✨MartinB ✨🦍🍌 retweetet
Summary of the actual IIP-Discussion State:
ℹ️ IIP-29 Gains Strong Momentum!
The community-driven IIP-29 proposes a dynamic minimum validator commission = validator's voting power % (VP%) per epoch.
Goal: Prevent stake concentration, stop unsustainable 0% fee-dumping by large validators, and boost real decentralization + long-term validator sustainability.
✅ Massive validator support (~45% VP of validators are responding (without evaluating IF-related validators), including TokenLabs, Nansen, Kiln, Stakin, Alchemy, BLOCKPI, Lavender.Five, and many more)
✅ IOTA Foundation Research officially supports proceeding with this IIP to observe its positive impact on network health.
This lightweight change ties responsibility (VP) to economic commitment — simple, fair, and effective.
Discussion: github.com/iotaledger/IIP…
Thank you to everyone contributing! 💚
DLT.GREEN ® 💚@dlt_green
Summary of the actual IIP-Discussion State: github.com/iotaledger/IIP… with update: #discussioncomment-15570413" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/iotaledger/IIP…
The GitHub discussion (#29) on the IOTA Improvement Proposals (IIPs) repository proposes DLT.GREEN-IIP: ℹ️ Dynamic Minimum Commission based on the Validator's Voting Power per Epoch. It's currently in Draft status, initiated on January 16, 2026, by DLT.GREEN with support from 18 IOTA OGs. ▶️ Support: Strong from numerous validators (e.g., TokenLabs, Meria, Stardust Staking, Nansen, P2P.ORG, Blockscope, Stakin, NODERS, Nodes.Guru, Sentio, Liquify, Nightly) and participants. Praised for simplicity, decentralization boost, healthier competition, and non-punitive approach. Total: ~20 supportive validators. ▶️ Responses from DLT.GREEN: Defends dynamic model for fairness to new validators; addresses circumvention (harder with splitting); open to refinements like hybrids; redirects off-topic ideas (e.g., unstaking rewards, validator pools) to new IIPs. ℹ️ General Tone: Positive momentum; support outweighs critiques. Focus on incentive alignment for long-term network health. ℹ️ Current Status Open and Ongoing: 28 comments, 42 replies, 24 participants. No formal updates to the proposal yet; remains in draft for further feedback. Discussion emphasizes monitoring stake trends via tools like dlt.green/en/services/io…. Overall: Broad consensus on addressing zero-fee issues, with refinements under consideration to enhance decentralization without over-regulation. English
