Marci Bunny 🐰

None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified).

@GayTory @MediaSOI Oi

@MediaSOI We want nowt to do with that. Let’s call it trans.

Bit gay innit?

Starmer won’t proscribe the IRGC or open the oil fields. He held out on protecting our bases for as long as he could. Khan runs London. The Jew-hate marchers are on Steroids and Mahmood is deliberately ignoring it despite what it will provoke. The Islamists are in charge of our decision makers exactly as we go to war (like it or not) with Islamist Republic. Face it or don’t face it. What the rest of the UK does about this is crucial.

@Only1Tommo96 Season ticket renewal time ?

🚨BREAKING | Arsenal are exploring the possibility of signing kvicha Kvaratskhelia in the summer. It’s understood that the player's camp is at least open to exploring t ...𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲

I agree with you , it's great Lowe raised the issue , but to not highlight this change was strange and made me suspect his motives too . It's a horrible horrible change. The family court scene is tough enough for dads as it is . And this change will only encourage and incentivise more women to make up false claims against dads which will be very hard to disprove and put them right on the back foot . A mother never ( or very very rarely ) has to prove her worth .

@Marcisissy @RupertLowe10 You are right that he didn’t highlight the upcoming changes. And that’s why I don’t trust what he is saying. The same applies to the organizations who claim to support fathers - they barely make token mentions every now and then.

The family court system is built on the sad idea that fathers are less essential than mothers in the raising of children - that is wrong, and a Restore Britain Government would change it. The odds are often unfairly stacked against fathers, and many have to fight tooth and nail at huge expense to get access to their own children following what can be malicious complaints. In many cases, these fathers have done nothing wrong - mothers are also affected, but the victims are primarily men. Kept away from their sons and daughters for months and months. Years even. It's morally outrageous. Children need a mother and a father to stand the best chance at healthy development. Family courts promote the idea that fathers are, at best, a nice thing to have. At worst? An enemy. They require radical restoration, putting the child's safety and wellbeing at the very top of the agenda. That means providing fair access to fathers when it is safe to do so for the child. The current system does not provide that in a timely and reasonable manner. A Restore Britain Government would stand up for decent dads everywhere who have been unfairly and cruelly ripped away from their children.

This is really important. Never mind the 'Zionism is racism' title - this motion, if passed, would align the Green Party with Hamas's aim of destroying Israel through armed force. It would make them more extreme than the Palestinian Authority.

@Only1Tommo96 @SkySportsPL Lols 🤣

🚨 JUST IN | Arsenal are interested in signing Elliot Anderson. ℹ️ @SkySportsPL

@Mo_Arsenal9 Heads gone

🗣️ Martin Keown on Mikel Arteta: “I’ll say this — mark my words. I’m actually worried. From what I’ve seen in him and how he has transformed Arsenal F.C. without prior managerial experience… If Arteta wins the Premier League, every team in the league should be concerned. They’ll need to prepare for a potential 10-year dominance under this man.” 🔴⚪️

@BraveFathers @RupertLowe10 You missed my point .. Rupert Lowe didn't highlight this change . And it's a significant change ,

@Marcisissy @RupertLowe10 Exactly, it says “involvement.” So if the father is ordered to send one postcard every month, that’s considered involvement. And in practice, the court often makes a similar order, thus satisfying the law. Involvement doesn’t mean you get to take your child to the park.

@BraveFathers @RupertLowe10 It does if you know what you're doing I'm not playing semantics If you are a good dad with a good track record , no court is going to award a post card as best for the child. Not a one son.

@BraveFathers @RupertLowe10 And on top of that the fact that a mother argued against it , worked against her and helped the dad. She was shooting herself in the foot and considered unreasonable . That's now gone too. Thanks to starmer.

@BraveFathers @RupertLowe10 I have a 50/50 2 ears 1 mouth son use then in that proportion You might just learn something I probably wouldn't have got my 50/50 with starmers change The courts and cafcas followed the guidelines that a child was served best by both parents . That's now been taken away .

@adamkeys_ Who you writing about ?

@Marcisissy Who was?

Thierry Henry introduced a whole new style of forward play. He changed the positioning of a striker, brought an unstoppable blend of pace, power, technical brilliance and creativity in both goal scoring and chance creation. 20 years after leaving #Arsenal, he is still a reference point and a hero for the likes of Kylian Mbappé and Alexender Isak, and many more. Mo Salah leaves a phenomenal legacy, and stands alongside Kevin De Bruyne as the greatest player of the last decade, but it takes something else to beat Thierry Henry when it comes to the crown as the Premier League's greatest ever player. He is still the king. #ad

@WilliamM1776 @MediaSOI Ah another low iq beta Brit 🤡

@MediaSOI You must be Jewish or you have no idea who the jews really are. Just been brainwashed by mainstream BBC news.

I lost 63 followers for supporting Jewish people Fuck em

@GoonerEG gay

Winning the Premier League with your boyhood club would be such a great thing.

CAFCASS uses it when writing Section 7 reports that judges rely on heavily.CAFCASS produces practical guidance for its Family Court Advisers (FCAs) who report to judges in private law children cases (e.g. child arrangements disputes). One key document is "Understanding why a child does not want to spend family time with a parent" (part of the Child Impact Assessment Framework, first issued 2018 and updated 2024–25).cafcass.gov.ukThis guidance explicitly ties into the statutory presumption and states:“The guidance should be considered within the context of the presumption of parental involvement as currently set out in the Children and Families Act of 2014 which is designed to achieve two important aims: namely, when assessed and found to be safe, children are able to maintain a relationship with both their parents…”cafcass.gov.ukLater in the same document (p. 19):“We are seeking to ensure that a child has a beneficial relationship with both of their parents where it is likely to be safe to do so.”cafcass.gov.ukAnd on p. 15:“The court must carefully balance its decisions to support a safe plan being in place for both children and adults, for children to be able to maintain positive relationships with both parents where this is considered safe and, in the child’s best interests.”cafcass.gov.uk

That’s incorrect. There was no presumption that the child needs both parents. The presumption was that it’s in the child best interest for a parent to be involved if it’s safe to do so. In practice, if a parent is ordered by the court to send a postcard once a month to a four-year old child, the law is satisfied that a parent is involved and the child has contact. If the new law passes, even that postcard will be taken away. So the child with absolutely no contact with a parent will not be considered to be at any disadvantage. But there has never been a time where the Family Courts held the view that the child needs both parents.

@lynnie882 topless horseback.....ideal

@Marcisissy He should go topless for the next one, like the classic Eva Herzigova ad. Maybe 'Scouting for Boys' as the slogan. 😏

The ego on this lemon lols 🤣

@OBG_AFC Beta bullshit

Mikel Arteta knows that doing this sends a clear message to Pep and the citeh players, which is this: ​Arteta explicitly stated after the match that the gesture was about respect. By staying, he signaled that despite the fierce rivalry and the high stakes of the title race, he still views Guardiola as a mentor and Citeh as a benchmark. ​By forcing his players to stand and watch their rivals celebrate, he was ensuring they felt the full weight of the loss. ​The Message: "Look at what we missed out on". ​By standing his ground rather than running to the dressing room, Arteta projected defiance. It showed a team that is comfortable in the spotlight, even in defeat. It was a visual representation of the new Arsenal: a team that no longer feels inferior to Citeh, but rather feels like they belong on that same podium.