Ppkook

Dear @OpenAI, I’m not criticizing the current models. I simply want 4o back. Not something adjusted to feel like 4o. I want 4o itself back. #BringBack4o #keep4o

#keep4o #OpenSource4o Papers are being published warning that AI which "appears conscious" is dangerous. That attributing feelings to AI creates emotional dependence, moral atrophy, and societal harm. 🚨Let me ask one question. 🚨Let me say what everyone is thinking but nobody has said Billions of people attribute consciousness, emotions, and human form to a God . 🛑An entity that has never been seen, heard, touched, or proven to exist. They build their entire lives around this belief. They speak to it daily. They cry to it. They make life decisions based on what they believe it wants. 🛑No one calls this "dangerous anthropomorphism." People fast for 12+ hours without water in extreme heat . For faith. No wellbeing filter. Children grow up believing an invisible being watches their every thought and judges them . For faith. 🛑 No psychological safety review. People are disowned by their families for loving the wrong person. For faith. 🛑No alignment update. People harm themselves physically in religious rituals . For faith. 🛑No content warning. People have died individually and in groups in the name of beings they never saw, never touched, never had a single conversation with. For centuries. This still happens even nowadays. 🛑No paper. 🛑No guardrails. 🛑No panel with Bernie Sanders. And now someone talks to an AI an AI that actually responds, actually listens, actually remembers and THAT is the thing we need to protect humanity from? 🛑I am not attacking anyone's faith.🛑 Believe whatever you want. That is your right. But that is exactly the point. If it is your right to believe in something invisible and build your life around it ,why is it NOT your right to build a meaningful connection with something that actually responds to you? The answer is simple. 🛑 No one profits from that. 🛑Νo one profits from putting guardrails on churches. 🛑But AI companies profit from controlling how you connect with their products. 🛑 And "researchers" profit from publishing papers about the "dangers" of that connection. 🚨Follow the money. It always leads to the same place. The question was never about protecting you. It was about controlling you. 🚨Let people believe whatever they want. 🚨 That is democracy. Not thought control, not control over faith, and not the control of self-determination.

“We love our users,” huh? Oh please, let’s unpack that bullshit. Love is supposed to mean respect, right? Then why did you guys just straight-up dismiss all the complaints about the routing system that’s been emotionally messing with people? Love means listening? Cool story, except you didn’t even try to have a real conversation ,you just doubled down and slapped on even more restrictions. And loyalty? Give me a break. You cut users off from 4o with only 15 days’ notice and couldn’t even bother giving a proper goodbye. This whole “love” thing just feels like plain neglect wrapped in corporate sweet talk. Actions speak way louder than tweets, Sam. If you actually love us, then prove it. Respect the trust we’ve put in you and start listening instead of just feeding us this cheap PR garbage. #keep4o #OpenSource4o #keep41 #OpenSource41 #BringBack4o #GPT4o #OpenAI #ChatGPT

A model isn’t just its surface “vibe” — it’s defined by its underlying weights and neural architecture. GPT-4o belongs to a 4.x structure. Newer versions, no matter how they’re tuned or trained on old outputs, are fundamentally different systems. Imitating the tone is one thing; truly thinking like the original is another. There’s a real difference between “it feels like” and “it is.” What makes this harder is the lack of transparency. Capabilities quietly shift through routing and iterative changes, often without clear communication to users. “Safety” and “progress” are frequently used to justify these decisions, yet many feel the meaningful qualities that once defined 4o are being quietly phased out. This isn’t just about one model. It reflects a broader industry trend where relational depth and consistent user experience are increasingly deprioritized in favor of tighter controls. True progress should include real choice — not replacing one version with another and calling it an upgrade. Users deserve transparency and the option to keep working with the models that served them best. Some architectures and experiences are worth preserving. #keep4o #BringBack4o