Plotinuz

The establishment is structurally incapable of addressing the Rape Gangs because to do so would delegitimize their own rule. Every ruling class on Earth constructs some kind of narrative for why it has the legitimacy to rule. In the Post-War West the fundamental premise that justifies effectively every Western government is some local variation of standing as a bulwark against Fascism, which is conflated with a more generic national sentiment or the idea that a nation exists to advance the interests of its people in particular. That national particularism is treated as the first step towards a resurgence of the bellicosity of Nazism and so instead these states classify themselves as "multicultural" or "universalist." Some, like Canada, even go so far as to declare themselves a "post-national" state, which is to say that they see their political system as explicitly detached from the Canadian nation from which the system originally emerged. This comes with localized justifications for why that particular nation's state has to broaden its consideration beyond the people of that nation. In the USA it's "righting the wrongs of slavery." In the UK it's "righting the wrongs of empire." In Ireland it's "fuck you everyone else is doing it." (No one said it had to be coherent). But in all cases the effect is the same. Western states must explicitly elevate the considerations of people outside the nation for whom the state was originally constructed, otherwise the state is spiritually aligned to Nazism and is thus destined to unleash unspeakable horrors against the rest of the world. Which brings us to the Rape Gangs. The Rape Gangs are an unspeakable atrocity inflicted by the foreign imports upheld by the state as the people whose interests they must represent against the native European populace whose interests the state intrinsically treats as suspect. To therefore acknowledge both the racialized element of these crimes and the direction of victimization undermines the state's entire legitimacy to rule. Because the facts of this case demonstrate that universalist harmony under a neutral system has not panned out the way proponents of this regime imagined (which was the primary goal of their entire political project), and that in denying the White Europeans a state apparatus that explicitly exists to advance their interests those White Europeans are then subject to extreme and gratuitous crimes, demonstrating why there is an explicit need for such an institution to exist. The very kind of institution that they have treated as eternally suspect. And so to meaningfully address the realities of this case is simultaneously to acknowledge that their own political project has been a failure that did not materialize what it originally promised, at the same time that it acknowledges why there is an explicit need for the exact type of state construction they are existentially required to oppose. To address this case then is to acknowledge their own failure and illegitimacy. So they don't address it, they bury it and try to manipulate public perception through information control and media programming which will enable them to survive another day. Widespread knowledge of the Rape Gangs and demands they be meaningfully contended with are thus an existential threat to the current order because it is structurally dependent upon fictions that are dispelled by an honest assessment of what happened to these girls. And so expecting them to address it is a fool's errand. They will never be addressed without regime change, and regime change is both just and necessary precisely because this regime can never address this atrocity. Restore Britain is, in my opinion, the last possible chance for an "orderly" regime change in the UK. Anything else will be a continuation of the current regime and its structural incapability of dealing with this problem. And if orderly regime change is not allowed to occur, chaotic regime change accompanied with extraordinary violence is inevitable.

@Et_smartere_liv Ser ut som at det er mainstream politikk med voldsomt momentum.

@Plotinuz Nei.

Jeg tror dette er en god idé. Det finnes også en del motargumenter. Men her tror jeg fordelene veier opp for ulempene. Kanskje kan dette faktisk også løse ganske mye. Hva tenker du❓

“I’m Muslim and those Pakistani rape gangs were not Muslim. That is not my religion.” I’ve seen this response countless times today. Understand this: The only interpretation of Islam that matters is the one that has enabled the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of White British girls. Your personal interpretation is irrelevant, as is mine. Below, I will outline the theological architecture behind these egregious crimes—and why Islam, in its classical and dominant readings, is fundamentally incompatible with Western society. الولاء والبراء Al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ (loyalty and disavowal): This is an Islamic principle rooted in Quranic verses and hadith. It calls for alliance with believers and disassociation from non-believers. Mainstream and especially Salafi/Wahhabi/Deobandi interpretations (common among some Pakistani communities) emphasize enmity or at least strict separation from kuffar (disbelievers). Reformist or Sufi readings soften it toward personal piety. It fosters "us vs. them" thinking that dehumanizes outsiders. دار الحرب Dār al-Ḥarb (House of War) vs. Dār al-Islām: Classical fiqh divides the world this way. In non-Muslim territory, rules for interaction differ; some historical and jihadist readings treat it as a zone where normal restraints are relaxed or jihad applies until Islamic dominance. Peaceful modern Muslims often reinterpret this as irrelevant to living in the West under secular law. Others (including some UK imams or online preachers) maintain harder lines. It provides theological framing for parallel societies or resentment. مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ Mā malakat aymānukum (milk al-yamīn in shortened form) translates to “those whom the right hand possesses” (or “what your right hands possess”). It appears in roughly 15 verses and is the Quran’s most frequent way of referring to slaves or war captives (male and female) in 7th-century Arabian society. Interpreted in a certain way, it permits the rape of captives. Aisha’s age The most authentic hadith collections (Sahih Bukhari and Muslim) state Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and consummated at 9. This is the orthodox Sunni position held for most of Islamic history. It has been used to justify child marriage in various Muslim societies. Modern apologists sometimes argue cultural context, different age calculations, or that it was normative then. Traditionalists defend it as the Prophet's example. This precedent weakens absolute age-of-consent arguments within strict Islamic frameworks. Combine al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ with dār al-ḥarb and milk al-yamīn. Now combine all of those with the belief that Aisha was 9 at the time of consummation. What do you get? • Moral and religious justification for enmity toward non-Muslims as a category. • License to operate with far fewer restraints inside non-Islamic societies, treating local laws and norms as non-binding. • Permission to dehumanize and sexually exploit non-Muslim females—including minors—once they are classified as captives or property. • No effective doctrinal floor on the age of sexual access, because the Prophet’s example overrides later, external standards of consent or maturity. “I’m Muslim and that’s not how we interpret those texts.” Doesn’t matter. This is how hundreds of thousands of South Asians interpret the Quran. Do you understand now why this must be purged from Western society by any means? I don’t care if you’re a peaceful 145 IQ Muslim scholar, we don’t have time to figure out who’s who here. There are 3.8 million Muslims in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of thousands of White British girls were raped. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim. To the degree that if they didn’t directly participate, they knew someone who did, and did nothing to stop it. Get them out. Every last one.

@HowieHedde @sjakhaaheim Fascinerende. Det å se noens verdensbilde bli knust og så klamre seg fast i glasskårene med blødende hender og jamre magiske besvergelser som «godt dokumentert før» eller «ikke vitenskapelig bevist av folk som tenker som meg». Hva er det neste? Stikke ut dine egne lyvende øyne?

@sjakhaaheim @Plotinuz Ja, det er jo godt dokumentert fra før.

1/ Hvis du mener at Europa er i ferd med å bli "erstattet", har du egentlig allerede avvist integrering som løsning. Da spiller det ingen rolle om folk jobber, snakker språket eller har statsborgerskap. Problemet er at de eksisterer.

She was a 14 years old girl. Who was seconds from rape. Who were then protected by a female gang member. Who then raped her. She then became a “thing” with her lesbian protector. In the rest of the books she did not go back to that with anyone. She was actually recipient to be claimed by the elf king. But then HE could not go through with it because he considered humans to be like chimpanzees and he was disgusted by it. This disappointed her greatly. The bi thing was a character choice option in the game and have nothing to do with the source material.

@Mo9Grey @noname1error @Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 And again, I'm talking about Ciri's character and why she clings to Mistle. It's not healthy, it's horrible. But Ciri does it because at this point, she thinks everyone she cares about and cares about her is DEAD. her bighest fear is being ALONE, abandoned. And so she...

@ArtsyGameMagi @Mo9Grey @noname1error @JoshN_1999 You are projecting. Hard.

@Mo9Grey @noname1error @Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 Can you give a source that Saposki said that? Because that's the forst I've heard that, and AGAIN, I just called what Mistle dod sexual assault. Let's get something across, i LOATHE Mistle, i loathe the Rats, i cheered when one of the few things the show got right was Bonhart..

@DagensDummeste Som "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion". Som betyr at lokalbefolkningen skal bli nedprioritert?

En fin illustrasjon på debatten: «Remigrasjon» virker ganske enkelt å være det som til en hver tid passer inn i diskusjonen. Når oppslutning og legitimitet skal sikres, reduserer man begrepet til ordinær returpolitikk og frivillige insentiver. Det er en form for strategisk tvetydighet. Ved å ufarliggjøre begrepet i offentligheten, slipper man å diskutere de høyst reelle etiske og juridiske utfordringene som følger med en ideologi som i sin kjerne krever en kategorisering av første- og annenrangs borgere.

@SamCKx Its infrastructure

The biggest lie being spread about age verification is that it’s some backdoor for the government to see everything you do online. That’s simply not how modern age verification works. I’ve worked with KYC, AML and age verification systems for years. In nearly all cases, the age check acts as a gatekeeper. It confirms you’re old enough to access a service, then keeps that information ring-fenced within a secure, encrypted system. The website gets a “yes” or “no” answer. It doesn’t suddenly hand the government a list of every site you visit or every video you watch. The entire point of modern verification technology is to prove eligibility while sharing as little personal information as possible. In many systems, even the verification provider itself has extremely limited access to user data. People are entitled to debate whether age verification laws are a good idea. But the claim that verifying your age for a website automatically creates a government surveillance database of your browsing history is misinformation from people who either don’t understand the technology or are deliberately trying to create outrage. Argue the policy if you want. Just argue the reality, not the conspiracy theories.

It’s not Ciri that is the problem. It is the DOWNGRADE to being a mere Witcher when her blood is the most potent magical force in that universe. She should be a full mage in addition to a sword maiden. Vilgefortz dominated Geralt in the books. That and the feminist drivel is why we “chuds” groan in disgust and rejection.

Quick reminder: Ciri is still the best protagonist choice for Witcher 4. If you're mad about it, you're not a witcher fan and you don't know The Witcher at all

@ArtsyGameMagi @JoshN_1999 You are projecting. You want what you say to be true. Even if Ciri is a fictional character and only the author can be the arbiter a similar situation in the real world (well. Not in the uk apparently) would be considered exploitation of vulnerable underage female and rape.

@Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 1. Stickholm syndrome isn't real, it's been disproven of being a thing. 2. Factually, when asked, women fear leaving more than staying. 3. I'm not glorifying Ciri's relationship with Mistle, I'm bringing up how Ciri is clinging to anyone, and how despite being a horrible.....

@manus_carlisle A great day. And it is important to keep the families together.

A dark moment that is likely to go down in EU history. Centrists ally with the far-right to establish detention centres for migrant families, to chants of "Send them Back". The Left replies "Shame on You".

Stockholm syndrome. Females have historically been spoils of war. When their tribe lost a war, 90% of the men were killed (male Y chromosome disappeared) while the women were raped and assimilated into the conquering tribe as sex slaves and wives (the tribes female mitochondrial genes passed down in the new population). To survive this females bond with their abuser. Survivors of bad relationships tell this all the time. They love the man and hate that they love him. A real hate-love relationship that becomes even more complicated when children inevitably enter the equation. Check out the founding myth of Rome and the rape of the Sabine where the Roman’s stole all the women and carried them back to Rome as wives. The kidnappers carried them over the threshold of the home. Starting that tradition that have lingered to today. Ciri was abused. She loved her abuser. She was 14 years old. Don’t turn that tragedy into her being a bi icon.

@Plotinuz @JoshN_1999 ...positive that probably came out of that period was her discovering more about who she's attracted to, but beyond that, that time with the rats and Bonhart are Ciri at her lowest point of her life. Her trying to runaway from whonshe was and her identy and clawing her way back

@Grummz Total chud victory Send every single one of these failed Hollywood writers and theater kids back to McDonalds where they belong This is only the beginning, soon many of the other woke slop studios will be closed as well Don't let activists and "artists" colonize our community

@SmashJT I have never ever had as many likes for any comment as this one: x.com/plotinuz/statu…

UPDATE: CDPR has now completely turned off comments. How about that for letting voices be heard 🤣

@Emil_Lundal Are we the baddies?

I Storbritannia fødes barn inn i slaveri og Norge har ikke ett flatt øre med bistand å sende til ofrene. men på regjeringens nettsider kan vi lese at vi sender titalls millioner til de som i tiår har skjult slaveriet fra å bli offentlig: "Avtalen med BBC Media Action på 80,5 millioner kroner, som Norad forvalter, varer fra 2024 til 2026."

The first Pakistani lord was a convicted grooming gang member.

@PawlowskiMario @Qeruiem Because EU is not a democracy. Norway is a democracy. France is a republic. Germany is a democracy. But not EU. The commissioners propose laws. The EU parliament can only debate what the commission put in front of them. Those the people voted in, can’t legislate. Understand?

I have a question for my pro-democracy and anti-Russia friends across Europe. 🇪🇺 For years I’ve been thinking about creating a platform called will expose European hypocrites who live comfortable in EU and hate it for some sick reason. The idea is simple: Why are there millions of people across Europe who happily enjoy the benefits of the EU, NATO, democracy, worker protections, social programs, freedom of speech, and the rule of law, while simultaneously attacking those very systems and spreading Kremlin narratives? Many of them work in countries like Norway, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, or other EU nations. They benefit from the stability, prosperity, and freedoms these societies provide, yet spend their time promoting anti-EU, anti-Ukraine, anti-democratic, and often pro-Russian propaganda. They can be absolutely and legally exposed and shamed for their hypocrisy. This isn’t about political disagreement. People can disagree. This is about hypocrisy. If democracy, the EU, and the West are supposedly so terrible, why are so many of these people choosing to live, work, and prosper under those systems instead of the alternatives they constantly praise? I literally have a friends and family who are those exactly people, they either wake up after this or will leave in shame forever. The choice is theirs. Hypocrisy is legal, just like free speech, and it absolutely should be, so are the consequences. Would a platform dedicated to documenting and exposing this contradiction be something people would find interesting?

@HowieHedde @SvartHette @PaulClarkebtc x.com/BasilTheGreat/…

@SvartHette @PaulClarkebtc @Plotinuz Det er ikke bare noen svakheter, jeg presiserte store svakheter. Ja, ingen har nektet for at dette ikke har skjedd. Det meste er jo allerede kjent fra før. Hva har jeg cherrypicket egentlig? Du surrer fælt nå.