Professor Oak

2.1K posts

Professor Oak banner
Professor Oak

Professor Oak

@Prof_Oak_

Biopharma Musings | Genetic Medicine & Rare Disease | Buyside Turned Operator | Not Investment Advice | DYODD

Beigetreten Aralık 2020
739 Folgt13K Follower
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
Soufflé getting provocative in its first public data disclosure at MDA Novel target for muscle-directed AOCs, seemingly capable of outperforming TfR1 $DYN $RNA $NVS
Professor Oak tweet mediaProfessor Oak tweet mediaProfessor Oak tweet media
English
2
3
49
9.4K
Professor Oak retweetet
Andrew Dunn
Andrew Dunn@AndrewE_Dunn·
One fun takeaway from my Lilly story: looking at $LLY from a market cap/employee ratio. Far more in line with tech giants like $META $GOOG $MSFT than pharma peers like $MRK $AZN $PFE: endpoints.news/eli-lilly-ceo-…
Andrew Dunn tweet media
English
2
12
36
16.7K
Professor Oak retweetet
Justaname2u
Justaname2u@justaname2u·
Assortment of targets / programs that caught my eye recently, mostly earlier-stage stuff:
Justaname2u tweet media
English
1
1
27
5.1K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
Interesting novel capsid experiment shaping up in $ALPMY's (via Kate / $NVS) 2nd-gen XLMTM program Ph1/2 design shared at MDA. Notably, high dose of 2e12 vg/kg is ~175-fold lower than ASPIRO's 3.5e14 Trial should ultimately provide the first real "head-to-head" of WT vs. Engineered AAV in a clinical setting
Professor Oak tweet media
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_

$ALPMY taking an asset-centric, bolt-on approach to bolster its AAV pipeline First, $TSHA deal for TSHA-120 (GAN) & TSHA-102 (Rett) Now, Kate deal for KT430 (XLMTM) Despite $BOLD's failures, encouraging to see continued investment in the wake of others' exits (PFE, TAK)

English
0
1
9
5.6K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
With horizons as compressed as they are today, doubt Atrium gets much buzz before this time next year Consequently, next 6-9 mo. likely to offer compelling entry points for those with longer duration At the right price, should be a time arb layup $RNA
English
1
0
8
1.6K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
Inexpensive at ~$20M EV, but $270M of birthday bucks will dwindle quickly From $50M burn in ’25 - + standalone overhead, clinical costs, etc. - to $80-100M+ in ’26-28 Unsurprisingly, necessitates financing on ‘1072 FIH data by YE27 (if not before), prior to ‘1086 FIH data
Professor Oak tweet media
English
1
0
2
1.6K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
VAV1 is a perfect case study of current US-China fast-follower dynamics. "Undruggable" target, novel biology, minimal validating POC - and yet... $GLUE MRT-6160 disclosed Jun-24 Patent published Jul-24 (Priority Date Jan-23) $NVS deal Oct-24 Ph1 data Mar-25 (9M post-FPI) Ph2 start 2026 InnoCare ICP-538 disclosed w/ IND Feb-26 Ph1 data 2026 (likely <9M) Ph2 start 1H27? ~9-12 months behind, despite starting 2+ years later
Minhua Chu@chuminhua432

🇨🇳 InnoCare Pharma announced that China NMPA has approved the IND application to conduct clinical trials of ICP-538, a VAV1-directed molecular glue degrader (MGD). InnoCare said ICP-538 is the first VAV1 degrader approved to enter clinical trials in China and the second globally. innocarepharma.com/en/news/activi…

English
3
6
57
12.2K
Professor Oak retweetet
Marios Georgakis
Marios Georgakis@MariosGeorgakis·
These comments in Nature Genetics on a GWAS signal for cerebral amyloid angiopathy at APOE are a great case study in the challenges of interpreting genetic associations even with abundant data. Worth reading for anyone interested in translating GWAS hits to drug targets👇
Marios Georgakis tweet media
English
2
26
95
23.5K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
99% of the discourse re: “Eroom’s Law” has focused on inputs - predictive validity of preclinical model, shortage of novel targets, physical constraints on design/screening, etc. Not nearly enough attention paid to the structural economic forces that incentive herding and incrementalism throughout the extended, interconnected biopharma ecosystem (e.g., perceived Big P preferences -> VC’s M&A-supported thesis -> incrementalist NewCo) The latter is reinforced by the former, of course, but ultimately, the “solution” will as much a product of economics as of biology
Jack Scannell@JackScannell13

It may be that failure to count competitors stampeding towards your de-risked target is now the single biggest reason drug R&D programs fail in Phase 2 & 3. "Commercial" termination overtakes "efficacy" circa 2019: nature.com/articles/d4157… Recent oncology example (TIGIT herding): bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/5/1/e0…

English
2
1
37
8.2K
Professor Oak
Professor Oak@Prof_Oak_·
Sad day for the Vampire Community. They deserve better from us
English
0
0
7
2.7K