Needham Ag Technologies LLC

44 posts

Needham Ag Technologies LLC banner
Needham Ag Technologies LLC

Needham Ag Technologies LLC

@NeedhamAgTech

Provider of agronomy services plus supplier of sprayer, planter, air-seeder and drill parts.

Kentucky, USA Beigetreten Temmuz 2019
112 Folgt375 Follower
Needham Ag Technologies LLC retweetet
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦@Farmer_Tom_UK·
“Residue management is the difference between a good farmer and a bad farmer” Phil Needham speaking at #NNTC26
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
7
6
58
28.3K
Needham Ag Technologies LLC retweetet
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦@Farmer_Tom_UK·
Great reminder. Chopper blades are net zero cost as blunt knives take more fuel.
Farmer Tom 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
2
1
9
1.6K
Gavin Spoor
Gavin Spoor@gavin_spoor·
What do you topdress your wheat with? 3 hole, 7 hole, Chafer bars, dry fertilizer Chafer bars are 3.5x the cost of 3 streams, are they worth it?
Gavin Spoor tweet mediaGavin Spoor tweet mediaGavin Spoor tweet mediaGavin Spoor tweet media
English
56
5
95
34.2K
Needham Ag Technologies LLC
Needham Ag Technologies LLC@NeedhamAgTech·
@iamyourfarmer @Garretgraham007 See the independent replicated small plot data below from Wheat Tech, they are a wheat consulting and research company who doesn’t sell stream bars. These are averages from 4 years of replicated trials. The 3 hole nozzles are horribly height dependent and often streak wheat.
Needham Ag Technologies LLC tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
adam baldwin
adam baldwin@iamyourfarmer·
@Garretgraham007 @NeedhamAgTech Why not use a 3 hole in the study? Or was it and the data not published? Because on the theory of leaf burn 7 is more than 4 but 4 is more than 3. Coming from the seed side, people don’t publish the plots they lose. Do you have independent 3rd party studies?
English
2
0
0
32
Needham Ag Technologies LLC
Needham Ag Technologies LLC@NeedhamAgTech·
@iamyourfarmer @Garretgraham007 The 3 hole nozzles are horribly height dependent and they often streak the wheat as a result. The replicated data I posted below was independent. Here is more replicated research below from Wheat Tech, a wheat consulting and research company. It’s 4 years of replicated trials.
Needham Ag Technologies LLC tweet media
English
0
0
0
19
Garret
Garret@Garretgraham007·
@NeedhamAgTech What is the LSD? Is that a statistical difference between 7 stream and chaffer?
English
3
0
0
30
Needham Ag Technologies LLC
Needham Ag Technologies LLC@NeedhamAgTech·
Big differences this year between phos banded with the wheat seed, compared to the same products (and rates) surface broadcast. In this replicated trial, wheat was notilled into corn residue with 100 lb MESZ in the treatment on the L of center, compared to 100 lb MESZ on R.
Needham Ag Technologies LLC tweet mediaNeedham Ag Technologies LLC tweet media
English
3
1
15
4.8K
Needham Ag Technologies LLC
Needham Ag Technologies LLC@NeedhamAgTech·
@ChrisJPelzer If you look at some of the data, it suggests that the lower the STP levels - the greater the response to banded P (compared to broadcast). But my experiences lead me to believe if it’s heavy residue notill conditions, we always seem to see a similar response regardless to STP.
English
0
0
2
115
Chris
Chris@ChrisJPelzer·
@NeedhamAgTech Is there a good handle on optimizing the wheat seed + P response? In other words, if soil test P is “Y”, an economic response to winter wheat is expected at “X” amount of in-furrow P? Curious how this response varies with background soil fertility levels for VR applications.
English
1
0
1
160
Needham Ag Technologies LLC retweetet
Sask Wheat
Sask Wheat@SaskWheat·
Huge thank you to everyone who came out to our Semi-Annual! We hope everyone enjoyed their time with us and our keynote speaker, Phil Needham! Here's some highlights👇🏼
Sask Wheat tweet mediaSask Wheat tweet mediaSask Wheat tweet mediaSask Wheat tweet media
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 🇨🇦 English
1
3
9
3.1K