Sheila Lee
192 posts
Do you believe that Jesus died for your sins and rose after three days ?
A) Absolutely yes
B) No
English
Just fan account 😘
Be Honest…🎂
Elon’s birthday is tomorrow 🎂🚀
Will you wish him?
Happy birthday?
Yes 🎂
No 💔
English
@WHLeavitt This is sick. So sad for the children who have no alternative but to endure this abuse.
English
In Pakistan, 32-year-old Mohamed married 10-year-old Fatima — now pregnant — after paying her father just $580. This barbaric child marriage is legal under Sharia law.
Islam is savage and incompatible with civilization.
Ban Islamists and deport them all?
A. Yes
B. No
English
The Digital Mirage: Why Our Most Powerful Tool is Also Our Most Fragile
The internet is nothing short of a miracle. We’ve automated our daily grind, gamified our entertainment, and put global financial systems into the palms of our hands. It’s efficient, elegant, and brilliant—as long as the lights stay on.
The uncomfortable truth we rarely like to voice is that we are building the penthouse of human civilization on an incredibly fragile foundation. Relying entirely on a digital ecosystem that can be instantly severed by a failure in the power grid isn't just risky; it’s negligent.
The Reality of the Grid
We treat internet connectivity like oxygen, assuming it will always be there. But a society built strictly around digital architecture is highly vulnerable to a long list of disruptive wildcards:
Extreme Weather: Violent storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, and historic floods.
Geopolitics & Conflict: War, cyber-warfare, and physical terrorism targeting infrastructure.
Space Weather: Solar flares and EMP risks that ignore political borders entirely.
When the grid goes dark, your cloud-saved tutorials, bookmarked recipes, and digital medical manuals cease to exist.
The Ultimate Backup System: Paper and Ink
True collective intelligence isn't about sprinting blindly into a paperless future; it's about keeping one foot firmly anchored in the physical world. Maintaining a tangible, analog library is the ultimate insurance policy for human knowledge. We need to preserve hard copies of:
The Fundamentals: Mathematics, chemistry, physics, and medicine.
The Practical: How-to guides, agricultural manuals, and cookbooks.
The Human Soul: History, literature, philosophy, and novels.
A physical book doesn't require a software update, a lithium-ion battery, or a stable Wi-Fi connection to teach you how to purify water, construct a shelter, or treat an infection.
Knowledge is Not Hereditary
Here is the most critical piece of the puzzle: Knowledge does not pass down through DNA.
Evolution grants us survival instincts, but it doesn't grant us calculus, crop rotation, or the formula for penicillin. If our digital archives vanish and we have neglected our physical backups, we don't just pause progress—we hit the reset button. We return to square one.
The survival of human advancement relies entirely on the careful, deliberate study of truths already discovered, verified, and recorded by those who came before us. By all means, let's enjoy the convenience of the digital age. But let's also ensure our basements and local libraries are stocked with the brilliant, un-pluggable magic of printed books.
Protect the pages. One day, they might just protect us.
English
It's ironic how the Democrat Party uses Muslims to win votes and Muslims use the Democrat Party in attempts to gain entrance and acceptance into the U.S. However, there are major cultural clashes between the two ideologies which suggest they cannot peacefully coexist together due to the very real, deep-seated friction points between traditional Islamic beliefs and the platform of the modern Democratic Party. While Muslim Americans historically aligned with Democrats over shared concerns like civil rights, religious freedom, and immigration, that political alliance, in reality, is superficial.
This superficial alliance between Muslim Americans and the Democratic Party has long been of convenience as a means to advance two opposing causes—but the ideological clashes are impossible to ignore and yet to be realized by those Democrats whose heads are buried in the sand.
While shared ground exists on civil rights and immigration, a fundamental clash remains between modern secular progressivism and traditional Muslim theology.
Social & Gender Ideology: The Democratic platform’s focus on LGBTQ+ rights and gender identity directly conflicts with orthodox Islamic (Sharia), which holds very different views on marriage and sexuality and treats those opponents with harsh punishment.
Source of Moral Authority: Progressivism treats morality as an evolving social consensus centered on individual autonomy. Traditional Islam views their moral truth as absolute, eternal, and derived from divine revelation outlined in the Quran.
Foreign Policy: Decades of mainstream Democratic establishment support for Israel have deeply alienated a community that views Palestinian solidarity as a core religious and humanitarian obligation although many conflict with Democratic principles.
As the Democrat Party moves further into secular individualism, the underlying theological differences are quite polarized which illuminates the irony of the alliance of the two separate ideologies.
English
@atensnut @DangerousThinkg The irony of it is that Democrats symbolize everything Muslims hate and do not tolerate.
English
Yes, we do have religious freedom in the U.S., but we have laws those practices must not violate...protections and well being of certain individuals.
The sacred balance of religious freedom, constitutional authority, and civil rights is a harmony for American life. When looking at how Islam, Sharia Law, child protections, and women's rights interact in the U.S. legal system and how it draws the line between personal belief and the law of the land might be a conflict for some.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution explicitly states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Whether someone is Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or of any other faith, they enjoy the exact same constitutional right to worship freely.
Sharia Law refers to the religious, moral, and legal precepts of the Islamic faith. In the American legal system, religious guidelines—whether they come from Sharia, Jewish Halakha, or Catholic Canon Law—can never override or replace secular American law as is set by the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) of the Constitution, which establishes that the Constitution and federal statutes are the supreme law of the land.
While the Constitution protects the right to hold any religious belief, the manifestation of those beliefs must comply with the law. Ultimately, actions or practices rooted in religious beliefs that conflict with U.S. civil or criminal laws are illegal, and those involved in such acts are subject to prosecution. No individual or religion can enforce rules that violate American statutory law.
Because the U.S. Constitution and statutory laws hold ultimate authority, certain civil protections remain in effect regardless of religious beliefs. Religious freedom does not give anyone a legal pass to violate laws designed to protect vulnerable individuals.
U.S. federal and state laws maintain strict frameworks to protect minors from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Laws governing mandatory education, child abuse, and child marriage apply universally. If any religious or cultural practice attempts to permit actions that American law defines as harmful to a minor, civil and criminal courts will intervene immediately. Anyone engaging in these practices faces criminal liability and prosecution, regardless of their religious motivations.
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees "equal protection of the laws" to all persons, backed by extensive civil rights legislation ensuring equality in employment, education, and property ownership. No individual or institution can use religious doctrines to justify discrimination, domestic violence, or the stripping away of a woman’s constitutional rights without facing full legal consequences.
No, a Muslim 60 year old man is not allowed to have a 7 year old bride in the U.S., so living in the U.S. might land him in a U.S. prison.
Before anyone jumps head on into relocating to any country, perhaps they should examine that country's culture and laws to determine whether or not they will be able to legally practice their personal beliefs.
English
Some Issues Aren't Worth Discussing.
To debate a topic is to concede that it has at least two sides worth considering. When we debate the baseline humanity of certain groups, or the validity of sheer cruelty, we elevate atrocities to the level of "mere opinion."
If you continuously discuss the unthinkable, it gradually becomes acceptable to talk about, then acceptable to consider, and finally, acceptable to implement. Refusing to discuss "foul" issues keeps them firmly outside the boundaries.
We live in an era that obsesses over the idea that every single perspective deserves a platform, a debate, and a seat at the table. We’re told that open-mindedness means entertaining every thought.
But let’s be honest: Some ideas are not intellectual exercises. They are just foul.
There is a profound difference between being open-minded and being morally vacant. When an issue fundamentally denies the basic humanity of others, celebrates cruelty, or revels in the base degradation of human dignity, it does not deserve a counterargument. It deserves a boundary.
Here is why civilized society must refuse to debate the unthinkable:
Debate implies legitimacy. The moment you agree to debate a depraved premise, you concede that it is an opinion worth weighing. It isn't.
It shifts the baseline. Entertaining baseline cruelty under the guise of "free thought" slowly normalizes the monstrous. It turns horrors into talking points.
Civility isn't neutrality. Being a civilized person doesn't mean having no stomach for boundaries; it means knowing exactly where the line is and refusing to cross it for the sake of entertainment or intellectual vanity.
True intellectual maturity isn't the willingness to listen to absolutely anything—it’s the wisdom to know which ideas are so base that they belong in the dark, entirely outside the conversation of civilized people.
Stop giving a microphone to things that only deserve a closed door.
English
@WorkElizab My thoughts are wondering why it would be posted. This man was murdered by his own son, wasn't he? I'm not sure his comments would be noteworthy, sadly.
English
@DavidJHarrisJr I can't wrap my head around why anyone would have voted for Kamala. :) Please don't categorize white women. We're all different.
English
🚨Elizabeth Banks says she can't wrap her head around White women who voted for Trump over Kamala Harris!
Thoughts?
English
Be honest 👇
If this kid handed you this sign, what would your answer be? 😄
A. Yes 👍
B. No 👎
C. It's complicated 🤔
D. Depends on the tweet 📱
English
@russ19114 @WHLeavitt If she continues the bad behavior after being taught better, then fire her. I have learned throughout the years that sometimes people don't know better. My stepfather used to say, "when people learn better, they do better."
English
@Sheilahlee @WHLeavitt What are you kidding us? Fire her immediately
English
An Amazon delivery driver casually drives across someone’s lawn with zero respect for private property.
This is getting ridiculous.
Do you support firing her?
A. Yes
B. No
English
This is abuse in the worst way, children being used for sex. Men who do this can only feel powerful when overtaking a child and are total wimps. They should be castrated, then executed.
Matthew 18:6
"but whoso shall cause one of these little ones that believe on me to stumble, it is profitable for him that a great millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be sunk in the depth of the sea."
English
Shocking: a Muslim child just gave birth to a baby.
Muslim men—fathers, brothers, uncles—should be deeply ashamed.
Islam is a cult.
Time to deport Islamists and ban Islamic immigration?
A. Yes
B. No
English
From an AI discussion:
"The Space Colonization Delusion: A Rich Man’s Playground Built on the Poor Man’s Dime
We constantly hear of sci-fi visions of humanity’s "next chapter" on Mars. Tech billionaires and politicians look at the stars and talk of escaping Earth's boundaries. But if you strip away the CGI and the marketing hype, you're left with an uncomfortable truth: space exploration has morphed into an elitist playground, fueled by the heavy tax burdens of ordinary citizens who will never leave the ground.
The Ultimate Rich Man’s Playground
While regular working people watch their paychecks shrink against the rising costs of housing, healthcare, and basic necessities, billions in public tax dollars are funneled into aerospace contracts and billionaire-led space ventures.
We are told this is for "the future of humanity." But whose future? If Earth ever faces a catastrophic crisis, the ultra-wealthy won't be bringing the working class with them even IF they could survive and travel to another planet. The average citizen is subsidizing the research, development, and ultimate escape hatches for the global elite, all while schools, roads, and hospitals remain underfunded.
Space exploration yields great satellite data and incredible photos, but the obsession with human colonization is a fantasy built on a foundation of radioactive dust. If we possess the technology, intelligence, and collective will to theoretically terraform a freezing, irradiated desert millions of miles away, we absolutely have the tools to fix the planet we already inhabit.
If man were to step onto the surface of Mars without a spacesuit, it would be a matter of seconds before the environment became lethal. Even with a state-of-the-art spacesuit, living on Mars long-term would trigger slow, grueling, physical changes to the human body.
Here is exactly how Mars would finish man off, from the instantaneous to the slow burn:
1. The Instant Killer: Atmospheric Pressure (Time to death: ~1–2 minutes)
Earth’s atmosphere presses down on us with comfortable force. Mars, however, has an atmosphere less than 1% as thick as Earth's.
Stepping onto Mars unprotected puts man well past the Armstrong Limit—the altitude where atmospheric pressure is so low that the boiling point of water drops below the normal temperature of the human body (37°C or 98.6°F).
What happens: The moisture on the tongue, in the eyes, and inside the lungs would literally begin to boil.
The myth: The body wouldn't explode (skin is remarkably tough and elastic), but blood and bodily fluids would form gas bubbles, causing massive tissue swelling, blocking blood flow, and throwing man into profound circulatory shock within seconds.
2. The Suffocation: Carbon Dioxide (Time to death: ~2–3 minutes)
Even if man managed to survive the low pressure, man wouldn't be able to breathe.
Mars' atmosphere is 95% carbon dioxide (CO₂), 2.6% nitrogen, and 1.9% argon. Oxygen makes up 0.16%.
Because there is virtually no oxygen, and because the pressure is so low, man wouldn't just suffocate from a lack of air—the pressure differential would actively suck the remaining oxygen right out of the bloodstream through the lungs. Man would lose consciousness from hypoxia in about 15 seconds.
3. The Deep Freeze: Extreme Cold (Time to death: Minutes to hours)
Mars is a frozen wasteland.
Summary of Death Timeline:
0–15 Seconds
Oxygen is sucked from the lungs; man blacks out.
15–60 Seconds
Bodily fluids (saliva, tears) boil; severe tissue swelling begins.
2 Minutes
Brain death occurs from total lack of oxygen.
1 Hour+
The body is completely frozen solid and irradiated.
The perspective that space colonization is an unrealistic, financially wasteful endeavor is well-argued by many scientists, economists, and policymakers. This viewpoint is built on a foundation of harsh environmental realities, economic realities, and global realities."
Living on another planet is not a reality.
English
🚀 Elon Musk believes only a few people can solve this instantly. Are you one of them? 🤔😏
English
One takeaway from a sermon I heard yesterday:
"Not only should we strive to leave a better world for our children, but we should strive to leave better children for the world."
English