reason/sanity

4.3K posts

reason/sanity

reason/sanity

@SanityReason

Beigetreten Eylül 2011
1.8K Folgt85 Follower
reason/sanity retweetet
Handre
Handre@Handre·
Ayn Rand's most important lesson: Production comes before distribution. You cannot divide a pie nobody baked. Every politician inverts that order. They argue over who gets what slice, how to tax the baker, how to redistribute the flour, as if the loaf simply materialized like manna. Rand called this out for what it is. Wealth is created by specific people doing specific things: Hank Rearden smelting metal, John Galt building a motor. Take those people away and you're left with committees drafting memos about fairness while the lights go dark. The entrepreneur is not a parasite skimming off labor. He directs scarce resources toward their most urgent uses, and he eats the loss when he guesses wrong. No bureaucrat carries that risk. This is what Ludwig von Mises spent his career proving in denser prose. Rand's villains aren't cartoon capitalists. They're the moochers who demand the moral sanction of their victims: the industrialist who lobbies for a subsidy, the intellectual who calls envy "social justice." She hated the crony as much as the commissar.
Handre tweet media
English
148
1.3K
3.4K
56K
reason/sanity retweetet
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: President Trump and AG Todd Blanche's DOJ just told the International Criminal Court (ICC) to SCREW OFF, they have NO authority in the US and America will NOT cooperate with "ANY" ICC investigations Perfect timing for America 250 and July 4th 🔥 Globalists have NO POWER here 🇺🇸
English
761
4.6K
19.7K
559.2K
reason/sanity retweetet
Azat
Azat@AzatAlsalim·
Pastor has his church and home burned down by islamist mobs in Nigeria, they slaughtered 150 of his congregation. No protests for Christians in Nigeria! The UN remains silent!
English
451
12K
24.8K
167.9K
reason/sanity retweetet
Kim "Katie" USA
Kim "Katie" USA@KimKatieUSA·
Breaking: After 6 people were shot dead in Germany on June 29, 2026, it's finally being reported that the gunman, Fatih Gazioglu, is a PEDOPHILE prison escapee and a Muslim.
English
1.3K
21.7K
88.6K
1.9M
reason/sanity retweetet
James J. Marlow
James J. Marlow@James_J_Marlow·
One thousand days ago these savages invaded Israel and killed anything they saw and fired RPGs at ambulances.
English
893
3.3K
15.5K
2.6M
reason/sanity retweetet
Creative Deduction
Creative Deduction@CreativeDeduct·
Civilisations rarely collapse because they are conquered. They collapse because they lose the will to defend themselves. That was James Burnham's warning in Suicide of the West. In his 1964 book, Burnham argued that the West was not primarily threatened by external enemies or economic failure. It was being destroyed from within by its own dominant ideology - what he called liberalism. In Burnham’s usage, liberalism was not simply support for free markets or limited government. It was a broader worldview characterised by universalism, egalitarianism and a deep reluctance to assert power or defend Western civilisation as superior to others. According to Burnham, this ideology had produced a profound loss of confidence. Western elites increasingly viewed their own civilisation through a lens of guilt and criticism, while treating non-Western cultures with a mixture of romanticism and moral deference. At the same time, the West’s managerial elite had become more concerned with administering decline than with preserving the cultural and political foundations that made Western success possible. Burnham was particularly scathing about the liberal tendency to dissolve hard distinctions - between truth and opinion, between civilisation and barbarism, and between friend and enemy. Without the willingness to make such distinctions and act upon them, he believed, no civilisation can long endure. What makes the book striking is its pessimism. Burnham did not believe the process was easily reversible. Once a civilisation loses the will to defend itself and begins to treat its own inheritance as a source of shame, recovery becomes extremely difficult. Suicide of the West reads like a warning that was largely ignored.
Creative Deduction tweet media
English
19
125
318
18.4K
reason/sanity retweetet
C14 News | EN
C14 News | EN@c14english·
✝️🇮🇱🇱🇧 Christian Leaders in Southern Lebanon: “Annex Us to Israel” Leaders of the Christian community in southern Lebanon have made an extraordinary appeal for their communities to be annexed to Israel and granted full Israeli citizenship, arguing that “the real occupation is Hezbollah.”
English
160
1.5K
4.9K
161.1K
reason/sanity retweetet
IMPERATOR
IMPERATOR@IMPERATORAUS·
Does a civilisation have a right to exist? The answer is no. A civilisation exists only so long as it has the power, the virtue, and the will to exist. This is the hard realism of history, the principle Thucydides captured in his History of the Peloponnesian Wars when he wrote that "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must". Every civilisation – Eastern or Western – was forged by war, tempered by religion, and stabilised by law. Yet none of the people who lived in those empires imagined that their world could vanish within a single lifetime, since decline always arrives more swiftly than those living through it can comprehend. The paradox is that we study the past yet remain blind to the present. Every civilisation believes it is the exception – until it isn't. Civilisations do not die because they are conquered, they die because they surrender. Strength fades first in memory, then in custom, and finally in the character of a people. When a people abandon the moral and religious foundations that formed them, when institutions decay, when borders dissolve, when wealth replaces virtue, and when comfort dulls duty, decline follows with astonishing speed – not as a sudden catastrophe, but as the final stage of a long defeat. The West's achievements are extraordinary, but past greatness guarantees nothing. Our ancestors built something remarkable, but they cannot save us. We must save ourselves. Cities can be remade, but once your civilisation is gone, it's gone forever.
IMPERATOR tweet media
English
53
532
1.3K
28.6K
reason/sanity retweetet
David J Harris Jr
David J Harris Jr@DavidJHarrisJr·
🚨INSANE: This guy defended his girlfriend from a Somali who was trying to sexually assault her. The Somali stabbed him, and he tried to defend himself, ending up in the hospital. Scottish justice pursued him with assault charges and convicted him, ruining his criminal record, while the Somali was free and didn’t even show up.
David J Harris Jr tweet media
English
1.7K
13.8K
36.1K
560.6K
reason/sanity retweetet
Nikolas
Nikolas@NikKo_ial·
Αγανακτισμένη γυναίκα στη Γερμανία: "Ηλίθιοι φανατικοί...φύγετε! Πηγαίνετε πίσω στις πατρίδες σας και πάρτε μαζί σας και το ηλίθιο κοράνι σας" 👏👍 via @WHLeavitt
Ελληνικά
119
938
6.8K
100.7K
ASPCA
ASPCA@ASPCA·
🧡Thank you, Taylor and Travis🧡We’re deeply grateful to @taylorswift13 and @tkelce for their generous donation to the ASPCA as a part of their latest charitable giving announcement. Learn how you can make a difference at aspca.org/meow2026
ASPCA tweet mediaASPCA tweet mediaASPCA tweet mediaASPCA tweet media
English
64
2.2K
13K
281.5K
reason/sanity retweetet
John Stossel
John Stossel@JohnStossel·
I thought the ASPCA ran most animal shelters. I was wrong. They collect more than $300 million (Those sad commercials with dogs in cages are a gold mine) in donations, but spend only 2% of that on shelters. Where does the money go?:
English
1.1K
8.3K
22.4K
390.7K
reason/sanity retweetet
Terrence Popp
Terrence Popp@PoppTerrence·
Terrence Popp tweet media
ZXX
530
8.9K
103.4K
3.2M
reason/sanity retweetet
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
Germany's Chancellor Merz: We can no longer accept the extraordinarily high levels of sick leave in our companies. We are abolishing sick leave by telephone and introducing the requirement to submit a medical certificate from the very first day of illness. We know this is a tough decision. But we can no longer afford this competitive disadvantage caused by prolonged absences from work.
English
4.6K
3.9K
26K
14.7M
reason/sanity retweetet
The Conservative Alternative
The Conservative Alternative@OldeWorldOrder·
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money." —Alexis de Tocqueville
The Conservative Alternative tweet media
English
82
1.6K
4.7K
48.1K
reason/sanity retweetet
Jake Rattlesnake
Jake Rattlesnake@jakerattlesnk·
So, Mehdi Hasan debated right wing German Maximilian Krah and tried to with a straight face, claim that “70 percent of German refugees work in high skilled professions” 😭 😂 Watch his argument get absolutely torn apart 👇
English
152
663
8.1K
415.5K
reason/sanity retweetet
Asian Dawn
Asian Dawn@AsianDawn4·
🇹🇭 Thailand can be wild. KFC once sued a Thai friend chicken restaurant called "Hitler" for trademark infringement. A Jewish tourist reported their biscuit sign: "We bake our biscuits right. Over 6 million served."
English
138
529
5.5K
142.4K
reason/sanity retweetet
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
The Law by Bastiat made simple: 1. Every person has a natural right to defend their life, liberty, and property. Law is simply that individual right organized collectively – nothing more, nothing less. 2. The moment law goes beyond that — taking from some to give to others — it has stopped being law and become legal plunder. 3. Legal plunder isn’t exceptional. It’s the normal operating mode of most governments most of the time: subsidies, redistribution, bailouts – each one a faction using state force to extract what it couldn’t get by voluntary agreement. It was all already there in 1850. 4. The test is simple: if the same act performed by a private individual would be called theft, it’s theft when the state does it too. The badge doesn’t change the nature of the act. 5. Two wrong responses to legal plunder: give everyone the right to plunder (socialism), or let the current plunderers keep going (cronyism). The only legitimate answer is to strip law back to its actual function. 6. Once people see law as a machine for taking rather than protecting, everyone floods politics to control it – because whoever runs the machine can point it at their enemies. This is why Bastiat defined the state as “that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.” Lobbying and corruption aren’t aberrations. They’re the logical conclusion of a law that plunders. 7. The title is the whole argument: Bastiat isn’t describing what the law is. He’s describing what it’s supposed to be – and showing, relentlessly, how far the thing calling itself law has drifted from that. Real law protects. Everything else wearing that name is organized force and theft in disguise.
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

Atlas Shrugged made simple: 1. Society runs on a small number of highly capable producers – industrialists, inventors, engineers – whose work everyone depends on but takes for granted. 2. The system starts rewarding need over achievement: the more capable you are, the more you’re expected to sacrifice for those who aren’t. 3. Success gets treated like a debt – taxed, regulated, resented – until the most capable start asking why they bother trying at all. 4. One by one, led by a man named John Galt, they simply withdraw – walking away rather than keep propping up a system that punishes them for producing. 5. Without them, the whole structure collapses, revealing that the “automatic” prosperity everyone assumed was actually being generated by specific, irreplaceable people. 6. Atlas is the Titan from Greek myth, condemned to carry the sky on his shoulders forever – Rand’s stand-in for the producer class, holding up civilization while getting blamed for it. 7. “Shrugged” is the whole argument in one word: Atlas doesn’t fight, doesn’t protest – he just quietly sets the weight down. Nobody realized the sky was being held up by anyone in particular, until the day it isn’t. You don’t want us? We just go…🤷🏻‍♂️

English
63
1.1K
3.2K
147K
reason/sanity retweetet
Students For Liberty
Students For Liberty@sfliberty·
American inventor Josiah Warren, one of the country's earliest libertarian thinkers, was there. He watched the community fail from the inside and later wrote about why. His conclusion: "The difference of opinion, tastes and purposes increased just in proportion to the demand for conformity." The more the community demanded unity, the more it fractured.
Students For Liberty tweet media
English
14
273
3.6K
180.2K
reason/sanity retweetet
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
Atlas Shrugged made simple: 1. Society runs on a small number of highly capable producers – industrialists, inventors, engineers – whose work everyone depends on but takes for granted. 2. The system starts rewarding need over achievement: the more capable you are, the more you’re expected to sacrifice for those who aren’t. 3. Success gets treated like a debt – taxed, regulated, resented – until the most capable start asking why they bother trying at all. 4. One by one, led by a man named John Galt, they simply withdraw – walking away rather than keep propping up a system that punishes them for producing. 5. Without them, the whole structure collapses, revealing that the “automatic” prosperity everyone assumed was actually being generated by specific, irreplaceable people. 6. Atlas is the Titan from Greek myth, condemned to carry the sky on his shoulders forever – Rand’s stand-in for the producer class, holding up civilization while getting blamed for it. 7. “Shrugged” is the whole argument in one word: Atlas doesn’t fight, doesn’t protest – he just quietly sets the weight down. Nobody realized the sky was being held up by anyone in particular, until the day it isn’t. You don’t want us? We just go…🤷🏻‍♂️
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

The Road to Serfdom made simple: 1. Plan the whole economy: someone must decide what gets made and who gets what, since people don’t naturally agree on one set of priorities. 2. These decisions are too big and detailed for normal democratic debate, so power shifts to a smaller group who can just act – technocrats. 3. Fixed laws everyone can rely on get replaced by case-by-case rulings, because a plan needs flexibility, not predictability. 4. Dissent becomes a problem to manage, not an opinion to vote on – the plan can’t work if people are free to ignore it. 5. Enforcing all that selects for people most willing to be ruthless – Hayek’s “worst get on top” – i.e. negative moral selection. 6. Since economics touches everything (your job, home, speech), controlling the economy ends up controlling your whole life. That’s the "serfdom."

English
483
3.3K
16.3K
2.4M