Neo Acadia Project

1.5K posts

Neo Acadia Project banner
Neo Acadia Project

Neo Acadia Project

@Ne0Acadia

Radical freedom for Canada | Government IS Slavery

People's Republic of Canada Beigetreten Aralık 2025
20 Folgt22 Follower
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Capitalism is slavery
English
241
91
490
37.4K
Kelly
Kelly@broadwaybabyto·
We could end poverty, homelessness and food insecurity tomorrow if we wanted to. It’s a political choice to spend tax dollars on wars, ICE and corporate greed instead of helping the majority of people. Tax the billionaires. Take care of everyone else.
English
47
198
472
3.1K
Neo Acadia Project
Neo Acadia Project@Ne0Acadia·
@OrcinusWasHere @liquid2ulu Still don't get it. Your presuppositions in every single point of this post & interaction says everything anyone needs to know about you. Go touch some grass.
English
1
0
0
7
Kyle Davis
Kyle Davis@OrcinusWasHere·
@Ne0Acadia @liquid2ulu "The guy who gave sources for all of his arguments directly from Hoppe is the one that doesn't read" -Hoppeans who have never read anything, even Hoppe
English
1
0
0
14
Kyle Davis
Kyle Davis@OrcinusWasHere·
A non-libertarian is no longer a distinguished fellow at a libertarian institute. No tears shed. The idea that because he was part of the late Rothbard nonsense means he's libertarian is similarly silly. As is the idea that Lew Rockwell's even on the libertarian spectrum. Hoppe's your typical post-Marxist tankie with views that are all about how monarchy is the only way and is natural, but "people agree on the monarch, but without Democracy, but also without warlords." If the monarch cares for the state and its people because they're his property, then you're saying that the people are his property. Hoppe can go live in his covenant communist bullshit forever and have his own publications continue wherever he'd like Hoppe doesn't believe in the fundamental libertarian concept of self-authorship. His arguments for "physical removal" are not just distasteful but fully antithetical to libertarianism. He does NOT describe voluntary association but, instead, forceful disassociation. That is a direct attack on self-authorship. He is stating that people should be (and argues that they MUST be) pre-judged and based on identities and beliefs rather than on any actual action. That is assigning a moral status to groups of people just for their existence. That is *despicable.* In Democracy, Hoppe literally argues that monarchies, especially hereditary monarchies, rule better than democracies because of their ownership of the state meaning they have a reason to care for their property. The problem, again, is that is antithetical to libertarianism. Monarchs don't just own the land but also the people of their country. The People are subjects. Those people's self-authorship; their choices, decisions, and property ownership; are held only by the whims of a tyrant. That is wholly and inherently disgusting. Hoppe's own argumentation ethics framework fails him, as well. He built on Habermas's work (which is hilarious for someone who's SO against CRT) and he claims that his work shows that self-ownership (the instantaneous simplification of self-authorship) is presupposed in any rational discourse. If that's the case? Then every person capable of argumentation has INVIOLABLE SELF-AUTHORSHIP, which includes the Democrats, homosexuals, and anyone else he wants physically removed. The framework would lead to radical universalism. Hoppe twists that argument to apply to property rights instead of people, because he's a social conservative hack. He then applies the paleo"libertarian" (paleoconservative) strategy, which is inherently authoritarian. The entire point is to abuse the libertarian movement as a vehicle for exclusionism; he wants his social conservative views to be FORCED upon people by bringing the Republicans into the Libertarian spaces. This is the same reason that hardcore Hoppean founders of the Mises Caucus, MiTox folks like Michael Heise, have no problem with the removal of long-time Libertarians from this party. They are fine stealing the property of those of us who built this party and replacing us with Republicans due to their lack of understanding of their own nigh-theological belief in property rights. The MiTox concept is to destroy the liberty movement and replace it with one that they like involving reactionary conservatism. The problem with that? Conservatism is right-wing bullshit. Libertarians are not, nor have we ever been, reactionaries. Hoppe's bullshit is the "bridge" to the alt-right from Libertarianism, which is recognized even by people like George Hawley. Hoppe is for feudalism hidden behind a veneer of "freedom." His "freedom" is for the "property owners," which exclusively means landowners. He's rebelled against Marxism on the grounds that he believes hierarchy is good, classes are inherent, and that there are people who should not be part of society. He hides that behind Austrian economic citations while fundamentally opposing the core beliefs of the rest of the Austrian school of economics (which is, once again, why basing your political philosophy on a mathematical model of economies is absolutely useless). This is not some mischaracterization for a personal attack on the man. He OPENLY prefers the "ancien régime." Hoppe treats self-authorship as something that is conditional; something to be be earned by the purchase of land. Self-authorship is the precondition for self-ownership. Therefore, ownership cannot be a requisite for authorship. Hoppe proved his entire philosophy wrong and then has continued to scream that it's the only way forward. No one can define your self-authorship for you. Hoppe's bullshit tries to pretend that, if you don't adhere to his ideas? Then you are not deserving of your self-authorship. As Horwitz put it, the approach is, "a fascist fist in a libertarian glove."
English
23
3
24
5.2K
Jake
Jake@Nasdad_TO·
Canadians who want high-speed rail don’t care whether it’s built in Eastern Canada or Western Canada. We just want great things built in this country again. 🇨🇦
Jake tweet media
English
1.1K
252
1.9K
83.1K
Ned Stark
Ned Stark@FantasyWorldW1·
Star Wars actor John Boyega explained why he doesn’t watch Lord of the Rings or Game of Thrones in 2017: “There are no Black people in Game of Thrones,” he said. “You don’t see one Black person in Lord of the Rings. I ain’t paying money to always see one type of person on-screen. Thoughts?
Ned Stark tweet media
English
7.4K
179
2.2K
4.7M
Lewis Miles
Lewis Miles@Maga4liberty·
What do you think about taxing billionaires at a higher percentage rate???
Lewis Miles tweet media
English
3.5K
668
2.5K
79.5K
Kevin
Kevin@kevishie·
@even_steven8tht What do you think the quality of a government run / subsidized daycare is? You putting your kids in that? They’ll pay so little it’ll attract daycare staff that don’t care about your kids. Anything government ran is shit.
English
5
0
2
1.3K
S
S@even_steven8tht·
America is such a fascinating place because this man is providing a service that actually materially benefits people, arguably what the government is designed to do, and you will still see articles upon articles trying to convince you he’s actually doing a bad thing.
@

NYC Mayor Mamdani announces free childcare center for government workers:"We never want city workers to have to choose between a job that they love and raising their kids in the city they call home."

English
3.4K
17.6K
121.7K
2.8M
Scott Santens
Scott Santens@scottsantens·
If I lost a brain cell every time I saw someone claim that Universal Basic Income was communism, I'd have become stupid enough to say it myself. AI is here. Jobs are being automated. And capitalism requires consumers with money to spend. Consider where this is going without UBI.
Scott Santens tweet media
English
721
93
462
24.5K