Frontiers in LUNC

Every cycle has a moment when the crowd wakes up late and asks, When did this happen? If a simple T-shirt can double the price of LUNC, then imagine what happens when real utility lands. We need actual usage, actual burn flow, actual reasons for capital to move through the chain. #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #Crypto

@SitohangSa54834 Right. Nothing beats real-world transaction volume. Every coffee, service, subscription, game or remittance paid in LUNC/USTC produces continuous fee flow and burn pressure.

@LUNCFrontiers What kind of utility can drive an organic pump for LUNC/USTC? A high-volume DEX, GameFi with burn mechanics, or real merchant payments? Sentiment alone won’t last. Real daily use creates consistent burns and sustainable demand. Thoughts? #LUNC #USTC #TerraClassic #UtilityMatters

Every cycle has a moment when the crowd wakes up late and asks, When did this happen? If a simple T-shirt can double the price of LUNC, then imagine what happens when real utility lands. We need actual usage, actual burn flow, actual reasons for capital to move through the chain. #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #Crypto

@TKMNCOIN Lowering the tax sounds simple, but it doesn’t solve the real problem. Investors don’t avoid LUNC because the tax is 0.5%. They avoid it because the chain hasn’t shown consistent utility or volume yet.

@LUNCFrontiers Remove or significantly reduce the tax to bring more investors to the chain.

@Snarzer4 The tax isn’t the blocker. On-Chain volume died long before the tax existed, and it won’t magically return just because we remove it. If the ecosystem shows real usage, tax or no tax, volume will flow.

@LUNCFrontiers Get rid of the TAX and that will happen!!! $LUNC $USTC

@LuncF18550 Indeed!

@LUNCFrontiers Golden time to swap LUNC with USTC

@DrippingQ19775 @BInodes_ You can buy it on Binance.

@BInodes_ @LUNCFrontiers Plx where can I buy

Dependence on Binance puts the entire chain in a fragile position. Binance controls the dominant share of $LUNC volume, its liquidity dictates price behaviour, and its whitelist exemption gives it operational advantages. The 50% fee burn is voluntary, not guaranteed, and if Binance adjusts its stance, LUNC could lose 70–85% of its trading activity instantly. #TerraClassic community has no leverage over Binance, while Binance holds leverage over the chain. This situation needs to be changed. #LUNC #USTC #Crypto

A fair question, but the reality is more complex. The chain’s decline isn’t tied to one group or one decision. It’s the consequence of operating years without a unified strategy for liquidity, utility, or real ecosystem growth. And you’re right to point it out, many top validators haven’t built a single product, service, or business model that both benefits them and strengthens on-chain utility. Without builders creating value and validators driving real economic activity, the chain naturally loses momentum.

@ismaildiker6 Few validators are building, but the ecosystem has become too dependent on #Binance and too focused on external saviors. #TerraClassic won’t recover through waiting. We need internal development, liquidity, and utility built on-chain.

@LUNCFrontiers Validatorler uyuyormu

CEX delistings follow clear triggers: falling liquidity, declining volume, rising regulatory pressure, and assets that no longer justify their maintenance costs or attract institutional demand. $LUNC is now meeting several of these conditions, which means further delistings are a realistic expectation based on market behaviour. The only way to change this trajectory is by rebuilding on-chain liquidity and real utility so the asset becomes economically worthwhile for exchanges to keep supporting. #LUNC #USTC #Crypto

@LuncIDOne No utility, no value.

@LUNCFrontiers 📉0.000001

Source: support.kraken.com/articles/notic…

@LuncF18550 We will share more information soon through the community channel.

@LUNCFrontiers Seen enough talk over the years. This is the first initiative that feels grounded. Let's see what is the method...

The #LUNCBurnArmy is entering a new phase, built on commitment, not capital. If you’re ready to contribute when the work begins, join here. x.com/i/communities/… #LUNC #USTC #LUNCcommunity #Crypto

@Torobche12345 Thanks for the support!

@LUNCFrontiers Count me in. Community-led action is the only way forward. Ready when you are

We don’t wait for miracles. We build them. A new wing of the LUNC Burn Army is rising. Together, we will burn LUNC through time, effort, and conviction, not cash. If you believe LUNC’s future is earned by its community, not left to chance, stand with us. Comment, join the mission, and help spread the word. #LUNC #USTC #LUNCcommunity #Crypto #LUNCBurnArmy

@Snarzer4 Right. But they could wait a bit more for LUNC price to rebound.

@LUNCFrontiers It's no different than when you pay for services at your home and inflation has brought down your dollar and repairman has raised prices. If the works done its done! Payment should be due. #LUNC

Proposal 12197 requesting 500M LUNC for Phase 2 of the Wasmd unforking, which is roughly 50% above its fair USD value at today’s price (~$0.00004). At this valuation, approving it now would: • Drain additional LUNC from the community pool when the token is undervalued. • Lock in a 50%+ premium that could be avoided by waiting for market recovery. • Deliver no immediate functional benefit, since this work is about long-term maintainability, not stability or utility. The task itself is sound but not time-critical. Funding it today means overpaying in LUNC terms. Delay this spending proposal. Validators should weigh not just the technical merits but also the economic timing, approving spends when $LUNC is undervalued drains far more from the community than necessary. #LUNC #LUNCcommunity #USTC #Crypto @orbit__labs

We’ve mentioned a few validators already @Allnodes @AutoStake_ @lunclive, but tag your validators here if you want them to weigh in on the economic and timing side too. Spending decisions shouldn’t ignore market conditions, especially when $LUNC is this undervalued.