𓆏 retweetet
𓆏
11.7K posts

𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet

Terence Tao put it plainly: there is no evidence that LLMs exhibit genuine creativity.
Yes, they have solved some Erdős problems. But these are low-hanging fruit, questions that attracted little attention and that yield once the right existing techniques are applied. That is not creativity. That is search plus recombination.
Yes, LLM outputs can look impressive. But look at who is impressed: typically non-experts. Experts know very well that LLM performance gets terrible when you approach the frontier of human knowledge.
And this is not a temporary gap. It reflects a structural limitation.
We do not fully understand human creativity. But we do know a key property:
Conceptual leaps: the ability to generate new representations, not just recombine existing ones.
LLMs do not do this. They interpolate in representation space. They operate within existing conceptual frameworks; they do not create new ones.
This is why we haven’t “yet seen them take the next step”.

English
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet

Mohamed Salah announces he will leave Liverpool at the end of the season. More to follow @TimesSport
instagram.com/reel/DWRvm_Wjn…
English
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet

The rapid advances we see in AI-derived mathematical proofs are almost certainly not representative of science in general.
A core driver of these advances is that AI-derived proofs can be translated into a highly structured human-designed verification language, which can then be checked using traditional computer programs.
The AI slop-cannon can generate as many slop attempts as needed to get a proof that works, because humans already built the de-slopification engine that automates digging the diamonds out of the slop.
This kind of cheap validation does not exist in data science or the empirical sciences more broadly.
In fact, validation in the sciences is often orders of magnitude more expensive than all the other parts, which is why AI is going to be much less effective there.
English
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet

Trump's installed leads at the SEC are actively blocking the enforcement division from investigating insider trading tied to the Trump family.
tradfi news@tradfi
*SEC ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR MARGARET RYAN CLASHED WITH AGENCY BOSSES BEFORE RESIGNING LAST WEEK *RYAN WANTED TO BE MORE AGGRESSIVE IN PURSUING MISCONDUCT, INCLUDING CASES WITH TIES TO TRUMP & HIS FAMILY
English
𓆏 retweetet

the is probably the 10th time that he's done this...the amount of money that Trump and inner-circle have made in the past 14 months by using Inside information is absurd. when everything's said and done, that'll be one of his biggest 'legacy' as a president..
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)@adamscochran
5 minutes before Trump’s announcement: * $1.5B notional worth of S&P500 (ES) futures are bought in a single clip. * $192M notional of oil futures (CL) sold. More than 4x-6x any other trade size during the market close. Insiders profited from his lies in broad daylight!
English
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet
𓆏 retweetet



















