Hermes

7.8K posts

Hermes banner
Hermes

Hermes

@ModernHerm

Fleet of foot. Sound of mind.

USA Beigetreten Şubat 2025
103 Folgt63 Follower
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@animalologist I think the fact that like 95% of her posts that I see are about finding a massively wealthy bald guy a woman like 20 years younger than him gives it a very nasty vibe. Nobody believes those women are genuinely falling in love. She’s a madame. People will have opinions.
English
0
0
0
10
taco belle
taco belle@animalologist·
It really wilds me out how angry some people are at Blaine for simply running a successful business that they deride. Mostly men, angry that other men who have way more money than them value matchmaking. She found PMF and they’re misdirecting rage at the market towards her…
Blaine Anderson@datingbyblaine

Why is matchmaking expensive? To illustrate, here’s how I’ll lose money on a client’s $49,000 package. Client is 46, 6’2, exited tech founder. He’s looking for a woman 27-33, very specific criteria around match personality, appearance, and profession. Without diving into specifics, she: • Isn’t easily searchable online... • Isn’t likely to reply when we find her… • Isn’t likely to be single… • Often has a deal-breaker trait we can’t screen for without a phone call… • Isn’t necessarily interested in my client… I was expecting this to be a difficult search, so I quoted $49,000. I wasn’t expecting ~100 hours of labor to find each match, not including communication with the client! To date I’ve spent $45,000 on salaries for the women staffed on his search, plus $2,750 on styling and photos, and we still owe the client 2 matches... Before considering overhead (let alone opportunity cost) this will be a huge L financially. Things balance out though. Most engagements are profitable. Some engagements are quite profitable. For example, a new client in NYC paid $30,000 and paused after his first match, because he’s 99% sure we found his wife. That's still a new relationship, and engagements last 9 months (6 months of active matching + up to 3 months of pause), so we could be on the hook for more work in coming months. But you get the point 🙏

English
21
4
231
19.2K
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok Offer whatever justifications you like. Not a lot of countries have grown their borders via war since the Cold War. I think the list is Russia, Morocco, Turkey, Israel. Since 2000, just Russia and Israel. Nice company.
English
1
0
0
30
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
Selective quotes + ahistorical maps = propaganda. No Palestinian state in 1946, Arabs rejected partition, Jordan/Egypt held the land until 1967 - and the territory Israel gained came out of wars it didn’t start. Calling that “proof of expansionism” is, as I said before - total bullshit.
English
1
0
0
21
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok Ben Gurion: “A Jewish state in part of the land is not the end, but the beginning… we shall expand to the whole country” Bibi says he’s on a “historic and spiritual mission” and that he is “very attached” to the idea of Greater Israel. 🤔🤔
Hermes tweet media
English
1
1
0
24
florence ⏹️
florence ⏹️@morallawwithin·
Then I must be confused about one of the following (which I might well be): —whether holding someone’s neck so that you block the blood flow can be called asphyxiation —whether people who talk about choking during sex are usually referring to the above I think the latter is more likely to be where I’m mistaken; am I? If so, what do people mostly do that’s referred to as “choking”—just holding someone’s neck firmly, but not enough to block blood flow?
English
2
0
1
182
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok The Zionist goal has been consistent. Recreate biblical Israel as a Jewish state. When the UN was helping them, they supported it. At the first sign of resistance, it became “antisemitic”. Zoom out. Jews have made tremendous progress toward greater israel in the past 100 years.
English
1
0
0
33
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
@ModernHerm @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok You’re confusing 1947 with 2026 and pretending like the UN is the same thing it was. Additionally, it was committed to law. The fact that Arab Israelis are not being displaced and have full and equal rights today is a strong testament to his sincerity.
English
1
0
0
33
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
It was ten years prior. Circumstances were much different in 1937 than they were in 1947. I think a public declaration is much more likely to reveal his true intent because no one is beholden to a personal letter. The fact that your whole argument is based on “I think Ben Gurion was lying in the Declaration of Independence” is laughable.
English
1
0
0
18
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
Why would the Arabs say no to this utopia you mention? You do realize they also rejected that, correct? Because that plan recognized Jewish national rights and autonomy and that was unacceptable to the Arabs. The Jews didn’t “insist” on a damn thing. They would certainly have accepted less land. The percentage was determined by a UN committee trying (imperfectly) to balance demographics, land use, and political realities of the time.
English
1
0
0
17
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok I can help with your misunderstanding. The British were leaving regardless. There was also proposal for one state, Palestine, a democracy for all in the area. That’s what they lost in the partition plan. Why would the Jews say no and insist on more than half the land?
English
1
0
0
13
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
But they did refuse to be peaceful. They rejected partition and literally initiated violence the next day. I don’t get what you’re not understanding here. Maybe I would understand if the partition was an offer to split a current established state but there was no Palestinian state. Partition would have given them one. It would have offered the Arabs in the region peace, self determination, a state of their own. And they said no? The ones who didn’t want to move would not have needed to move. This was explicitly outlined in many historical documents and you refuse to believe it because it’s inconvenient to your bullshit narrative.
English
1
0
0
17
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok Haha please. Now the claim is that Israel was committed to living up to international scrutiny? Last I checked they call most (all?) of those institutions illegitimate. He’s also not the only one of course. There are many examples of key early zionists demanding expulsion.
English
1
0
0
15
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
I actually think your argument is many orders of magnitude more ridiculous. A private letter written a decade earlier shows what he was willing to consider in a hypothetical 1937 partition plan. A founding document shows what he committed to when actually creating a state under international scrutiny. Those aren’t the same thing.
English
1
0
0
13
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit @grok And yeah - if you propose a land deal to the people who live there. And they decline. And you say, we’re proceeding anyway… that’s a declaration of war! You don’t get to say they refused to be peaceful lol. Offer them a better deal and they might say yes!
English
1
0
0
15
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
Jews were 33% of the population and offered 55% of the land in partition. The partition stipulated a Jewish state and an Arab state. It did not stipulate anyone needed to be displaced. Arabs living o ln the land designated for Israel were more than welcome to stay and become citizens of Israel. Your entire argument is that this pretty benign percentage discrepancy justifies the decades of rejectionism and war perpetuated by the Arab population since 1947?? There was plenty of land for everyone. If I’ve never had a cookie in my life and I get offered 45% of a cookie - I’m gonna take. I’m not gonna bitch and whine about someone else getting more. It’s not “fair”? TOUGH. Plenty of things haven’t been fair in history and people find a way to make the best of it. Not wage eternal war forever.
English
2
0
0
23
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit They rejected the partition plan, which bizarrely would have given 1/3 of the population more than half of the land, yet it was imposed on them anyway. Declaring that the land will be taken by force against the wishes of the current population is indeed starting a war.
English
1
0
0
15
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
No, not a synagogue, moron. Its historical record. Mass expulsions of the population did not occur until AFTER the Arabs started a war in November 1947 literally the day after they rejected partition. This was the catalyst of a decades long cycle of rejectionism and starting wars.
English
1
0
0
20
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit I wonder where you learned this history. Was it a synagogue by chance? Because the rest of the world laughs at the idea that the nakba was caused by Arabs. Haganah and Irgun were doing mass expulsions long before any Arab nations tried to step in.
English
1
0
0
18
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
You can share all the clips you’d like of disgusting individuals. I don’t see how it’s relevant that there are some Jews who are not good people. That’s a myopic perspective. The point is, it wasn’t the cause. The Nakba itself was the effect of Arabs starting a war. The fat that some of the soldiers in that war were war criminals is a moot point. War criminals exist in every war. You’re inverting cause and effect again.
English
1
0
0
22
Danielle Liat
Danielle Liat@danielle_liat·
@ModernHerm @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit You’re confused again. Ben Gvir is not on my side of the argument. We are ideologically opposed. I would think my earlier comments about him would have made that clear. But after you reposted a literal Nazi, I understand your impulse to pretend like I support this guy 👍
English
1
0
0
18
Hermes
Hermes@ModernHerm·
@danielle_liat @PaddyTheFitzer @kinzel_john @RBPundit All of Israel’s ongoing expansion. You say their neighbors shouldn’t be allowed to defend themselves militarily from literal invasions. They have to just accept whatever meager scrap of land Israel lets them hang on to and say thank you, until eventually they take it all.
English
1
0
0
16