@Hk74j6 @xumouren_yt 现在川普政府执政，在这四年，该政府是美国的合法的代表者, 特别是政府首脑。
川普之前，没有任何一任美国总统和伊朗发生过战争。从对伊朗战争这一件事情而言，这届政府也算是唯一代表美国对伊朗作战。
中文
MIT MIT
66 posts
@maitian99 2025年5月关税胜利日前，美国商家都开始囤货了。
到26年一月还没停止囤货？
特朗普没上台前，全世界都知道他要搞关税。怎么到了一年后，还“预期”他要搞关税。
中文
重磅消息：一位退役美国陆军将领称伊朗战争是美国历史上最大的地缘政治灾难。他证实伊朗是一座固若金汤的堡垒，特朗普如同把手伸进了马蜂窝，无路可退。五角大楼一片恐慌。
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara
BOMBSHELL: A retired US Army General calls the Iran war the greatest geopolitical disaster in the history of America. He confirms Iran is an impenetrable fortress and Trump has stuck his hand in a hornets nest with no way out. The Pentagon is panicking.
中文
@wshngknshji1 从货物贸易角度，美国对这个海峡需求很小。亚洲国家和欧洲更需要海峡。
美国现在打击伊朗更主要还是核设施和他们的武装力量。海峡开不开，美国完全可以不管。
中文
伊朗这一招够“损”也够聪明。
伊朗对霍尔木兹海峡玩弄分而治之的策略，而且奏效了。
伊朗有一套办法：阻止美国和其盟友船只通行，放行那些敢于对抗美国的国家的船只。
法国今天顺利通过，前两天西班牙船只也顺利通过。
西班牙是对美国军队关闭领空的国家，法国是在联合国大会上与中国俄罗斯一起支持伊朗的国家。
伊朗这一招够“损”又够聪明，让川普恼火。
川普前面喊话北约国家，有胆量就去霍尔木兹海峡拿油，但法国和西班牙没有费一兵一卒，只要以实际行动与美国切割就能获得通行。
每一艘顺利通过的欧洲船只都一再证明：不需要美国保护也能保持贸易畅通。
美国怎么办？
放任海峡被伊朗控制？那么自己和自己的盟友包括海湾各国的船只都不能通过霍尔木兹，国际地位受到挑战不说，国际油价就会一直维持高位，世界经济就会受到严重影响，美国经济也会跟着被拖累，而中期选举越来越近。
打通霍尔木兹？没有人帮忙。只能靠自己派兵去地面战，结果又是一个未知数。地面战如果没打好，那就不是中期选举的问题了，连2028都够呛。
围绕霍尔木兹海峡的博弈，估计是川普在开战之初根本没有想到，而现在又不得不面对的最大的问题。
海阔天空@wshngknshji1
法国的“付出”终于得到了回报。 伊朗外长宣布，伊朗允许法国船只在霍尔木兹海峡自由通行，法国成为继西班牙之后第二个获得此项特权的欧洲国家。 伊朗现在正逐步分化美国的盟友。
中文
@jkimballcook The Supreme Court did exclude the native indians from the 14th amendment, correct?
English
because the Supreme Court is not a legislature
John Lusi@JFLusi
@dilanesper Why is there so little discussion about how terrible the actual policy of birthright citizenship is, regardless of its constitutionality? How can opposition to eliminating this policy be construed as anything other than an intention to harm the interests of the United States?
English
@ladiesofliberty The 14th amendment has been the supreme law of American soil. However, its interpretation/implementation has been flawed.
It is time to restore everything back to the amendment's original, correct meaning/intention.
English
The 14th Amendment has been the law since 1868. If you think it's wrong, there's a process for changing it — it's called a constitutional amendment. An executive order isn't that. Whatever you think about immigration, a president rewriting the Constitution with a pen should concern everyone.
English
@TRHLofficial I suspect Trump may attempt to issue a second EO within the boundaries of the ruling.
English
SCOTUS may rule that birthright citizenship is constitutional, using precedent and a loose interpretation of an earlier ruling, so we may need to approach the issue of one million Chinese communists voting in our elections in the future differently. As it holds, they can’t even be denaturalized. There would definitively and permanently be no solution and creating citizens of those who dilute our values is republic ending.
What we can do now, is aggressively and publicly enforce FARA, the Espionage Act, and related statutes against anyone (citizen or not) acting under CCP direction. Prosecute espionage, influence ops, and undisclosed CCP ties. That’s really it though.
If it’s ruled constitutional for anyone infiltrate and dismantle our republic, all we can do is try to disincentivize it. How utterly demoralizing.
English
@DarrenBrow88977 @BrennCookk @ryanswalters73 No, the two sentences are perfectly parallel to each other, meaning they are two separate categories/cases.
"who are foreigners, aliens" is parallel to "who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States".
English
English
It’s so simple, only a complete moron, or TDS leftist, could possibly misunderstand it. A simple understanding of language, punctuation, and sentence structure helps too.
Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan introduced the 14th amendment and said this:
"This amendment which I have offered, is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."
English
@jkimballcook The long-term practice of that constitutional rule of law has been flawed.
This is a time to correct that incorrect practice so that we stay better aligned with that constitutional rule of law.
English
anyone who says it is suicidal to keep the same constitutional rule of law that has been the rule in the United States since the founding (with the exception of a few years with Dredd Scott) is just ignorant and hysterical
if there are good reasons to change that rule, amend it
English
@BrennCookk @ryanswalters73 He said "foreigners, aliens" even before "ambassadors". Why did you ignore "foreign, aliens" that he said?
English
@ryanswalters73 It is pretty clear that only excludes children born to ambassadors and gov. agents because they're not subject to US jurisdiction, ie diplomatic immunity. Why do you guys hate the constitution so much?
English
@routangseng516 历史上，最高法院的确判过某些类别的人群，比如美国原住民，不受第14修正案覆盖，不能自动获取出生地公民权。后来国会通过立法才给他们公民权。
根据这样的先例，最高法院有权确定哪些人群属于14修正案不覆盖的例外情况。
中文
这个曹长青也是个活宝，居然管自己叫保守派。我们痛恨民主党三女孩，不正是因为她们把党派立场、意识形态置于司法原则之上吗？
现在确实出现了这样的问题：自动公民权被钻空子，仅仅我认识的人里，就有不下十个，孩子在美国出生，或者去美国代孕。但这个需要国会修改法律来解决，而不是由法院曲解法条去解决。
如果法院可以也应该从现实需要出发去判案子，那美国法院不成中国法院了吗？保守派大法官又在保守什么呢？橡皮泥吗？
曹長青@CaoChangqing
美国最高法院辩论出生权问题，川普总统罕见地去现场聆听，因这个裁决将决定，川普之前的行政命令是否合法：取消原来的只要在美国出生就自动获得美国公民权。因太多人钻空子，怀孕后到美国分娩，或用“借腹生子”、试管婴儿等等，来获得美国公民身份。川普要做的，就是恢复美国的法治，恢复常识，制止欺诈。 但在美国，左派左媒，还有左派大法官，却摆出道德婊的姿态，玩政治正确，这才是美国的问题。 不要看那些大法官们对具体法律条文背得多熟，但碰到常识问题（定义男女）都说不清，不是最高法官，简直是最高笨蛋。失去常识，践踏常识的，不仅是笨蛋，常常也是坏蛋。
中文