⬢ LittleD⬡pHEX ⬢ $PLS $PLSX $INC

Stop using #Solana NOW, it’s broken!! 🛠️ Stop using #Ethererum NOW, it’s expensive! 💸 Stop using #Bitcoin, it’s Fat! 🐘 Migrate to #PulseChain 🔥 60x Faster than #Bitcoin 1300x Cheaper fees than #Ethereum 100% Uptime not like #Solana PULSECHAIN.COM its Better!

@FundingGym @febrocasPT @RichardHeartWin Loud and clear 😂 Do you also look at the charts and sigh sometimes, or are you always zen as a true Heart maxi? Anyway, agree, bear market wrecked almost everyone.

@LittleDope85 @febrocasPT @RichardHeartWin “If you don’t know why a crypto is in the top 10, you need to shut the f#ck up.” RH

For all those who: “the problem is @RichardHeartWin $HEX $PLS $PLSX $INC” find me something that hasn’t sucked in the crypto world in the last 4 years!!

The way I read Richard most of the time is "you can win with me, just not as much as I win." Which by extension means "you can lose with me, just not as much as I lose." People will push back hard on that second half, but if it wasn't true he'd have bounced by now. If you actually think the whole thing is a scam, ask yourself why he's still here. He doesn't need more money to disappear. Plastic surgery, new passports, quiet life somewhere with no extradition, that's all trivially available to someone with his resources. The fact that he's still around, still tied to the chain, still publicly attached to all of it, is its own signal. Not proof of anything. Just a data point that doesn't really fit the pure grift narrative. So... I remain.

@febrocasPT @RichardHeartWin but has also been brutally attacked by the SEC, w Richard himself being investigated & wanted across Europe on what many consider an unfounded accusation. The comparison isnt really fair when one side has been embraced by the establishment & the other has been actively suppressed

@febrocasPT @RichardHeartWin You’re considering projects like $BNB, $TRX and even $ETH, coins that have been listed on major CEXes and have been mainstream for years. PulseChain, HEX, PulseX and the entire Richard Heart ecosystem, on the other hand, is not only heavily gatekept everywhere ..

🎉 ZKX Wallet is NOW LIVE 🎉 A secure, self-custodial wallet extension built for seamless access to PulseChain and beyond is now officially available. For anyone who wants to experience the full power of DeFi, download ZKX Wallet now 🚀🚀

@LibertySwapFi @zkxwallet 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽

🎉 ZKX Wallet is NOW LIVE! 🎉 We are thrilled to announce the official release of @zkxwallet built by @LibertySwapFi for users who want full control, seamless DeFi access, and real privacy. Key Features: 👉 Shield & Unshield Assets: Instantly move funds between public and private balances using advanced zero-knowledge privacy tech (powered by Railgun integration). 👉Send, Swap & Bridge: Fast transfers, token swaps, and cross-chain bridging directly in the extension. 👉Full PulseChain and EVM Support: Works seamlessly across Ethereum, PulseChain, and other EVM-compatible networks. 👉Non-Custodial Security: You control your keys. We never have access to your funds. 👉 Fully open-source 👉Clean, Intuitive Interface: Designed for both beginners and experienced crypto users. Whether you’re shielding stablecoins gaslessly, trading across chains, or simply want privacy by default, ZKX has you covered.

But RT, why do you want the illusion? Is it because it's easier to sell the chain if that illusion exists? In any other scenario, I'd prefer the risk to be known vs obscured. So why is this different? In any kind of bridge you cannot remove trust from the equation at some layer. So if you have to trust at some point in the stack, why do you want to make the person with that trust have a harder time of doing their job? God forbid the bridge is ever hacked, but if it were to be. It seems ideal to be able to quickly address is vs having to wait on some consortium of people (of which some maybe be co-conspirators in the hack) or prevented from taking action via time lock. The security theatre may look nice to people who don't want to think. But that theatre itself often gets in the way of actual security needs. Sure it's better to not need it, but no one has truly found a way of not needing it. Bridges inherently are not without risk.

@RichardHeartWin Richard, your work has been nothing short of legendary. You’ve built real innovation and technology that actually works while most people just talk. The price is down purely because of weak-handed sellers and non-believers who lack vision and patience.

Prices suck. Yell stupid things at me, so you feel better.

Richard Heart teaches you how bridges work. Example. Chain A to Chain B. Coins lock on Chain A. MAGIC Coins mint on Chain B. What's this MAGIC step? Chain B doesn't know what's happening on Chain A, so TRUST must be introduced. You have to TRUST validators to not collude with each other to lie about what happened on Chain A. Validators could lie about how much went in on chain A, and inflation bug chain B, then some could bridge back the inflated coins and empty the original coins locked on Chain A. What if a validator dies? What if a validator gets hacked? What if a validator tries to get others to collude with him to lie? What if a validator holds his validating ransom. Some people think that there should be a timelock over the power to try and fix the above problems. LOL. What's the counter balance to the above problems? More trust. You might want some mechanism to add / remove, subtract the quantity of validators needed. In the end, every single bridge has social risk, just like every single chain has social risk. They're computers, run by humans, on networks, and none of those 3 things is perfect. You can only buy down the risk of the original sin of chain B not knowing the true state of chain A, by spreading validation geographically, and across parties and hope for the best, but you can't completely eliminate the risk. The largest hacks in crypto history have been bridge hacks. So now ask yourself, why in this bearest of bear markets does Richard have to teach you about bridges and risks again, for the umpteenth time? As though something has changed? I've been telling you these same exact things over and over again. But I guess some need reminding, or prefer to talk about risk in every thread about benefits. Makes you wonder. TLDR: All bridges are risk, and when done well, that risk appears to be far lower than centralized exchange risk. You're welcome for the education. Again. P.S. Some people have swapped bridged in tokens for native tokens, and enjoyed the experience. P.P.S. I think some folks find it far easier to post negatively than positively. If y'all one of those, work on yourself. Consider it personal development.

@qss0809 @RichardHeartWin

@LittleDope85 @RichardHeartWin Another point is that the eth I sacrificed in 2022 is far more than yours. The phex I purchased was even more than ten times yours. Small investors, don’t look at others with your little funds.

@HexoHart420 @RichardHeartWin Yes, Bitcoin outperformed because it is simpler, perceived as much safer, far more liquid, and supported by powerful institutional narratives. Not many others like btc, Even Ethereum sucked

@LittleDope85 @RichardHeartWin $BTC

@qss0809 @RichardHeartWin Richard Heart never promised to make you rich in 6 months. He promised to build something solid. And he’s doing exactly that. Stay Hexican 💎

@qss0809 @RichardHeartWin While you’re tweeting “never buy any of Richard’s items” from an account made 5 minutes ago, thousands of Hexicans from 2020/2021 are still here and have never sold. The market rewards vision and conviction, not people crying because the price is down.

@luchino_saltato L’avevo subito notato anch’io… movimento da fuoriclasse! 10 e lode.. inutile girarci intorno, con Gabbia la difesa è un’altra storia

Lo avevo criticato per essersi perso l’uomo, ma la realtà è che se oggi non siamo quarti è grazie al movimento che fa Gabbia per mettere Thuram in fuorigioco Non ci fosse stato lui questo sarebbe stato il gol partita e oggi saremmo quarti

a short story @litecoin It's ok, PulseChain and HEX will continue bragging about 100% uptime for years and years and years since launch.

PulseChain $PLS is superior software, with more security and functionality than $XRP, $DOGE, $ADA, $BCH, $XLM, $LTC. But all those are worth billions and billions. What's more likely, PLS moves up in rank or they move down? With Ethereum $ETH as PulseChain's testnet, the security is so cozy.

I think in the next couple years PulseChain will be considered one of the best investments people could have made. Especially $HEX and $PLSX People will look at all the true believers and call us lucky, but they will have no clue what we endured to win.

I see so many “influencers” begging wallets that don’t care about PulseChain (and have proved that time and time again) for features and support; this time it’s transaction simulation. PulseChain has a wallet that has prioritized PulseChain over every other blockchain in existence since inception: @InternetMoneyio. Imagine if that same community energy was put into rallying around Internet Money - we could build ANYTHING for PulseChain. Including, transaction simulation. We’ve consistently proved that we can and will deliver. What stops you from supporting Internet Money who loves PulseChain and motivates you to beg other wallets who hate it? If this question applies to you, I encourage you to answer.