Angehefteter Tweet
lynn🦄
80.8K posts
lynn🦄
@RunNhideee3
NM6 on the way l Onika’s archangel 🦄
Beigetreten Aralık 2021
1.2K Folgt1.2K Follower
@RunNhideee3 Ik who she is but my point still stands you shouldn’t have your lady off to the side like that regardless
English
I’m glad I don’t have a friendly nigga because shit like this would tick me off. Imagine having thee Rihanna standing waiting for you like you’re the prize while you chat it up with some Becky
PHOENIX 30BG@30bgphoenixx
Rihanna was clearly not comfortable seeing A$ap Rocky having a “good time” with a mysterious lady, her facial expressions says it all, she knows damn well black men can’t be fully trusted. 💔💔
English
@RunNhideee3 I’m tweeting in a Kai community idk why it don’t show that on my page 😂
English
@barbiemurra U full of shit bye , u forgot me loll x.com/onikasmiami/st…
English
@RunNhideee3 I knew you were gonna be late so I packaged up a nice lil steak bowl for you to take to work tomorrow don’t worry 😘💙😭
English
Won one on to the next
GIF
Document Tingz@DocumentTingz
⚖️COURT UPDATE⚖️Christopher Griffith has filed a reply accusing Stefon Diggs and his business affiliates of dragging out discovery and producing virtually nothing of substance in their Maryland civil case. In a May 4, 2026 reply brief, Griffith says that after months of delay, Diggs, SMAC Entertainment and The Sports and Entertainment Group (TSEG) are still making promises to produce documents without actually turning over the key material. According to the filing, Griffith says Diggs has followed the same pattern repeatedly, ask for more time, promise supplemented interrogatory answers and document production, then produce little or nothing meaningful. The reply claims that Diggs is now 80 days late on sworn interrogatory answers and has produced just 79 pages of documents, none of which supposedly originated from Diggs himself. Griffith also says SMAC and TSEG have made no substantive production at all under their subpoenas. The reply attacks Diggs’s interrogatory responses as facially deficient. Griffith says Diggs’s answers are packed with boilerplate objections, vague references to documents not yet produced, or bare promises to supplement later. As examples, the filing says Diggs did not meaningfully identify all devices used for relevant communications, did not properly identify his own social media posts about Griffith, and gave only thin or conclusory responses about alleged reputational and emotional-distress damages. One striking allegation in the reply is that Diggs withheld witness identities until his opposition brief. Griffith says two witnesses who were allegedly present at Diggs’s Rockville residence on the relevant night — Lindsay Dawn and Kahimi Vanzego — were not identified in prior interrogatory responses and only surfaced later in motion practice. The reply argues that witness identification does not require a protective order and should have been disclosed much earlier. Griffith also rejects Diggs’s explanation that the absence of a finalized protective order is what stalled production. The reply says many categories of information — like witness names, social media account details, security-system facts, and narrative descriptions of events — could have been produced regardless. It further notes that Griffith himself produced sensitive documents without waiting for a formal protective order, arguing that Diggs is using confidentiality as a delay tactic rather than a real obstacle. On the scope fight, Griffith says he is entitled to look at a longer financial history to test Diggs’s claimed reputational and endorsement damages, and also argues he should be allowed discovery into prior alleged misconduct because it could bear on truth defenses, damages, and Diggs’s preexisting reputation before Griffith’s statements were made. FULL DOCUMENT BELOW👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 CHRIS REPLY - drive.google.com/file/d/1QurSZI…
English