Status Pay 🎄🎄🎄🎄

#MMTLP Have you heard of AST having 2 different cusip’s for nextbridge? They opened a second account for me and said it was because when E*trade sent over second batch they had my middle initial included. I was just looking at the statements and they have different cusip. December statement 591994371 and February statement 629999590. Both came from E*Trade. Wondering if anyone else has had this situation?

@Status_Pay Recently divorced? What a total surprise.

Jeff Davies’ deleted post party! In honor of the recent action taken by Nextbridge, I encourage everyone to post their favorite screenshots to use X as intended to aggregate data. He always loved to speak freely on X. Gone but not forgotten Señor Davies. $MMTLP $MMAT

Why is it that people who have already buried themselves six feet under, continue to dig deeper??? MMTLP MMAT TRCH #FAFO

@johnnaarintl @teekay5150

@Status_Pay @teekay5150 healthy, workout, his profile picture must be 20 years old too....a girls worst nightmare 😱 a fraud all the way around! 🤢🤮

For posterity, $WLUNA internal Coinbase market price valuation $85.35 USD/WLUNA. The damages for opportunity lost is staggering. This is while assets frozen on exchange under suspension due to volatility. They had to suspend because they couldn’t let us capitalize on the market conditions. $COIN must be held accountable for their failure in fiduciary responsibility.

Coinbase Specialist Team on wLuna “Any historical valuations you see (or previously saw) for this position reflect how our systems attempted to price the asset at different points in time, rather than amounts you could actually realize through trading on Coinbase.”

🚨NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS FILES TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIM IN HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AGAINST JEFF DAVIES @EnergyCredit1. LINK TO PETITION AND EXHIBITS BELOW. TRCH MMTLP MMAT @nbhydrocarbons drive.google.com/file/d/1oNEpaP…

Would ya look at that…. 🚨Nextbridge Hydrocarbons files Civil Tortious Interference case against Jeffrey Davies.🚨 What’s the saying? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes? Looks like it’s GAME ON, Mr. Davies. 🔥🔥🔥 #FAFO $MMTLP $MMAT #MMTLParmy #Relentless #gsc.tab=0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/s…

FINRA is claiming that providing data to the MMAT Bankruptcy Trustee is too burdensome but... 1. Since FINRA already investigated, the majority of the requested data should already be available. 2. The podcast linked in the quote post below features FINRA's Sam Draddy. He's the guy that told the SEC on 12-5-22 that FINRA was actively Blue Sheeting (investigating) MMAT & MMTLP. In the podcast he talks about how AI dramatically decreases the time it takes to conduct investigations. FINRA is lying, they didn't protect investors, the data will prove this. MMAT traded for a good amount of time AFTER MMTLP was U3 halted. If FINRA discovered manipulation in MMAT during their Blue Sheet investigation, why wasn't the SEC altered to do something about it? @SECPaulSAtkins @SECGov @TheJusticeDept

META MATERIALS BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING Case No.: 24-50792-gs U.S. Bankruptcy Court – District of Nevada Hearing: FINRA Motion to Quash (Status & Scheduling Conference) Date: March 17, 2026 Time: 1:30 PM (PDT) Quick summary: 🧾 Big Picture (⚠️ Not legal advice) This hearing is about whether FINRA has to hand over a large amount of documents/data to the Meta Materials bankruptcy trustee (Lovato). •Other firms (Citadel, Virtu, Anson, Nasdaq) are already involved •The judge is trying to coordinate all of these fights together •The key issue: 👉 How much information FINRA has to give, and how hard it is for them to do it ⸻ ⚖️ FINRA’s Position (Norris) 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 FINRA is basically saying: •“What the trustee is asking from us is WAY bigger than what they asked from others” 😭 •Other firms were only asked for: •Limited trading data •Short time period (160 days) •But FINRA is being asked for: •Emails •Texts •Internal communications •Multiple categories of data (9+ categories) 👉 Their argument: •This is too burdensome (too much work)😭 •Some of it is legally protected (privileged) •They want: •More briefing (extra legal arguments) (stall) •A chance to argue this separately (stall) ⸻ 🧑‍⚖️ Trustee’s Position (Burnett / Brust) The trustee is pushing back hard: (Note - this was compelling and I think the Judge was agreeing) •“We already argued all of this months ago” ‼️‼️ •“There are thousands of pages of filings already” •“The judge has MORE than enough information” 👉 Their key points: •FINRA already: •Investigated market manipulation •So their files are highly relevant •The trustee has been trying to get this info for over a year ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ •Delays are: •Costing money ‼️ •Risking statute of limitations deadlines‼️ 👉 Bottom line: •“Stop delaying—just rule already” ⸻ 🔥 Key Dispute (This is the REAL fight) It comes down to: 1. Burden •FINRA: “This is huge and unfair”😭😭😭😭😭 •Trustee: “You’re different because you investigated this” 2. Scope •FINRA = broad request (communications, internal files) •Others = narrow (just trading data) 3. Privilege •FINRA claims: •Investigative files are protected •Some data (like CAT data) legally cannot be shared ⸻ 🧑‍⚖️ Judge’s Take The judge is trying to balance both sides: •Acknowledges FINRA is a bit behind compared to others •Decides to allow: 👉 Short additional briefing (to be fair to FINRA) But also: •Clearly agrees with trustee that: 👉 “This needs to move forward and get decided” FINRA asked for 2 weeks. The judge said no- 10 days. ⸻ 📅 What Happens Next (IMPORTANT TIMELINE) •FINRA submits extra argument (brief): March 27 •Trustee responds: April 3 •Hearing (big one): 👉 April 20 at 1:30 PM Pacific (4:30 PM Eastern) 💥💥💥 ⸻ 🎯 Why This Matters This is actually a critical inflection point: •If FINRA loses: 👉 They may have to turn over: •Internal investigations •Communications •Potential evidence of market manipulation •If FINRA wins or limits scope: 👉 A lot of key evidence could stay hidden ⸻ 🧠 Simple Analogy Think of it like this: •Trustee: “Give me everything—you already investigated the crime” •FINRA: “That’s like asking for our entire case file—it’s too much and protected”😭 •Judge: “Okay, I’ll give you a short chance to argue that—but we’re deciding soon” ⏰

@MrsApeVentures @winmonies metamaterial.com/blog-sub/the-r… The blue butterfly has been a symbol for $MMAT for a long time as well. WAGMI

The Butterfly Deflect

@Duglett Correct

@Status_Pay The trustee requested a week for both and got 10 days and a week, correct?. Much better than 2 weeks for finra’s supplemental filing and 2 weeks for the trustee’s response~

Update for MMAT bankruptcy timeline. FINRA supplemental filing due 3/27 Trustee response by 4/3 Next hearing on docket 4/20 Judge stated be prepared for arguments shortly following hearing as he wants to move this along. $MMAT $MMTLP

@RubenCa27595660 FINRA attorney was recently added to this case and asked for time to respond to previous hearing. Judge was gratuitous and gave him 10 days.

why are there more hearings and additional supplemental filings, I thought this was done already? should the judge not have all info by now? $MMTLP $MMAT

Happy St. Patrick's Day 🍀 MMTLPeople and @potus It's time ... MMTLP MMAT

@ENERGY $MMTLP was trying and was attacked for having potential. Where is the assistance from the government to protect the interests of Americans?

Real liquid gold doesn’t come in a pot, it comes in a barrel. DRILL, BABY, DRILL.

12/d They regulated MMTLP like a plane ✈️ ran it like a train 🚂and only realized the difference when it crashed. If no one saw the FULL system… was it a failure…? or a blind spot by DESIGN⁉️⁉️✈️ This isn’t about one ticker. It’s about whether modern market structure allows risk to exist between systems, that regulators don’t fully see. Because that’s exactly what global stability bodies are warning about. I highly recommend reading the FSB report. Today the SEC clarified the rule, but not the reality. #MMTLP #MarketIntegrity

12/c Hey @FINRA, the @SECGov clarified today that Rule 15c2-11 applies to equity securities only. But if a security like #MMTLP was governed by equity rules… and handled outside equity systems as a hybrid… 👉 were those protections ever fully applied? Why don’t you call the Compliance Officer at Fidelity and find out?

12/b Dear @FinStbBoard your reports warn that fragmented data and synthetic exposure create blind spots regulators can’t see. In a real world case like #MMTLP, where operational handling diverged from legal classification, would that qualify as a systemic visibility gap? #MarketIntegrity

12/a Thoughts and Questions Beyond the #MMTLP fiasco there is a much bigger question: If regulators claim a security is governed by equity rules, but broker-dealers actually process it through non-equity infrastructure, then WHO EXACTLY is responsible when those rules are never meaningfully applied, and is that a failure of compliance, or a system designed with blind spots no one is ACCOUNTABLE for? Let me rephrase it: If risk is defined LEGALLY but managed OPERATIONALLY, and those two don’t match, is the system broken, or is it functioning exactly as designed to avoid seeing the FULL risk??? If you made it this far, which image best describes the situation?