Beercules

6.1K posts

Beercules

Beercules

@MadBeercules

Unsettled.

Beigetreten Mayıs 2022
303 Folgt660 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Beercules
Beercules@MadBeercules·
پیچیده ترین رابطه‌ی انسانی، رابطه آدم با خودشه.
فارسی
1
7
114
4.1K
Beercules retweetet
Prof. Balthazar
Prof. Balthazar@Prof__Balthazar·
تاریخ انقلاب آمریکا رو بخونی میبینی تو ۸۰٪ موارد پدران بنیانگذار با هم اختلاف دارن. مدام دعوا می‌کنن و به هم خائن می‌گن. ولی تهش اتحادشون رو ۲۰٪ توافق و اهداف مشترک از دست نمی‌دن. ما اصلا این کار رو بلد نیستیم. اگه با کسی ۱۰٪ اختلاف داشته باشیم بخاطرش میرینیم تو ۹۰٪ توافق و اتحاد
فارسی
27
97
984
23K
Beercules retweetet
mahdyar
mahdyar@mahdyar_fl·
وحید پاشو، من یه آشغالم باهات حرف دارم.
فارسی
5
54
2.9K
45.9K
Beercules retweetet
mahdie
mahdie@itsmahdieh·
Only ترور هدفمند can fix me.
6
192
3.9K
39K
-سی
-سی@alvaroxmorata·
خاک بر سر بی‌مصرفم کنن. کاش بمیرم. همین الان. خدایا کیرم تو زندگی‌ای که واسه ما ساختی.
فارسی
1
0
1
115
Jut 🍋
Jut 🍋@Lemmontartt·
امروز وپن بابامو وصل کردم شب پرسیدم اینترنت چطور بود؟ خوش گذشت؟ گفت بابا زیاد نرفتم. هیچکدوم از دوستام وصل نیستن. دلم سوختش 😭😭
فارسی
7
0
358
5.1K
Beercules
Beercules@MadBeercules·
@Th3__W4nd3r3r ثبات تنگه هرمز از اکانت تو بیشتره.
فارسی
1
0
0
17
Beercules retweetet
Papii🥤
Papii🥤@ammalusty·
I used to have this mental illness where l thought logical arguments would change someone's mind
English
673
29.7K
163K
2.6M
Beercules retweetet
حافظه تاریخی
حافظه تاریخی@hafezeh_tarikhi·
امیرعلی حاجی‌زاده، فرمانده وقت نیروی هوافضای سپاه پاسداران، ۲۳ شهریور ۱۳۹۶: کسی که باعث شد برنامه موشکی تا این حد گسترش پیدا کند و امروز در هر شهر و شهرستان و استان یک پایگاه موشکی داشته باشیم، دکتر قالیباف است
فارسی
149
2.7K
9K
233.2K
Beercules
Beercules@MadBeercules·
@Zahrarl_ خدا پشت و پناهش باشه
فارسی
0
0
1
19
Zahra
Zahra@Zahrarl_·
@MadBeercules رفت الان دست براش تکون دادم
فارسی
1
0
4
89
Beercules
Beercules@MadBeercules·
به نظرم تنها واکنش طبیعی و درست به شرایط موجود اینه که کصخلت در بره، به کدوم جهت و با چه سرعتی هم مهم نیست، فقط در بره.
فارسی
1
3
16
394
نیمستراداموس
نیمستراداموس@nimstraa·
داشتم از سر چهارراه رد می‌شدم، یکی از پرچم به دست‌ها زل زد تو چشمم داد زد: مرگ بر منافق.
فارسی
4
0
75
3.6K
Beercules retweetet
نیمستراداموس
نیمستراداموس@nimstraa·
درو باز کن ببین من چه شکلی‌ام بدووووون برق
فارسی
1
6
52
1K
نیمستراداموس
نیمستراداموس@nimstraa·
من یه دونه اسلحه میخوام اگه کوردا اجازه بدن باید با دنیا تسویه کنم.
فارسی
4
26
536
11.8K
Beercules retweetet
Miilato
Miilato@miiilato·
“you’re always sleeping” god forbid a mf wants to stay unconscious
English
23
4.8K
32.4K
398.8K
Beercules retweetet
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
Ryan Saavedra@RyanSaavedra

Secretary of State Marco Rubio gives an excellent explanation on why the U.S. needed to strike Iran It's less than 2 minutes and is worth the watch

English
996
7.2K
30.3K
3.9M