Stacker
906 posts

Stacker
@Stacker187
Fullstack-Dev @nestframework @nuxt_js | Not looking for work
Beigetreten Mart 2018
123 Folgt86 Follower

@Stacker187 @mauriziolorio @Stake @StakeEddy Then why did they let him play 👍
To lose money okay but to withdraw no
Retard
English

I won 3.9 BTC (~€325k at the time) on Stake.
They blocked my account and refused to pay.
Almost a year asking for proof — none provided.
Now this goes public.
I’ll send $500 to 5 people who comment with their Stake ID and tag @Stake & @StakeEddy
#Stake #Casino #Gambling




English

Both Railgun and NEAR do the work to not service thieves like this bc they’ve actually built something that provides value to real people.
You don’t and you don’t.
You didn’t build a protocol. You didn’t build anything that’s decentralized.
You have the private keys and send and bridge the funds your fucking self. In this case, on and behalf of thieves.
You service literal fucking thieves who harm people of this industry.
Worst of all, apparently you do this for fucking free?
Goddamn stupid little cuck, stfu gtfo.
English

Hey guys, I was sleeping. Really sorry about that. If I’d been awake, I would of course have stopped these funds from going through.
1. Wagyu will never freeze funds. That’s just against everything I stand for.
My goal is instead to stop these kinds of funds from ever entering, similar to NEAR Intents or Railgun.
Compliance tools are in place to block transactions like these.
These just happened to pass because there was no risk score on them for a while from multiple venues.
The risk scores eventually kicked in, which is why the transactions stopped and only a small amount went through.
Clearly the current protocols aren’t sufficient. I’ll be working to make sure this never happens again.
English

@DrWgamba Smart to make a tweet about something you have no idea of. The EOS public seeding is indeed fully provably fair. Empire checks for the current block number on join, adds a buffer and then waits for the target block to be mined. It’s comitting to something that can’t be influenced
English

@FrazierKay No strings attached but your account will be locked 95% of the time
English

@spankyskins @Dogeater1612 @Vancho666_CS Yeah, he also believes in no rug pull, so probably didn't understand your question
English

@Stacker187 @Dogeater1612 @Vancho666_CS I think he misread what i said
I will pay $5000 if they DO scam, if they dont he owes me $5000
English

Anyone have the balls to bet on whether they scam or not? I'm willing to put up $1000 if the site rug pulls. If not, you owe me $1000.
All fearmongers because 1 site took away your “jobs”.
Vqlt@VqltUK
Skins(.)com, the freshest marketplace on the scene is owned by a scammer. Recently a new marketplace has taken over the scene, paying notable people in the scene for promo via giveaways, using their twitter badge etc. Skinsdotcom directly contribute to gambling sites, use sites like skinsdeck(same owner) to populate their site with skins and using it brings risk to your account. Contributing to the stocking of gambling sites, directly or down the chain can result in a trade ban.
English

@Dogeater1612 @spankyskins @Vancho666_CS You are contradicting your initial tweet. I am not sure if you fully understand what he asked
English

@spankyskins Yes time limit is 1 month. @Vancho666_CS will middleman. Confirm if you want
English

@whoiscriminal Yes if I own two companies I totally do not want both to be profitable
English

















