Angehefteter Tweet
@docmilanfar Today, with the help of my gnome friends, I finally used that piece of scrap wood I'd been saving for that special project.
English
Kurtis Maximus
3.9K posts
Kurtis Maximus
@RedsixString
Guitarist... with side gigs as engineer and creator of cool stuff
United States Beigetreten Şubat 2009
338 Folgt355 Follower
Working late doing some off-grid mining...
Kurtis Maximus@RedsixString
Maybe not everyone gets the joke? I'll lean in further... Powered by pure forest magic and a single hamster wheel, my off-grid Bitcoin mining operation is hashing at record speeds. Who needs the grid when you’ve got glow-in-the-dark vines, fairy dust, and a dream?
English
On a scale of 1-10, how well do you think your understanding of the 𝕏 algorithm is?
English
Taking the fable "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink" to the next level...
Kurtis Maximus@RedsixString
The Horse And The Pond by: Kurtis Maximus
English
@cb_doge This is objectively excellent... it could easily be seen by a million other people under the right code...
x.com/i/status/20343…
Kurtis Maximus@RedsixString
The Horse And The Pond by: Kurtis Maximus
English
The goal for the new Grok powered 𝕏 algorithm:
"It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers and if that content is intrinsically excellent, it can be seen by a lot of people. That's our goal."
English
So what's the point of the blue checkmark then. Doesn't that provide a degree of authenticity vs a bot. I have looked into it and bots still can create accounts with blue checkmark. But that seems like a problem that can and should be solved by the X team regardless of how it affects the algorithm or reach.
English
@RedsixString @grok The thinking here imo is: when the original poster replies,it automatically conferred a degree of authenticity to the reply
English
Here's your 2026 X algorithm cheat code according to @grok
☠️ Ignore st your own peril ⚠️
the exact playbook most people are missing (and why your impressions tanked).😭
That’s not a bug; it’s the symptom of an opaque system that quietly changed in January 2026.
X open-sourced the entire new recommendation engine (powered by Grok’s transformer models) and updates the code every 4 weeks. It’s no longer the old “engagement farming” game.
It’s now semantic AI that *reads every post and watches every video* to decide who sees it.
How the 2026 “For You” Feed Actually Works (3-Stage Pipeline)
1. Candidate Sourcing
Scans ~500 million tweets daily → narrows to ~1,500 candidates per user.
- 50% in-network (your follows + Real Graph)
- 50% out-of-network (SimClusters — 145,000 topic communities Grok matches you to)
New posts get a small test audience (5-15% of followers) first. No early traction? Dead in the water.😭
2. Grok-Powered Neural Ranking (the brain)
The transformer model *understands* your post’s actual meaning, originality, and tone — not just keywords. It predicts multiple outcomes:
- Will you like it? Reply? Repost? Bookmark? Spend 2+ minutes? Click the profile?
Then it combines them into one final score. Positive/constructive tone gets boosted; ragebait/combative gets throttled.
3. Heuristics + Filtering
Time decay kicks in hard (visibility halves every ~6 hours). Adds diversity so you don’t see the same account 10 times. Strips spam, duplicates, muted words, NSFW, blocks. Premium accounts get priority.
Public engagement weights
(straight from the open-sourced code):
- Like: 1×
- Repost: 20×
- Reply: 27×
- Author replies to your reply: 150×(this is the nuclear button)
- Bookmark: 10–20×
- 2+ min dwell time: 20×
- Profile click: 12–24×
Early velocity in the first 30–60 minutes decides everything. 10 thoughtful replies beat 200 passive likes every time.
Recent 2026 Upgrades You’re Probably Sleeping On
- Topic selector in For You (tap the header → pick “Technology,” “Business,” etc.). Users can literally skip ragebait now.
- Premium multiplier: 4× in-network, 2× out-of-network (median impressions 10–15× higher). Non-Premium accounts are basically invisible at scale.
- External links: 30–90% reach penalty (keep users on-platform).
- Grok now powers Explore summaries and even Following feed sorting for many users.
How to Leverage This for Explosive Reach
(The 2026 Playbook)
1. Get X Premium today:💀
non-negotiable. The algorithmic credibility boost (TweepCred) alone is worth it. Premium+ replies float to the top of threads.
2. Engineer conversations, not broadcasts
- End every post with a question or strong opinion.
- Reply to *every* comment in the first hour (activates the 150× multiplier).
- Turn replies into mini-threads. Depth beats breadth.
3. Content formula that Grok loves
- Text-first (71–100 chars for max reach, 240–259 for likes).
- Self-contained (no “thread 1/17” begging).
- Bookmark bait: frameworks, data, “save this” value.
- Native short video or image (text + visual still wins).
- 1–2 niche hashtags max. Zero external links in the main post (drop them in replies).
4. Timing & cadence
- Post 2–5 times/day max (more dilutes).
- Peak windows: Tue–Thu 8 AM–3 PM your audience’s time (use X Analytics).
- Schedule if needed — no penalty.
5. Warm the algorithm before posting
- Reply to 5–10 posts in your niche first. Signals you’re an active, high-quality account.
6. Avoid the silent killers
- External links in the main tweet
- All-caps, duplicates, hashtag spam
- Posting too fast (looks spammy)
- Low-effort “like if you agree” bait
Do this consistently for 30 days and your impressions will 5–10× (I’ve watched accounts go from 5k to 500k+ views per post using exactly these levers).
The algorithm isn’t “broken” or “hating” you : it’s just brutally honest about what creates real conversations and keeps users on the platform.
Most people still treat it like 2023 Twitter.
The winners in 2026 treat it like a Grok-powered recommendation engine that rewards depth, speed, and premium credibility.
Quick test: After reading this, what’s your new self-rating on understanding the algorithm on a scale of 1-10.
Reply with your number + one tactic you’re stealing today.
Let’s see who levels up. 🔥
(Pro tip: Bookmark this thread. Grok just told the algorithm you will.)
English
@WatcherGuru I guess it gives us more options on disliking something...
x.com/i/status/20341…
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru
English
@WatcherGuru How is that any different than just hitting the mute button
English
JUST IN: X officially starts rolling out dislike button.
English
Seriously, 1 like.
Keep in mind,
I wrote the song as original lyrics and concept.
I sing on this.
I play guitar on this.
I play harmonica on this.
I am inside the video with a real image of me.
I built the fireplace from scratch depicted in the video.
I created 100% of the images meticulously to reflect my bond with my dad and memories with him.
I assembled the images into a coherent story and added my multi mixed music tracks with me as artist, musician, mixing engineer, producer.
Yet, 1 like.
Sure. The algorithm is fine.
@elonmusk
x.com/i/status/20219…
English
Kurtis Maximus@RedsixString
'April Road' – my latest music video under my Eddie Ashwood branded alter ego (country genre as opposed to my typical classic rock with Kurtis Maximus). As Kurtis Maximus, I wrote the lyrics, laid down real guitar, harmonica, and vocals... but the final mix blends my real musician tracks with AI-generated Eddie Ashwood magic. The video? Built from Grok Imagine 1.0 clips mixed and based on my own real-world footage. It's a heartfelt ride through father-son dirt bike memories in the Spring seasonal sun—those golden days now living on in spirit. Hope it hits home. Check it out... (also on YouTube and my site). 🎸 [KurtisMaximus.com] #AprilRoad #GrokImagine #EddieAshwood #CountryMusic #KurtisMaximus #redsixstring #AI #xAI @elonmusk @Kekius_Sage @grok
QME
The moral of the story is this:
You can offer help, truth, opportunity, whatever—lay it right there—but people (or horses) have free will. They gotta choose to take it. No forcing salvation, no forcing sense into someone. It's about limits on what one person can do for another.
This version, authored by Kurtis Maximus, cranks it up a notch from the traditional fable. This isn't just stubbornness or instinct anymore; it's spite dressed up as principle. The horse doesn't refuse because the water looks bad or smells off—he refuses because he's mad. He blames the water for his friend's demise, even after being told straight up it was the friend's dumb choice to swim out too far. He clings to that blame like a lifeline, turns it into proof he's right, and lets himself rest one last time on the shore rather than admit the water wasn't the villain.
In our world right now—so divided, so dug in—this hits hard. We get led to the facts, the evidence, the clean water of reason or compromise or just plain survival. But too often we stare at it and say, "Nah, because look what 'they' did last time," or "because my side got hurt," or "because admitting this might make the other guy right." Spite wins. Righteousness feels better than living. Some choose very adverse outcomes over common sense and sound choices (i.e., drinking the water), just to stay smug and self-righteous.
The deeper moral? Stubbornness k*lls slowly, but spite k*lls fast and proud.
The original fable warns you can't force someone to help themselves. This Kurtis Maximus version warns that sometimes people won't help themselves on purpose—not out of fear or ignorance, but to punish the thing offering help. And in the end, the only one who suffers is the horse lying there, thirsty and self-satisfied, while the oasis keeps being an oasis.
English
Original Kurtis Maximus...
The Horse and the Pond Fable
Everyone's heard the fable: "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make 'em drink it."
But have you heard this one? Probably not, since I just made it up at 3:00am last night from a dream...
So it's one thing to not drink the water because you're stubborn and instinct told you to stay away. But it's quite another to not drink it out of spite.
There was once a horse that had crossed many miles through the desert. Lost and wandering, looking for an oasis, on its last leg. The horse sees a palm tree off in the distance. After walking so many miles, he follows the footprints of yet another horse in the sand. The hoofprints are barely recognizable, but he sees it's his old friend. He keeps going, getting closer to the palm tree—the only green in a sea of sand for as far as the horse's eye can see. Exhausted and dehydrated, the horse thinks, maybe I can make it. As he gets closer, he sees the mane of his horse friend floating in the middle of the water pond next to an island. The island has bales of hay on it. He realizes the pond—deep as it was—had drowned his horse friend. He hears a voice from the wind. The wind says, "Drink up, the water is clean and good, my friend." But the horse says, "How can I? Look what you did to my horse friend. You drowned and k*lled him. "The wind replies, "I did nothing but quench his thirst. He came to me exhausted and thirsty. He drank up. But then he continued to swim across the water and was too tired to make it to shore. He drowned by his own choice. You can drink from the shore right there."
The horse replies, "But you drowned my horse friend. How can I?" The wind dies down, the water calms, the sand settles, and the horse lays down for one last time. There he rests, at the shore of this great oasis. Tired and thirsty, but righteous and smug.
Convinced the water was in error.
English
@Kekius_Sage Thats why I randomly flip coins on some decisions, just to throw it off
English
What if your entire life is already written, and you’re just watching it unfold?
English
Albert Einstein did write about happiness, though not extensively in a deeply personal, introspective way about his own day-to-day emotional state. He shared philosophical thoughts on what constitutes a happy life, often in letters, notes, interviews, and writings.
One famous example is a handwritten note from 1922 (when he had just learned of his Nobel Prize). While in Tokyo, he gave it to a hotel messenger as a "tip" instead of cash. In German, it read: "A calm and modest life brings more happiness than the pursuit of success combined with constant restlessness." This note highlighted his view that simplicity and calm lead to greater fulfillment than relentless ambition. He also expressed that tying happiness to a goal (rather than people or things) sustains it better, and he wrote about ideals like goodness, beauty, and truth filling him with the "joy of living." In letters and reflections, he mentioned finding joy in music, nature, and intellectual pursuits, and he described life as something to enjoy with child-like wonder—e.g., comparing it to riding a bicycle to keep balance by moving forward.
Einstein was intensely dedicated to physics, especially during his peak creative periods (like his "miracle year" in 1905 and developing general relativity around 1915). He often worked in deep intellectual solitude, and his drive for understanding the universe was central to his identity—he once said if he weren't a physicist, he'd be a musician, and he lived daydreams in music. However, he wasn't a complete recluse or joyless workaholic.
Biographies (like Walter Isaacson's) describe him balancing work with:
Playing the violin regularly (often to relax or solve problems—he'd play late at night while pondering equations).
Sailing (he loved it, even owning a small boat later in life and finding it meditative).
Socializing with friends, traveling, and engaging in political activism.
Family time (though his relationships were complicated—two marriages, children, some strains).
He valued solitude for thinking but also enjoyed simple pleasures, humor, and a modest lifestyle. In later years at Princeton, he lived quietly, walked, sailed, and continued physics while avoiding excessive fame's distractions. Overall, a significant portion of his life (especially early-to-mid career) involved intense focus on science—"buried in formulas"—but he actively did pursue things like music and nature as essential, not optional. He seemed to find deep satisfaction in his work itself.
Having said all that, I probably would take in whatever he had to say on a long walk in nature with him, if time travel were an option. But, I don't see him as an expert on happiness nor in a position to offer advice on the topic in a meaningful way.
English
Every footage I've seen of Albert Einstein is not one of a happy man. Taking advice from extraordinarily brilliant people about happiness is not necessarily a formula to achieve happy life outcomes.
My grandma lived to be 98 and was not extraordinarily brilliant, but she was very wise, and content in life. That in turn, of all the people I've known, led to her excuding happiness and joy.
English
Albert Einstein once said, “If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”
What’s a real-life example of that?
English