Q

584 posts

Q

Q

@Quoptikos

Reformed Covenantal Confessional Postmillenial Presbyterian

Beigetreten Nisan 2025
80 Folgt4 Follower
The Bulwark
The Bulwark@BulwarkOnline·
"I'm kind of tired of you being called pastor... you hate everybody. You attack Black people, gay people, immigrants, Jews. All you do is spread hate." @Timodc confronts controversial Christian nationalist pastor Doug Wilson on Piers Morgan Uncensored.
English
734
5.8K
30.3K
994.5K
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@_footiefetish @1776USA79 @J0YDBOY @BulwarkOnline @Timodc Saying you are a gay Christian is akin to saying you are a Christian thief, or a Christian adulterer. They are wholly incompatible. + No one is a gay *anything* - there is no gay gene. There is merely wickedness, sin, & depraved Man who gives into it to greater or lesser degrees
English
0
0
0
35
Footie Fetish
Footie Fetish@_footiefetish·
@1776USA79 @Quoptikos @J0YDBOY @BulwarkOnline @Timodc That's vile. That's insulting to millions of couples whose love and commitment isn't just about kids. My youngest is 42, and we didn't break up when they got older. There is no "if." It is a fact that it is natural, normal, and of God that some people are LGBTQ.
English
2
0
0
27
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@AdamH16105958 @J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc The very next verse is such *were* some of you - as in, no longer. The implication is anything but; it's explicit. Those who WERE those, and strive to no longer be those, are washed And sorry, it's actually super embarrassing. You thought it wasn't the new testament. Dead wrong
English
0
0
0
32
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@_footiefetish @J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc You can cope however you see fit; it invalidates not the reality that your belief puts you squarely out of lockstep with a majority of Christians over the last 1500 years It's bigotry to you. It's righteous abhorrence of evil in Orthodoxy Your labels don't mean anything anymore
English
0
0
0
19
Footie Fetish
Footie Fetish@_footiefetish·
@Quoptikos @J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc That "orthodoxy" is malarkey. Paul absolutely isn't the Son of God. The claim "all scripture is God-breathed" is, conveniently, made by Paul and is obviously wrong. The Bible never mentions homosexuality and your bigotry isn't Christian.
English
2
0
0
26
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc Lol, all it means is that you are ignorant of the history of human civilization. I could have guessed that based on your apparent typing disability. Try and wrap your mind around this one, see if the dots ever manage to connect.
Q tweet media
English
1
0
0
16
lover
lover@J0YDBOY·
@Quoptikos @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc you said “What do exist are impulses to act on things, and they are stronger in some vs others.” there is no gay spectrum, and the fact that believe there is means youre the faggot and cant accept it
English
1
0
0
15
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc Can you point to that please? I know what you said, and you are wrong. No one is gay, it is a made up identity of a wicked heart. What's funny is the part from my image seems to refer to you in a few ways. You seem to be quite the reviler. I hope you too repent before your time.
English
1
0
0
26
lover
lover@J0YDBOY·
@Quoptikos @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc bro youre the one that said youre a little bit gay 😭??? as i said bro you can be gay, its just a sin to act on it, youre not gay because of culture or because your whore mother drank too much before she had to, love yourself because God loves you too
English
1
0
0
18
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc People who base their identity on desiring to sodomize men exist, that's for sure. But that does not make anyone gay by their nature. It is shaped by culture and likely by chemical processes mixing Yes, I'm saying you seem a bit gay. It was pretty easy to guess. You have a tell.
English
1
0
0
28
lover
lover@J0YDBOY·
@Quoptikos @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc please dont be retarted, gay people exist, they exist in every species, it is not stronger in some vs others, wtf are talking about, are you saying everyone is a little gay wait are you gay? i have no attraction to another man, did you just come out as a fag bro lmao
English
1
0
0
31
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc The modern lie is that anyone is born gay. The reality is that there is no gay gene. What do exist are impulses to act on things, and they are stronger in some vs others. "Gay" folks have a tough cross to bear; they can only choose Christ by leaning on Christ, rejecting their sin
English
3
0
0
50
lover
lover@J0YDBOY·
@Quoptikos @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc being born gay isnt a sin, nothing they can do about that, its acting on it thats the sin, so unless theres a verse saying being born gay is a sin then youre still lying
English
1
0
0
31
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@HeartPondMatt @J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc Repentance means turning away from that sin. You can't turn to Christ without turning away from sin; thereby, you cannot turn to Christ if you refuse to turn from homosexual temptation. These are mutually exclusive.
English
1
0
0
14
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@_footiefetish @J0YDBOY @1776USA79 @BulwarkOnline @Timodc According to Christian Orthodoxy, Paul's words are as binding as Christ's; all scripture is god-breathed and profitable for teaching. Your line of reasoning is a tired one. Same with the translation stuff. Just own that homosexuality is frowned upon biblically. No need to rewrite
English
1
0
0
25
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@boom_boom737 @AuburnJPJ @BulwarkOnline @Timodc The view you're espousing is that of the premillennial dispensationalist eschatology. Doug is a reformed postmillennial who adheres to covenant theology, which holds to the exact opposite of what you've put forth as his position. I don't suppose you realized that before posting
English
0
0
1
33
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@OptimismOrDeath @TerriGreenUSA We got here because people stopped acknowledging that gay acts/identity IS in fact evil. It is a wicked perversion of the natural order. It is an affront to God, his design, & his commands. There it no hope until we return to seeing it for what it is. Completely evil degeneracy.
English
0
0
0
24
Determined Optimist
Determined Optimist@OptimismOrDeath·
@TerriGreenUSA I respect Jordan Peterson's openmindedness but this is too much. 1) IVF is a horrific practice once you understand it. 2) A child should never be voluntarily deprived of a mother (or a father). It's not that gay = evil. It's that children deserve to not be experimented on.
English
2
0
19
1.3K
Terri Green
Terri Green@TerriGreenUSA·
When the Daily Wire gave Rubin an entire episode to explain using IVF so he and his husband could have babies. Dave Rubin tells Jordon Peterson that he considered using his sister’s eggs before *destroying 18 embryos* to design a baby for himself and his husband. Rubin goes on to suggest the man he’s married to will be the nurturer.
Terri Green@TerriGreenUSA

“It's very unfortunate that abortion is such a big issue for everybody" — Dave Rubin Rubin used 18 embryos to have a baby. He destroyed life, rented a womb to design a baby for he and his husband. He’s not pro-life. Why is he platformed by the Daily Wire, Fox News and the Blaze?

English
40
39
581
187.9K
Frank Stec
Frank Stec@frankstec·
@EricLDaugh Sounds like a fake Catholic speaking here. Maybe those kids in the holler beat the smarts out of him. Like the VP of the US is close the Pope in terms of importance of anything. Luckily about 100 people were there to see him crash, but the Internet lives on to show his failures.
English
1
0
1
575
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JD VANCE RESPONDS TO POPE LEO: "When the Pope says that God is never on the side of those who wield the sword — there is more than a THOUSAND year tradition of Just war Theory." "In the same way that it's important for the vice president of the United States to be careful when I talk about matters of public policy, I think it's very, very important for the pope to be careful when he talks about matters of theology." "And I think that one of these issues here is that there has been — if you're going to opine on matters of theology, you've got to be careful, you've got to make sure it's anchored in the truth, and that's one of the things that I try to do, and it's certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they're Catholic or Protestant."
English
927
1.1K
6.2K
1.4M
Q
Q@Quoptikos·
@greyishpilgrim @SpeckMartyn @erichovind Grace & peace - I a chief sinner was also quick to insinuate your Easter message was tongue in cheek, my apologies. I struggle with YEC/OEC. The notion of death being here prior to Adam has serious implications that any Christian should take serious time to consider.
English
2
0
0
42
Eric Hovind
Eric Hovind@erichovind·
Six literal days. This is not a side issue. This goes straight to the foundation of the Gospel. When Frank Turek suggests Genesis may allow for long ages, and that death could have existed before sin, we need to follow that idea to its logical conclusion. Let’s walk it through. Why did Jesus rise from the dead? To conquer death. Why was He dead? Because He became the sacrifice for sin. Why is there a penalty for sin? Because the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). Death is not just part of life. It is the consequence of sin. Now here is where the common response comes in. Some will say animal death existed before the Fall, and only human death came through sin. But that does not fit what Scripture actually says. Romans 5:12 says death entered the world through sin, not just humanity. And Romans 8 makes it even clearer. The whole creation groans. The creation was subjected to futility. The creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay. This is not talking about humans alone. This is the entire created order. Before sin, creation was very good (Genesis 1:31). There was no curse. There was no bondage to decay. There was no groaning, suffering, and death as we see now. After sin, the ground is cursed (Genesis 3:17). Thorns and decay enter the world. The entire creation falls under a curse. Death, all death, is tied to the Fall. If animals were already dying, suffering, and going extinct for millions of years before Adam, then the curse did not introduce death, it just continued it. That means the world God called very good was already filled with death and suffering. That creates a much bigger problem. If death is not the result of sin across creation, then what exactly is Jesus reversing? The Gospel is not just about saving humans in isolation. It is about the restoration of all creation. Jesus came to undo what Adam did. Adam’s sin brought death, corruption, and a cursed creation. Christ’s work brings life, restoration, and a new heaven and new earth where there is no more death. If death was always here, then it is not an enemy, it is just part of God’s design. But Scripture calls death an enemy (1 Corinthians 15:26), not a tool. This matters. Because if you redefine the origin of death, you redefine the reason for the cross. And if death is not the result of sin, then the resurrection is no longer a victory over an enemy. It becomes something else entirely. This is not a minor disagreement. This is about whether the Bible’s story, from Genesis to the resurrection, actually holds together. Genesis is not just a polemic against the Egyptians. It is true history revealed by God himself. Get the beginning wrong, and the Gospel itself starts to unravel.
Frank Turek@DrFrankTurek

Six LITERAL Days of Creation?

English
87
22
103
30.8K