Pale Landing

The Charlie Kirk Show should not exist without Charlie Kirk.

Starting Thursday, we'll be updating our revenue sharing incentives to better reward the content we want on X: We will be giving more weight to impressions from your home region—to encourage content that resonates with people in your country, in neighboring countries and people who speak your language. While we appreciate everyone's opinion on American politics, we hope this will disincentivize gaming the attention of US or Japanese accounts and instead, drive diverse conversations on the platform. We invite creators to start building an audience locally. X will be a much richer community when there's relevant posts for people in all parts of the world.

For the record... on the day we released the website, our second follower 'accused' us of being John Mappin. Since then, we have been Candace Owens, the FBI, a CIA psyop, 'working for TPUSA', CCP/Qatar funded, Ian Carroll, George Farmer and probably a few others. It's impossible to prove a negative, but we can confirm that we are none of those people or groups, nor do we represent any of them, nor have we met any of them (we have spoken to John Mappin and can confirm he seems to be a very decent man genuinely seeking the truth). As we say on the website we are a small team, not one person. Over the months people occasionally 'discover' that X believes our account was registered in Switzerland. None of us have ever been to Switzerland. But we all know how to use a VPN. We were not all born in the USA. But we do all believe that the assassination of Charlie Kirk is perhaps the most consequential global event of our generation. Look at the world. American politics IS global politics. Charlie Kirk sat at the heart of American power, and was probably the best chance we had at avoiding a new war in the Middle East. Power wielded for good or for ill affects us all. America is the centre of the global power structure. America is the home of the military industrial complex. Not only Americans are affected by American wars and American weapons and American banks. None of us are Russian, Ukrainian, Palestinian, Iranian, Lebanese, or Israeli. But what's going on in all of those places is significant and still matters. And all of us have paid taxes which pay for the bombs flying over and onto these places and their people. For those with the boring accusation of us profiteering: we don't monetize our X account, our site (used by tens of thousands of people) is totally free to use and has no adverts and no sponsors. We have made precisely zero dimes (or whatever it is they have in Switzerland) from this entire project which we all do in our spare time because we think it matters. Why are we anon? We are all advocates of privacy and freedom above all else and this project is not about us as a group or any of us as individuals. It's about showcasing all the work that is being done to get to the truth. And if we can help with that in some way then we feel like we have done something worthwhile. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER.

I feel compelled to share some insight on the shot/bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. I hate to wade into this conversation, but some sanity is necessary - seeing all the insane BS that’s out there. I’m a lifelong hunter and have shot at least 75+ deer with a 30-06, and countless more with other rounds, as well as bow and arrow. I guided hunting trips full-time for a decade. I have personally seen literally hundreds if not thousands of “kill shots” with high powered rifles. And in this line of work, I studied ballistics, bullet performance, etc. I guarantee I have more first-hand knowledge than pretty much every single “influencer” out there who is presenting themselves now as an expert in this. Two key points: - First, bullets do inexplicable things. Yes, they always obey the laws of physics (no “magic”) but there are just so many variables that an outcome in a dynamic situation is simply not predictable within the range of possibilities. - Second, yes it is quite possible that a 30-06 round (with a soft-point, lead-filled bullet, designed for expansion, as is the case here) would NOT make an exit wound. AND it is possible without a significant amount of external blood loss. I once shot a deer in the head at about 100 yards with a 30-06, and there was no exit. The skin on a deer’s head is thin compared to a human neck, and the cumulative bone-mass on the bullet’s trajectory much less than a human spine. I was baffled about this (must be magic!) until I figured it out. What happened is that (a slow-mo video would have revealed) the head instantly inflated like a balloon, and the insides turned to mush. That’s how it absorbed the bullet’s energy. It looked normal on the outside when I went to retrieve it, but on inspection it was obvious. And there was minimal blood loss (b’c the only hole was 3/10’s of an inch - ie, 30 caliber, as in 30-06 - and the skin closed around it as it sprang back after the shot). In the sickening video of Charlie’s assassination, there is a freeze-frame where his neck did the same thing — blew up (momentarily) like a balloon before springing back. That’s where the energy went. Not rocket science. Combined with a healthy spine (higher on the bone density scale, we are told), the thickness of skin and density of muscles in a human neck, the story we are being told is 100% plausible. I’m not saying I know what happened. Only that the folks saying this is not possible have no idea what they’re talking about, and by spewing this ignorant crap, they are only making things worse. If you are prone to be influenced by such ignorant conspiratorial information, please understand the context: fact is, “influencers” make their money by peddling their influence. Unethical ones do so to the highest bidder. Others have hidden agendas/biases that taint their content. Some are just batshit crazy. Some sow division on purpose, and fling out all kinds of crazy crap, just to stir the pot - to get clicks. Psyops from myriad powers shape our social media. Generating deepfake videos is easy as logging into Grok. It’s not rocket science to gin up a “following” and appear “credible” and “sincere.” The point is, you should not wholesale believe or even give a smidge of credibility to ANYONE you don’t personally know. And even then you have to be careful. The devil knows the more he tries to oppress revival from the outside, the more it breaks out. So the way to defeat it is to divide and conquer, through lies and deception that appear as truth. “The devil comes masquerading as an angel of light.” Be smarter.