Svector

@ZiaErica @JackPosobiec Underrated Christmas movie: Diner

@JackPosobiec OMG You and Die Hard. Best Christmas 🎄 movie is The Godfather 1 and 2.

We all know the Die Hard/Christmas discussion but I have a question. Which movies are Easter movies?

@DanielRP83101 @CartNarcs He does it because I don't want to live in a world where parking lots are ruled by anarchy. And that's all that really matters.

@CartNarcs I don’t really get it. They stores can hire someone to gather carts so why does this guy think he needs to prevent someone from getting a job. It’s not the best but it’s a living till you can find something better.

Sadly, lazybones will seize on any side issue to deflect from their inner loserness. Magnets: CartNarcs.com

@AdrianneCurry Carrot Top's act? Yeah.... I'm right there with ya. 🫤

X was so fun for a while, but it's kinda.....getting lame. I wish it wasnt.

@CartNarcs "You insulted my piece -o- shit 25 year old Suzuki with 400,000 miles on it and running on two spacesaver spares! HOW DARE YOU, SIR!!!" 😄

@JonStewartIL You are correct. One of your deceitful MoLD allies Photoshopped the NASA logo onto an AI-generated fake and tried to fool people into believing it was a real photo. Apparently some dumb people fell for it.

These are not the same craft, sorry.

@OFCBostil Yes because it’s entire design is to repel heat rapidly. I have a thermal tile from one of these spacecraft and within moments it’s cool enough to touch bare handed.

@LynnLoera Yes, I'm familiar with it. It's an AI-generated fake. You've fallen for a deception. - HOOK - LINE - SINKER The great deceiver makes everyone a victim eventually.

@Rudbrps I am leaving you with this. I am at work so I can only respond when I am not driving!

So inspiring to become a fake astronaut and play in a movie studio! Wow that’s amazing! NOT!

@LynnLoera I read that entire text wall but didn't find an answer to my question anywhere. I am in full agreement with John 14:6, even though it's completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. Care to try again?

I’m quick to accuse those whom deceive and those who are of the world as it is written will fall For the delusions! 2 Thessalonians 2:11 You are doing exactly as it is written! I am not required to tell you where I get any of my information. All I can tell you is that there is no way off this planet without Jesus Christ! John 14:6 Please also remember the same government selling you this lie sold you the covid lie and hasn’t arrested one person on the Epstein list! M So, excuse me if you think I am going to believe the lying space story. Use your discernment! Choose wisely because if you choose wrong you never know it could be the last choice you make… the world over God….. Is it worth it??

@Th0ughtcrime2 @alexboge Sure, that'll work. It's kinda wordy, but hey... it's your forehead!

@Rudbrps @alexboge Outer space is FAKE and the earth is FLAT

Dear Deniers in my comments… YAWN 🥱 Can one of you - just ONE - ever bring something new to the table?! Or is it the same brain-dead comments, the same dumb claims, the same debunked memes, and the same pathetically misunderstood photos and videos on infinite repeat? Everything you’re typing has been explained, dismantled, and buried thousands of times. These aren’t “theories” anymore. They’re zombie conspiracies - dead on arrival, no brains left, just shambling around mindlessly repeating the same scripted lines they were programmed with. That’s why we get short with you. That’s why we roast you on sight. That’s why we point, mock and laugh at you. 
Because the second we see your comment, we already know the exact garbage you’re about to drop… and we already have the receipts that destroyed it years ago. You don’t research. 
You don’t learn. 
You just deny, ignore, and regurgitate. Welcome to the zombie apocalypse, folks. 
And the zombies are in my comment section. 🧟‍♂️

@Th0ughtcrime2 @alexboge You may as well just get a forehead tat that says you have a below average IQ.

@Rudbrps @alexboge Space is fake and gay and the earth is flat

Can I answer for myself? In my case it's because moon landing deniers and flat-earthers represent individual elements of a much larger problem, which is the overall dumbing-down of society. I understand at my core that no civilization can survive the scientific illiteracy of its members past a certain tipping point, and when grown adults don't understand things like the lack of stars in photos exposed for daylight, or how a telephone call from the president gets patched into radio comms, it's proof that we're approaching that point rapidly. tl;dr - I'm a fan of the human race and would like it to continue. I have grandchildren who are depending on that outcome.

@alexboge Why do you obsess about moonlanding deniers and flat earthers?

It isn't? Then please describe the steps you took to ascertain the photo's authenticity. Also please name the professional forensic photography expert(s) you employed, or your own professional credentials if you were the examiner. You're quick to accuse NASA's photographs of being forged, so I'm confident you were equally as critical with these.

@Rudbrps It isn’t faked.

@offerusthegreat @scritchy7 @TLCplMax Educate yourself. We're begging. youtu.be/7zFcyG8iUH4?t=…

@scritchy7 @TLCplMax Because NASA says its a real moon rock it must be real. They could tell you people anything and you would believe it.

I guess not—but the videos, photos, physical evidence, moon rocks, overwhelming consensus across scientific communities from every nation (including our geopolitical rivals), and actual records suggest the moon landings were real.

@offerusthegreat @TLCplMax No it didn't. You're a moron who can't read past the fake news headlines:

@TLCplMax That "Moon" rock proved to be petrified wood.

@Sierraton2020 @alexboge SNL is comprised of woke, Gen-Z idiots.

@alexboge x.com/i/status/20434…

The Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector (LRRR) is incontrovertible proof that Apollo 11 astronauts landed on the moon on July 20, 1969. Of course, “incontrovertible” means nothing to moon landing deniers - MoLDs - will simply wave their hands and recite the same tired script that someone else prepared for them decades ago. I will go into detail below and in a second comment (due to length), but suffice it to say that at this point, the MoLDs have already rolled their eyes and begun preparing their standard replies. Some will respond with the exact points I am about to address below - having either ignored them, failed to understand them, or chosen willful ignorance. Others will simply skip past this entirely and retreat to their other tired and familiar talking points. That is, of course, typical. But I am hoping that others will enjoy this breakdown and utter debunking of moon landing denial. TL;DR: • A precision laser retroreflector is sitting on the Moon exactly where Apollo 11 placed it • Independent observatories have been measuring returns from it for decades • The signal is fundamentally different from random surface reflections • No other nation had the capability or motive to place it there in 1969 • It’s still working today 🧵1/2 Now, Let’s walk through it fully: On July 21, 1969, Buzz Aldrin carefully placed and precisely aligned the LRRR at Tranquility Base, orienting it to face Earth. This was not a device you could simply drop or plop into place. The alignment had to be deliberate and accurate - the device had to be leveled to within 0.5 degrees of the local vertical and pointed toward Earth. Aldrin accomplished this using a gnomon - a sundial-like instrument that casts a shadow onto a leveling scale - to achieve that precision on uneven lunar regolith. The retroreflector has a very narrow field of view - it is not like a mirror that works from any angle. If it were poorly placed or misaligned, the laser beam from Earth would miss it entirely or return nothing usable. No robotic lander in 1969 possessed the dexterity to perform that kind of tilt-and-level calibration on an uneven surface. This required human hands. Before Apollo 11 left the lunar surface, the reflector was tested and confirmed operational. Since 1969, multiple independent observatories and universities around the world have been bouncing lasers off that reflector - none of them NASA operations: • McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin • Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico • Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (Grasse station), France • Haleakala Observatory, Hawaii • Matera Laser Ranging Observatory, Italy Universities and research institutions across multiple nations - all getting the same unmistakable signal from the exact same location where Buzz Aldrin placed that reflector over fifty years ago. 1/2 🧵 continues …

🧵 2/2 The objections from deniers: Objection 1: Lasers were already being bounced off the moon before Apollo 11. True. MIT did it in 1962. But there is a fundamental difference between scattering a laser off bare lunar regolith and hitting a precision retroreflector. Bouncing a laser off the lunar surface returns a weak, diffuse signal - light scattered in all directions, essentially noise. Hitting the LRRR returns a focused beam traveling back along the exact incoming path, orders of magnitude stronger. The retroreflector acts as a perfect corner cube, reflecting light back to its source with virtually no divergence. Consider the numbers. A typical lunar laser ranging pulse fires on the order of 10^17 photons at the moon. When that light scatters off bare lunar regolith, it spreads in all directions and only a vanishingly small fraction returns to Earth - often just a handful of detectable photons. In contrast, when the beam hits a retroreflector, the corner-cube geometry sends the light back along the exact path it came from, producing a return signal that is orders of magnitude stronger and, more importantly, consistent and repeatable. This is the difference between a faint, diffuse scatter and a precise optical response from a known, engineered target. No one who has worked with both signals has ever confused them. We know with absolute certainty that we are hitting a precisely engineered device sitting on the lunar surface. Objection 2: Someone else placed it there before Apollo 11. Only two entities on Earth were capable of sending anything to the moon in 1969 - the United States and the USSR. No private company, no other nation, no other government had anything close to that capability. The Soviets did achieve the first successful soft landing of any human-made object on the moon - Luna 9, on February 3, 1966. But Luna 9 was a stationary lander with no means of moving, no robotic arm, and no retroreflector technology - which the Soviets did not possess at that time. It came to rest roughly 600 kilometers from what would become Tranquility Base and stayed exactly where it landed. As for Soviet rovers - the first Soviet lunar rover, Lunokhod 1, did not reach the moon until November 1970, more than a year after Apollo 11. Meanwhile, the Soviets’ own heavy-lift rocket - the N1, their answer to the Saturn V - attempted two launches before Apollo 11, in February 1969 and July 1969. Both exploded catastrophically on or shortly after the pad. Both sides had spy satellite capability and were closely monitoring each other’s launches. There was no hiding those failures from anyone. Which brings us to the most historically absurd part of this argument. In 1966, when Luna 9 landed, the Soviets were not looking for ways to help the Americans - they were convinced they were going to beat them. The N1 was in production. The Soviet lunar program was active and aggressive. They had every reason to believe they would put a man on the moon before the Saturn V ever could. Why would a nation that fully expected to win the space race secretly cooperate with its rival, place a device on the moon for American astronauts to conveniently find, and hand the United States a victory they were racing to claim for themselves? The answer is they wouldn’t. They had no motive, no reason, and no interest in doing anything that aided the Americans. And for those who might still insist the Soviets somehow managed it anyway - both N1 rockets launched before Apollo 11 exploded catastrophically on the pad. They were literally incapable of delivering anything else to the moon prior to Apollo 11. The retroreflector is still there. It is still being ranged by independent observatories on multiple continents. The signal is still coming back. MoLDs have no credible answer for any of this.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 6 Apollo missions landed 12 men on the Moon and the LRRR is absolute proof.

@alexboge @abynorml62 .. which raises an obvious question: Why the necessity for a multi-million dollar facility to house, catalog and manage the lunar material for 50+ years, fully staffed, sterilized, guarded and climate-controlled, if it was all faked? youtu.be/7zFcyG8iUH4?t=…

@abynorml62 You’re jumping ahead :