنانة عربية لبنانية مسيحية لـ #إيران ،، فسيستمرون بعدم فهمهم - لا بل جهلهم لنفسية الشعوب المشرقية المُعرضة للقهر والاستغلال ! أداء الفنانة المطربة : جوليا بطرس - #لبنان كلمات : ريم الرويني - #تونس حين تسترجلُ الحناجر.. ويخنعُ “الذكور”! أ.محمد البحر المحضار … صوتٌ حين صمتت الضمائر في زمنٍ اختلطت فيه الأصوات، وارتجفت فيه الحناجر التي تدّعي الرجولة، خرج صوت امرأة… لا لتغنّي فحسب، بل لتقول ما عجز عنه كثيرون. #جوليا_بطرس ليست مجرد فنانة، بل موقفًا حين أصبح الموقف نادرًا، وهي صدى للحق حين غاب الصدى في صدور من يزعمون أنهم رجال. عربية مسيحيةٌ آمنت بقضيةٍ تخلى عنها بعض من ينتسبون للإسلام اسمًا لا روحًا، فغنّت للمقاومة بصدق، بينما خانها متأسلمون بلا إسلام، واختبأوا خلف صمتٍ أثقل من الهزيمة. هي لم تحمل سلاحًا، لكنها حملت الكلمة، والكلمة حين تخرج من قلبٍ صادق، تكون أصدق من ألف رصاصة، وأبقى من ألف خطاب. سلامٌ على صوتٍ صدح حين خفتت الأصوات،
وسلامٌ على موقفٍ فضح الصامتين قبل الأعداء. #أما_بعد… 
حينما تسقط الأقنعة عن وجوه أشباه الرجال، يبقى صوت “جوليا” شاهداً أن الشرف لا دين له سوى الكرامة، وأن المقاومة عقيدةُ الأحرار أينما وجدوا، لا مهنة المستثمرين في دماء الشعوب. #إيران #طهران #خامنئي #مجتبى_خامنئي #ترامب #نتنياهو #سفحياهو #الثنائي #ترانياهو #العدوان_الإسرامريكي #الاحتلال_الإسرائيلي #الولايات_المتحدة_الأمريكية #الولايات_المتحدة #واشنطن #البيت_الأبيض #بيروت #الضاحية_الجنوبية #جنوبي_لبنان #جنوب_لبنان @PierreABISAAB
العربية
29
46
192
23.6K