Luis Ibáñez

@elhigadodmarita No sé si la sociedad promueve la cultura de la muerte, lo que sí sé es que los globalistas quieren reducir la población, ellos sí promueven la muerte, de miles de millones... y hordas de estúpidos progresistas les hacen el trabajo sucio. En "eso" se han convertido las izquierdas.

Elephant on the sofa: Spanish doctor warns of the increase in cancer cases and immune health issues as a result of 'Covid' [fake] vaccines. Dr. Luis Miguel Benito de Benito, a specialist in the digestive system, exposes the reality when so many stay silent about the bloody obvious. He denounces the rise in hematological and digestive tumors, especially in the young, and the appearance of so-called 'turbo cancers'. Dr. Benito directly points to the 'Covid' [fake] vaccines as a factor contributing to the deterioration of the immune system, stating that what many colleagues discuss in private must now be said publicly. He explains the worrying lack of response to current treatments and the institutional fear of acknowledging that the mass [fake] vaccination may have been a medical atrocity (which it was and is). He challenges official bodies to refute his clinical evidence with data.

@JuntsXCat @jorditurull Governen gràcies a vosaltres! Cinics! Nyords disfressats!

🗣 Secretari general @jorditurull: “La regularització massiva s’ha fet sense consens, traspassant tota la responsabilitat als ajuntaments i mentint sobre el català. Van presentar una primera proposta on el català era un requisit per la residència i en el text definitiu ho treuen. Per nosaltres, aquells ciutadans que vulguin que Catalunya sigui el seu país i el dels seus fills, han de conèixer sí o sí el català.”

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

"International waters must be free to transit" - So what about the US Blockade of Cuba..? The US has shown very little respect for International Law for over a hundred years...

@Partisan_12 Double check the weight of a blue whale! Ignorants!

A blue whale's poo can weigh as much as 4 tonnes making it the second largest piece of shit in the world just behind Donald Trump.

Is this some sort of a joke? The EU that supported the Genocide in Gaza + Lebanon, couldn't condemn the US/Israeli illegal invasion of Iran, has blocked Diplomacy in Ukraine from the start, couldn't condemn US invasion of Venezuela, now this EU wants to talk about Diplomacy..?

@PeterSweden7 I wouldn't

Jag har en fråga till dig. Om du hade vetat allt om covid vaccinet som vi gör idag, hade du fortfarande tagit det?

El 17 de abril de 1939, tras la ocupación nazi de Checoslovaquia después de que UK y Francia le regalaran los Sudetes, la URSS ofrecía una alianza antifascista a Gran Bretaña, EEUU y Francia, ofreciendo 1 millón de tropas para detener a Hitler. Los imperialistas occidentales rechazaron la oferta, no porque fuesen unos irresponsables, sino porque su plan desde el principio precisamente fue el de usar a Hitler como ariete contra el comunismo, para derrocar a la URSS, querían empujar al monstruo hacia el este. Esta oferta soviética, que ya era la 3ª vez que la ofrecía a UK, EEUU y Francia tras 1937 y 1938 (y en agosto de 1939 volvería a hacerlo por última vez).... fue realizada por el ministro de guerra Marshall Klementi Voroshilov y el jefe del estado mayor general del Ejército Rojo, Boris Shaposhnikov, ofrecieron hasta 120 divisiones de infantería (cada una con unos 19.000 soldados), 16 divisiones de caballería, 5.000 piezas de artillería pesada, 9.500 tanques y más de 5.500 aviones de combate y bombarderos en las fronteras de Alemania. "Si los británicos, franceses y estadounidenses, hubieran tomado en serio esta oferta, juntos podríamos haber puesto unas 300 o más divisiones en el campo en dos frentes contra Alemania, el doble del número que tenía Hitler en ese momento. Esta era una oportunidad para salvar el mundo o al menos detener al lobo en su camino". ", dijo el general sovietico Sotskov. Tras el rechazo de esta alianza antifascista, la URSS supo que jamás podría contar con Occidente, se vio completamente sola ante el monstruo hitleriano y sabía que era cuestión de tiempo que le invadiera, por lo que tuvo meses más tarde que guardarse las espaldas pactando un acuerdo de no-agresión con Alemania para ganar tiempo, poner en marcha la defensa, reforzar la industria militar y prepararse para la inevitable guerra contra los nazis.

@AntiWokeMemes That's a fact

Is 'Climate Change' a SCAM?

@Glenn_Diesen Very well said, @Glenn_Diesen. The shorter version is that we are on the evil side. We are — and have been — the "villains" for too long. However, the villains are now also coming after us.

We are told that security in the Middle East requires defeating Iran, security in East Asia requires defeating China, and security in Europe requires defeating Russia. We never discuss security in terms of how to learn to live together by harmonising interests and managing competition. This is by design. This is hegemonic peace, in which security depends on defeating rivals rather than managing a balance of power. Subsequently, security relies solely on deterrence rather than reassurance; diplomacy is dismissed as appeasement; peace agreements are temporary and deceptive; and war is peace. Our rivals do not have legitimate security concerns, as their policies are allegedly always motivated by aggressive, irrational, or expansionist behaviour. We have convinced ourselves that our liberal hegemony is a force for good, and that our opponents oppose our dominance because they reject our benign values of freedom. Discussing the security concerns of adversaries is believed to “legitimise” their policies, which is treasonous. The world is divided into good guys (liberal democracies) and bad guys (autocracies). We should not ask how defeating Russia, as the world's largest nuclear power, is a rational security strategy, or why our governments refuse to even speak with Moscow to discuss the European security architecture and end the war. Our governments have relabelled nuclear deterrence as nuclear blackmail to signal that there can be no more constraints. All empires can become irrational during decline. Leaders take greater risks to avoid decline, legitimacy crises at home must be distracted with enemies abroad, outdated strategies from a bygone era of strength are still embraced, and there is a tendency to double down on narratives of being indispensable, representing universal values, and dismissing all opposition as illegitimate and dangerous. Are we the fanatics?

@TulsiGabbard Tulsi, are you justifying Israel's genocides? All your propaganda about your very high principles was just that — propaganda? A psyop? You've become a genocide accomplice.

As we observe solemn week of Holocaust Remembrance, we honor the memory of the six million Jews and millions of others murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators. We stand in solidarity with survivors, their families, and all who carry the scars of that unimaginable evil. I will never forget my visit to the Warsaw Ghetto and Auschwitz. Walking through those grounds—seeing the gas chambers, the piles of shoes, eyeglasses, and personal belongings—left a profound and lasting impact on me. It was a visceral reminder of human’s capacity for evil, and of our duty to confront such hatred and darkness. We must ensure “Never Again” is not just words, but a guiding principle.

@0IvankaTrumpRV2 E

Simple poll. Please be honest! As of today, how much do you still trust this team? A. 100% B. 75% C. 50% D. 25% E. 0%

@SamaHoole please your comments on this insanity nos.nl/artikel/260967…

@mundo_viperino Son corruptos seguidores del WEF y su plan de despoblacion. Esto es antinutricion. Deberían ir s la cárcel por prevaricación y vonpiracion para hacer mal a toda la poblacion.

El Centro de Nutrición actualiza los cinco grupos de alimentos: un máximo de una albóndiga por semana‼️ (Me ahorro el comentario y os dejo aquí la información) El Centro de Nutrición de Países Bajos ha actualizado su guía alimentaria “Schijf van Vijf”, recomendando reducir el consumo de carne y aumentar el de proteínas vegetales. El nuevo consejo establece un máximo de 100 gramos semanales de carne roja magra, por debajo de recomendaciones anteriores de otros organismos. En total, se sugiere no superar los 300 gramos de carne a la semana, incluyendo carne blanca como el pollo. También se recomienda limitar el consumo de pescado a unos 100 gramos semanales y reducir la ingesta de queso. A cambio, se anima a aumentar el consumo de legumbres como lentejas y alubias, casi duplicando la cantidad recomendada previamente. El cambio responde tanto a criterios de salud como de sostenibilidad, ya que se busca reducir el impacto ambiental del sistema alimentario. Según el organismo, el actual modelo de consumo contribuye significativamente a problemas como el sobrepeso, la diabetes y las emisiones contaminantes. Las autoridades reconocen que el cambio hacia una dieta más vegetal debe ser progresivo y realista, ya que muchas personas aún no consumen suficientes legumbres de forma habitual. También se apunta que no solo los consumidores, sino también la industria y el gobierno, deben facilitar este cambio en los hábitos alimentarios. Fuente: nos.nl/artikel/260967…

@Alinavisoo_life No way.

SHOULD PORK BE REMOVED FROM SCHOOL CAFETARIAS OUT OF RESPECT FOR MUSLIMS? A. YES B. No

Alguna cosa a dir @orriolsderipoll? x.com/i/status/20447…

@AndersonAfDMdEP Age verification is surveillance & control of speech disguised as "protect kids"

@fartbox2024 @Oceanbreeze473 Gollum. Her evil showed on her face.

@Oceanbreeze473 I really shouldn't say this. It's really inappropriate. It's going to ruin me forever....ok here goes.......... Hilary didn't look that bad in that picture.

Young Bill & Hillary Clinton in the 1970s. Still together 50 years later. No scandals. No cheating. No drama. Just true love.

@SamaHoole Thus, we can only eat beef and lamb. Is it realistic?

You've done the research into seed oils. You stopped buying the bottles. No sunflower oil. No rapeseed. No vegetable blend. You feel good about this. I don't want to ruin your day, but it's not even close to done. The bread: rapeseed oil, third ingredient. The hummus: sunflower oil for that smooth commercial texture. The peanut butter: rapeseed added to stop the separation. The crackers, cereal bars, oatcakes: seed oil, page one. The dark chocolate: sunflower lecithin. The antioxidant claims on the front do not mention this. The restaurant salad, however virtuous: dressed in rapeseed or soybean. The healthy option. Still seed oil. But here's what catches most people out. Nuts and seeds. Almonds, walnuts, cashews, sunflower seeds, pumpkin seeds. All high in linoleic acid. All adding to the same PUFA load. The trail mix your colleague calls clean eating is seed oil in solid form. And then there's the meat. Chicken, pork, turkey, and farmed salmon are all fed corn and soy. What they eat, they store in their fat. A factory-farmed chicken in 2026 has a fat profile closer to sunflower oil than to what a chicken contained in 1960. You're eating the seed oil. You're just eating it through an animal. The only fats that stayed stable are from ruminants on grass. Beef. Lamb. Bison. Grass doesn't contain much linoleic acid, and neither does the animal that eats it. Even when it's finished on grain. The bottle was always the most visible part of a much bigger problem.

@viquirepublica Pitjor, es miserable

Que diu la del partit que el 2015 va utilitzar les clavegueres de l’estat, el 2019 els vots de Valls i el 2024 els vots del PP per fer-se amb Barcelona, que ha investit un unionista declarat, que es manifestava contra Catalunya, de la mà de l’extrema dreta, que enterrava gent amb calç viva, feia servir Pegasus per espiar persones il·legalment i signava un 155 al costat de l'extrema dreta de Ciudadanos, que no es pot normalitzar l'extrema dreta, i que les forces polítiques a Catalunya, que es diuen democràtiques, han d'actuar en conseqüència. Jéssica @jessicaalbiach, ets una cínica, ets un acudit!