
ridassssBWT
2.2K posts



Your post was the source of misinformation and misinterpretation of the fans about this "pooled accounting" system (which was never proven even true). This has caused the fans to assume that all members shared profits from their solo activities. They made false narratives out of it and throw hateful posts to other EXO members. You can literally read the quote retweets of your post and you'll see my point. That is the main reason I posted that article about EXO members themselves stating otherwise. That was a response to those false narratives and hateful posts. As for this clarification post of yours, it is also important to also disclose the facts about this case and not just one-sided statement from INB10O. “Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting. Even from this statement from INB100, it is clear that it was their personal suspicion and doubts that led them to think that there was no "proper accounting" conducted. "SUSPICION" and "DOUBT" not FACT. Then this suspicion was brought to PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES (namely Seoul Court, Supreme Court and The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) by INB100. As for the document submission order of CBX settlement data for the past 13 years, both Seoul Court and Supreme Court dismissed the case. Seoul Court: The court rejected most of their requests, saying, "The application for the document submission order in this case is sought and comprehensive by specifying the settlement data through document submission order, etc. without specifying the existence and scope of the unpaid settlement money." INB100 appealed to Supreme Court... RESULT: Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial. As for the request asking to view and register documents such as accounting books related to settlement: Seoul Court: This case application is being maintained to use this case application as a convenient way to achieve the purpose of document submission or to psychologically pressure SM." INB100 appealed to Supreme Court RESULT: Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial. As for the case of violation of Article 14, Paragraph 2 of the Popular Culture and Art Industry Development Act (obligation to disclose the accounting book). Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism: No violation by stating that "through face-to-face investigation and submitted evidence, it was confirmed that SM periodically disclosed data related to settlement to artists in accordance with exclusive contracts and the Popular Culture Industry Act". These are all actual court dismissals and facts that are important to know by the fans so they can have their objective take about this matter. I deliberately did not include statement from SM side so you can save all your "company stan" allegation to yourself. I rest my case.








📢 [READ] CBX Contract Dispute Explained: — 1. 2011 – Original Contract • Baekhyun signed a standard 7-year exclusive contract with SM Entertainment in May 2011, along with the members of EXO. The contract period was counted from the group’s first album release. • Shortly after debut, the members reportedly signed an additional 3-year extension, mainly due to overseas promotions. - The clause automatically extends the contract until the required number of albums is released. • SM Entertainment had previously received corrective measures stating that contracts should not exceed 7 years. It was introduced by Korea FTC after earlier SM contract disputes. • Including Bekhyun’s military service hiatus (which pauses the contract), his contract was expected to end in early 2024 — roughly 13 years in total. 2. Late 2022 – 5-Year Pre-Signed Extension (2024–2029) Before his original contract expired, Byun Baekhyun signed a 5-year extension (2024–2029) with SM Entertainment while still enlisted in the military. • Reported pressure: Baekhyun’s side later stated that the renewal was signed under pressure. They claimed he was singled out and told that other members would receive certain benefits only if he signed. • “Sign now, cancel later” claim: His legal team stated he was told, “Sign now; you can cancel it later before the contract activates.” At the time, about one year remained on his original contract, and he was reportedly told changes could be made before January 2024. It was implied that refusing to sign collectively could also pose risks to the group’s stability. • Revision requests: CBX’s legal representative, Lee Jae-hak, stated that contract revisions were requested eight times, but none were accepted. • Settlement data requests: Starting in March 2023, Baekhyun, along with Chen and Xiumin, requested transparent settlement data (“provision”) under their contract and the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act. • CBX stated they made multiple formal requests (commonly cited as seven), but were denied copies. • SM disputed this, stating that the data was made available for on-site inspection, but not for copying. • Termination notice: On June 1, 2023, CBX formally submitted a notice of termination for the extension contract set to begin in 2024, citing lack of settlement transparency. Presentation: canva.link/xve2k4tfj8ko9hi Full list of sources: bit.ly/CBXclarificati…



















